- Joined
- May 24, 2013
- Messages
- 23,359
- Reaction score
- 33,750
Why are you trying to get this vote off the ground? Do you even think she is wolfy?That was mostly due to being nightkilled by wolves though, yes?
Why are you trying to get this vote off the ground? Do you even think she is wolfy?That was mostly due to being nightkilled by wolves though, yes?
There is a difference. One implies she's inherently sketchy/misread often. The other implies she apparently becomes a top village read very quickly due to being read correctly.Functionally she's dying in the first cycle, so I don't really see the difference
I think she has some wolf equity, yes.Why are you trying to get this vote off the ground? Do you even think she is wolfy?
Oh, I also got yeeted D2 in a speed game a short while ago, also as a villagerThat was mostly due to being nightkilled by wolves though, yes?
I think both are true. Just because she becomes a village read very quickly because of her own reads doesn't mean she starts there right out the gate.There is a difference. One implies she's inherently sketchy/misread often. The other implies she apparently becomes a top village read very quickly due to being read correctly.
I get killed by wolves early because I often push at least one wolf D1 and end the day with my vote on one, not because I'm a top village read (have confirmed this with the packs after the fact). I've been questionable basically every time I'm villager.There is a difference. One implies she's inherently sketchy/misread often. The other implies she apparently becomes a top village read very quickly due to being read correctly.
Okay, do you have any reads right now?I get killed by wolves early because I often push at least one wolf D1 and end the day with my vote on one, not because I'm a top village read (have confirmed this with the packs after the fact). I've been questionable basically every time I'm villager.
Yes, because that's the point of a pressure vote, but it's not like a pressure vote cannot be changed. You're making a big deal out of something that really isn't. I don't think you're wolfy for it, but this is the second game in a row (for me, because I didn't play FTF's game) where people have acted like pressure votes aren't a thing and tried to yeet me for it, and it's annoying. Just because it's something you don't care to do yourself doesn't mean it's not a way of playing that exists and that I've done plenty of times before. And honestly, I don't think I've ever placed a pressure vote and then stayed on it to yeet close - because generally the person I've placed it on shows up and posts enough content that I see reason to move elsewhere.I mean they are more static than salt votes IMO.
Ok, well, again, I have literally never missed a yeet close, so I don't think you have to worry about that.my concern is that all the people on now arent going to be on when the other half of the roster decides to show up. Maybe I'm just paranoid because I havent played a 12/12 since my first game, but a concern of mine is that pressure votes from now dont get removed after people show up, because the people who placed them arent on thread, and wolves capitalize on it and build a wagon on some random person. like sure pressure vote someone D2, D3, but its D1 and we started on a week day. I trust that everyone will show up when they can.
She did have 1 good point though. That a pressure vote could be a mirage to say “look I’m doing something for the village” when it’s not really useful to vote someone who is sleeping. And when she comes on to post it will be because she woke up, not because you pressure voted her.Yes, because that's the point of a pressure vote, but it's not like a pressure vote cannot be changed. You're making a big deal out of something that really isn't. I don't think you're wolfy for it, but this is the second game in a row (for me, because I didn't play FTF's game) where people have acted like pressure votes aren't a thing and tried to yeet me for it, and it's annoying. Just because it's something you don't care to do yourself doesn't mean it's not a way of playing that exists and that I've done plenty of times before. And honestly, I don't think I've ever placed a pressure vote and then stayed on it to yeet close - because generally the person I've placed it on shows up and posts enough content that I see reason to move elsewhere.
Ok, well, again, I have literally never missed a yeet close, so I don't think you have to worry about that.
If I had made up some reason to be voting samac instead of point blank saying that I'd RNGed the people who hadn't posted yet, would we even be having this conversation?
I think mkg's sass and boldness is pushing her toward a village lean given her meta. I find it interesting that Pippy chose to push your buttons again, can't tell if that's just Pippy having fun or if there's some kind of incentive behind it, keeping an eye on her. You've not pinged me yet at all. I found Dubz's naked vote interesting but I think she wouldn't make that kind of a move as a wolf.Okay, do you have any reads right now?
I’m not even the primary person discussing it with shorty, that’s mkg. I’ve only really engaged with it so far as how it does actually effect reads. Look at my last post regarding the discussion.I think mkg's sass and boldness is pushing her toward a village lean given her meta. I find it interesting that Pippy chose to push your buttons again, can't tell if that's just Pippy having fun or if there's some kind of incentive behind it, keeping an eye on her. You've not pinged me yet at all. I found Dubz's naked vote interesting but I think she wouldn't make that kind of a move as a wolf.
Shorty and sun are in neutrals, the things they've said have all been NAI to their metas so far. The pressure vote discussion feels like a big distraction and I don't have a good feel of where to start reading the people who's posts have almost all been about the pressure discussion. It's just a lot of personal preference that people would probably be arguing regardless of their affiliation.
well if you BSed it, I'd hope someone would call you on it idk what real reason there would be to vote someone who isnt on yet. but like yeah, if you were voting for someone else for an actual reason sure I wouldnt have an issue with it. And I get it, its D1 and there isnt much to go on yet, but like I said, I just dont see how pressure voting someone who we know wont be on is contributing anything to the thread.Yes, because that's the point of a pressure vote, but it's not like a pressure vote cannot be changed. You're making a big deal out of something that really isn't. I don't think you're wolfy for it, but this is the second game in a row (for me, because I didn't play FTF's game) where people have acted like pressure votes aren't a thing and tried to yeet me for it, and it's annoying. Just because it's something you don't care to do yourself doesn't mean it's not a way of playing that exists and that I've done plenty of times before. And honestly, I don't think I've ever placed a pressure vote and then stayed on it to yeet close - because generally the person I've placed it on shows up and posts enough content that I see reason to move elsewhere.
Ok, well, again, I have literally never missed a yeet close, so I don't think you have to worry about that.
If I had made up some reason to be voting samac instead of point blank saying that I'd RNGed the people who hadn't posted yet, would we even be having this conversation?
Well since you apparently have no problem with salt votes, if I'd said something like "yeet samac for tie breaks in England," that wouldn't bother you? I don't agree that pressure voting someone is somehow contributing less to the thread than if I'd been like "yeet Zenge because his sock choice today bothers me."well if you BSed it, I'd hope someone would call you on it idk what real reason there would be to vote someone who isnt on yet. but like yeah, if you were voting for someone else for an actual reason sure I wouldnt have an issue with it. And I get it, its D1 and there isnt much to go on yet, but like I said, I just dont see how pressure voting someone who we know wont be on is contributing anything to the thread.
What socks are Zenge wearing?Well since you apparently have no problem with salt votes, if I'd said something like "yeet samac for tie breaks in England," that wouldn't bother you? I don't agree that pressure voting someone is somehow contributing less to the thread than if I'd been like "yeet Zenge because his sock choice today bothers me."
This is most likely v/v nonproductive arguing and I'm going to focus on reads instead.
Based on her retaliation vote, it seems like Genny disagrees with you about Dubz.I found Dubz's naked vote interesting but I think she wouldn't make that kind of a move as a wolf.
I know, I didn't say you were. The most I've seen from you has either been about the pressure discussion or about your Zenge yeet that I don't really understand, so I've got no feels to lean you either way.I’m not even the primary person discussing it with shorty, that’s mkg. I’ve only really engaged with it so far as how it does actually effect reads. Look at my last post regarding the discussion.
his sock choice today bothers me."
What socks are Zenge wearing?
but where are the ankles 🙁
Actually, Genny seemed as non serious about the dubz retaliation as dubz’s original vote. I took it all as friendly jest.Based on her retaliation vote, it seems like Genny disagrees with you about Dubz.
How are you reading Genny?
Is there a reason you’re explaining at length that your vote should be seen as partially serious without any explanation for why beyond “hasn’t seemed village yet”?Both maybe. He hasn’t seemed village yet. But the fact that I’m willing to vote with AM should tell you it’s not all salt, because those are the 2 people I’m saltiest towards. And I saw her on the vote and was still willing to vote there.
*edited to fix a spelling error autocorrect created
Are they soft?
I already moved my vote. It was a start based on the best information at the time.Is there a reason you’re explaining at length that your vote should be seen as partially serious without any explanation for why beyond “hasn’t seemed village yet”?
I don’t think pressure voting someone who is probably asleep, with no ping, when it’s only a few hours into the game already, is going to make them appear any fasterYeet samac
RNGed from who hasn't posted yet
Why are you all “Hmm” reacting my socks!?
This is a professional site. Ankles are too scandalous for SDN. That’s why we have “Ankles”.but where are the ankles 🙁
They’re very soft. Warm too. Why is soft in italics?Are they soft?
i have mixed feelings regarding your shoes. major dad vibes. do they provide good arch support?Why are you all “Hmm” reacting my socks!?
This is a professional site. Ankles are too scandalous for SDN. That’s why we have “Ankles”.
They’re very soft. Warm too. Why is soft in italics?
That could be true about Genny’s vote, idk. I have a hard time reading Genny.Actually, Genny seemed as non serious about the dubz retaliation as dubz’s original vote. I took it all as friendly jest.
interesting to me that you’re trying to use that to say there’s something to a vote on dubz.
Neutral. No D1 howling unfortunately but I don't have any good reason to put her in either direction yetBased on her retaliation vote, it seems like Genny disagrees with you about Dubz.
How are you reading Genny?
I think so? I never know. I think they’re too small though, because I got some running shoes a few months ago and they measured me and I got a bigger size than these. But I feel like companies never match up equally. Like a 12 Nike is not going to fit the same as a 12 New Balance. Sometimes my big toes feel squished so maybe they are a little small.i have mixed feelings regarding your shoes. major dad vibes. do they provide good arch support?
I didn't village read Dubz, I'm just not giving her any wolf points for the naked voteThat could be true about Genny’s vote, idk. I have a hard time reading Genny.
I’m not saying there’s something to a vote on Dubz. I’m saying April just village read Dubz, and Genny has her vote on Dubz. Genny and April had an interesting interaction earlier and so in light of that, and their potential disagreement about Dubz, I wanted to get April’s thoughts on Genny.
idk, but i think her posts are criminal.They’re very soft. Warm too. Why is soft in italics?
I think your socks look very nice but they would look even nicer on a day that's a lot less than 85 degrees out lolI think so? I never know. I think they’re too small though, because I got some running shoes a few months ago and they measured me and I got a bigger size than these. But I feel like companies never match up equally. Like a 12 Nike is not going to fit the same as a 12 New Balance. Sometimes my big toes feel squished so maybe they are a little small.
Edit: Also why did you sad react my socks? What’s wrong with my socks?!![]()
Got it.I didn't village read Dubz, I'm just not giving her any wolf points for the naked vote
I gave too much credit to this then.but I think she wouldn't make that kind of a move as a wolf.
why pippy?Good mornnnning
yeet pippy
Shorty pls.Yeet samac
RNGed from who hasn't posted yet

But that other 10% was through good old mechanic solving!This is how 90% of the wolf team in England got outted.
is zenge suddenly a collective? Zenge are wearing socks?What socks are Zenge wearing?
i don't think that's outside her usual meta as a mod. i wouldn't lean her wolfy for it.SHE TRIED TO PAY PEOPLE TO **** WITH ME AS A MOD
![]()
I tried writing it with "is" and then the plural "socks" was triggering me.is zenge suddenly a collective? Zenge are wearing socks?
Yes, I remember, Pippy.Does everyone know @samac 's never been misyeeted?
welcome to English?I tried writing it with "is" and then the plural "socks" was triggering me.
Allllmost offended by this comment.i don't think that's outside her usual meta as a mod. i wouldn't lean her wolfy for it.
is this like a challenge?Does everyone know @samac 's never been misyeeted?
what if i count each and every postMOD ANNOUNCEMENT:
In regards to the rule in the opening post stating that 5 content posts need to be made. We will not be actively be counting each and every post and keeping a tally but if we feel you are inactive, we will issue a warning. It is unfair to the other players and unfair to the mods who work hard on these games