2009-2010 University of Kansas Application Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Thanks RagingMoose, that information is really helpful--especially the bit about the HPV question. Was the question set up to be that specific? Because if it was, that is cause for worry. That means they could really ask anything that specific.:scared:

EDIT: Srsly, I am one cherry-poppin page-flipper, aren't I.

I couldn't tell if they would have pushed for an answer if I didn't know much about it or not, but yes the question was that specific.

What they actually asked was for me to discuss an issue that apparently took place in Texas where there was a push to make it required by law for women. They wanted to know if I agreed with that or if I thought an alternative would be better; I was also asked to talk about why I thought it was that women but not men who would potentially be required to be vaccinated and if I agreed with that. My answer was basically that an educational campaign, not a legal requirement, would probably be more productive, and pending FDA approval for use in men said campaign should encourage sexually active people of both genders the become vaccinated. I also said that I didn't think the idea of making it a law would sit well with a significant portion of people, especially given that HPV is a vaccine and many people, whether they concern is unfounded or not, see the vaccine as something that would increase promiscuity.

I tried to voice my opinion without running to big a risk of stepping on the interviewers toes; I think they were satisfied with the answer.
 
There are only a couple responses for this round in the feedback. Hopefully more people will post after RD interviews.
 
Hi, guys.
Moose - I'm glad I didn't have YOUR interviewer!!!! Jeez!!!

My interviews were a little different. I prepared for everything by reading EVERY post on the interview feedback forum. I also researched answers to ethical questions - what doctors actually do. I also keep up on the news every day anyway, so I knew what was going on with health care reform.

My first interview was with a PhD who teaches anatomy. His first question - before I even got sat down - was "Tell me why you want to be a doctor" I basically just elaborated on what I said in my personal statement.

Then we just had a casual conversation about stuff in my application - where I went to school, what I do for fun, where I lived before (Albuquerque), and things I did in my previous career as an engineer.

Then he asked me the ethical question. "Suppose you are a 3rd year student and you stay up all night with a patient. You see another 3rd year fudge Hematocrit values in the patient's chart. What do you do?" I said I would obviously give my colleague the benefit of the doubt - he has been up all night with me and mistakes can happen! The interviewer said "Ok, but you discover that he has flat-out lied to look good to the attending. What do you do?" My response was basically shock and I said that patient care comes FIRST - ahead of "looking good" and he seemed to like what I said.

Next, he asked me if I could invite any 3 people - living or dead - to dinner, who would it be? I said I'd invite Stephen Hawking - a renowned physicist and author of several books - his research has been fundamental to our understanding of the universe - but he is also a quadrapalegic (?sp?). Next, I would invite Pres. Obama because I respect his opinions and all that he has overcome to be the first African American president. Then, I said I would invite my husband. 🙂 That got us into a conversation about what my husband does and our lives together.

Then, he asked me - based on my work experience - what is one thing I liked and one thing I would change about how doctors interact with patients. I used specific examples of particular patients and doctors (of course I stayed within HIPAA rules and left out names and certain details). That got us into a discussion of health care reform.

By that time, the interview was over.

My next interview was with another PhD. It was supposed to be with 2 people, but 1 of them couldn't make it.

She asked me "Tell me something that I don't know from your application." I talked about how I left the KC area to go live in New Mexico and how much I missed HOME. I talked about how much I LOVE living here again and how my husband and I don't want to leave. I talked about how much I LOVE living on my mini-farm in Leavenworth County. (WARNING: THIS WAS ALL 100% TRUE). That got us into a discussion of Leavenworth County - she lives there too.

She asked me when I am a doctor, if I practice in Leavenworth - who do I see my patient base as being? I talked about the demographic make-up of the county, etc.

Then she asked me if I could get the ear of one politician - what would I say about health care reform? I presented BOTH sides of the argument very logicially ("I see the point of patients who cannot afford PET scans without insurance, but I also understand that medicine is a business and doctors must be able to put food on the table too"). Then I stated my opinion. Then I said what I would say to the politician and what I would do.

Next we had a LONG discussion about how I am older, how I am married, and how I could handle being in class with people 8-9 years younger and in a different place in life as me. We talked about my support system - the difficulties of going back to school, etc. It was actually a GREAT discussion.

Then that interview was over too. It seemed like they were way too short, honestly. 🙂

I hope this helps, guys!
 
Hi, guys.
Moose - I'm glad I didn't have YOUR interviewer!!!! Jeez!!!

My interviews were a little different. I prepared for everything by reading EVERY post on the interview feedback forum. I also researched answers to ethical questions - what doctors actually do. I also keep up on the news every day anyway, so I knew what was going on with health care reform.

My first interview was with a PhD who teaches anatomy. His first question - before I even got sat down - was "Tell me why you want to be a doctor" I basically just elaborated on what I said in my personal statement.

Then we just had a casual conversation about stuff in my application - where I went to school, what I do for fun, where I lived before (Albuquerque), and things I did in my previous career as an engineer.

Then he asked me the ethical question. "Suppose you are a 3rd year student and you stay up all night with a patient. You see another 3rd year fudge Hematocrit values in the patient's chart. What do you do?" I said I would obviously give my colleague the benefit of the doubt - he has been up all night with me and mistakes can happen! The interviewer said "Ok, but you discover that he has flat-out lied to look good to the attending. What do you do?" My response was basically shock and I said that patient care comes FIRST - ahead of "looking good" and he seemed to like what I said.

Next, he asked me if I could invite any 3 people - living or dead - to dinner, who would it be? I said I'd invite Stephen Hawking - a renowned physicist and author of several books - his research has been fundamental to our understanding of the universe - but he is also a quadrapalegic (?sp?). Next, I would invite Pres. Obama because I respect his opinions and all that he has overcome to be the first African American president. Then, I said I would invite my husband. 🙂 That got us into a conversation about what my husband does and our lives together.

Then, he asked me - based on my work experience - what is one thing I liked and one thing I would change about how doctors interact with patients. I used specific examples of particular patients and doctors (of course I stayed within HIPAA rules and left out names and certain details). That got us into a discussion of health care reform.

By that time, the interview was over.

My next interview was with another PhD. It was supposed to be with 2 people, but 1 of them couldn't make it.

She asked me "Tell me something that I don't know from your application." I talked about how I left the KC area to go live in New Mexico and how much I missed HOME. I talked about how much I LOVE living here again and how my husband and I don't want to leave. I talked about how much I LOVE living on my mini-farm in Leavenworth County. (WARNING: THIS WAS ALL 100% TRUE). That got us into a discussion of Leavenworth County - she lives there too.

She asked me when I am a doctor, if I practice in Leavenworth - who do I see my patient base as being? I talked about the demographic make-up of the county, etc.

Then she asked me if I could get the ear of one politician - what would I say about health care reform? I presented BOTH sides of the argument very logicially ("I see the point of patients who cannot afford PET scans without insurance, but I also understand that medicine is a business and doctors must be able to put food on the table too"). Then I stated my opinion. Then I said what I would say to the politician and what I would do.

Next we had a LONG discussion about how I am older, how I am married, and how I could handle being in class with people 8-9 years younger and in a different place in life as me. We talked about my support system - the difficulties of going back to school, etc. It was actually a GREAT discussion.

Then that interview was over too. It seemed like they were way too short, honestly. 🙂

I hope this helps, guys!

Yeah that helps a lot. Thanks! It's always good to hear how people answered the questions rather than just what the questions are.
 
What they actually asked was for me to discuss an issue that apparently took place in Texas where there was a push to make it required by law for women. They wanted to know if I agreed with that or if I thought an alternative would be better; I was also asked to talk about why I thought it was that women but not men who would potentially be required to be vaccinated and if I agreed with that.

So, they gave you some background about the issue before asking about it. It wasn't really like "So, what's your stance on the proposed legislation regarding HPV vaccines?"

And Engineer2MD, Thanks a lot for your post as well, I also agree that it is beneficial to hear the responses of accepted applicants to the questions. I'm starting to feel more confident about my interview after reading things on the SDN.
 
So, they gave you some background about the issue before asking about it. It wasn't really like "So, what's your stance on the proposed legislation regarding HPV vaccines?"

And Engineer2MD, Thanks a lot for your post as well, I also agree that it is beneficial to hear the responses of accepted applicants to the questions. I'm starting to feel more confident about my interview after reading things on the SDN.

No background on the issue was given. They just said that in Texas there was proposed legislation to require it, then they asked me how I feel about it. The Texas example was just to suggest that it is an actual concern, not a hypothetical.
 
I am RD for KU, In-state... are they starting to send out interview invites for RD yet? If so, when was your file complete? Mine was a bit late, 9/18 I believe... so I'm just wondering how long this is going to take. I'm guessing end of November/December.
 
Lol, you'll be fine. You were complete on 9/18... For KU you'll need a bit of patience. But you'll be happy to know that they haven't sent out official invites for RD...not even for October. So you never know.
 
Has anyone who has been accepted via EDP checked the MEDS page recently? Mine is back to saying that I have been invited for an interview, dated 9/04/09. Also, did any of you get a hard copy of a letter via snail mail stating your acceptance?? I should not be worrying, I know, but I am!! Now I have to wait until Monday to see what's going on!

Grrrr...
 
Lol they are probably just fixing all the errors. Why are you still checking the meds page? I guess you're just antsy to know what's next...that's the downfall of edp you know really early...and then delay your excitemeent for 9 months.
 
Has anyone who has been accepted via EDP checked the MEDS page recently? Mine is back to saying that I have been invited for an interview, dated 9/04/09. Also, did any of you get a hard copy of a letter via snail mail stating your acceptance?? I should not be worrying, I know, but I am!! Now I have to wait until Monday to see what's going on!

Grrrr...


.................seriously?

I hope you don't identify yourself next year as your SDN s/n because if I see such neuroticism in real life I'll probably end up punching you in the face. chill out!
 
.................seriously?

I hope you don't identify yourself next year as your SDN s/n because if I see such neuroticism in real life I'll probably end up punching you in the face. chill out!

Thanks for your two cents...

I realize they are probably just fixing the 'class of '09' mistake as UTKD mentioned.

Hope everyone is having a great weekend!
 
Last edited:
.................seriously?

I hope you don't identify yourself next year as your SDN s/n because if I see such neuroticism in real life I'll probably end up punching you in the face. chill out!
..........seriously?
 
“OH looks right I'm right and you're WRONG. me 1, you 0. by the end of our KU Med career, I am going to have sooo many wins against you it's going to be ridiculous.”

“Also, I'm not trying to be competitive or anything. I am trying to help everyone.”

“if I'm accepted in the next few days for EDP, I'll share with everyone the things you need to BS in your interview.”

“For everyone else, I'm gonna post later everything I know about ku med admissions and hopefully it'll help you out!”

“I would give you the questions they asked me, but I'm only sharing that with my RD friends in real life because I want them to have a leg up over their competition. I'd rather have them in my class than strangers on SDN.”

“I hope you don't identify yourself next year as your SDN s/n because if I see such neuroticism in real life I'll probably end up punching you in the face. chill out!”

Are you trying to make friends or enemies here?
 
About the MEDS thing, a friend of mine called last week.

Apparently there was a mistake in communication with AMCAS over the acceptance stuff, which is why it said 2009 initially.

This should just be them fixing it so it is correct again.
 
About the MEDS thing, a friend of mine called last week.

Apparently there was a mistake in communication with AMCAS over the acceptance stuff, which is why it said 2009 initially.

This should just be them fixing it so it is correct again.

Thanks for the insight, RagingMoose.
 
So if the first interviewer presents your file to the admissions committee what is the point of the second interviewer? Do they also fill out an evaluation sheet or something? One presents but there are two evaluations that factor into the committee's decision?
 
So if the first interviewer presents your file to the admissions committee what is the point of the second interviewer? Do they also fill out an evaluation sheet or something? One presents but there are two evaluations that factor into the committee's decision?

Dr. Kallail had explained it in this way. The first interviewer has all the MCAT and GPA numbers on your application and may be subconsciously convinced that a particular candidate is fit to be admitted to medical school. The second interviewers don't have these numbers, would assess the candidate's character, and would provide a more unbiased opinion. They also fill out an evaluation and give it to the first interviewer, the adcom member presenting your file, for additional justification for admittance.

Does anyone know otherwise?
 
Last edited:
Dr. Kalail had explained it in this way. The first interviewer has all the MCAT and GPA numbers on your application and may be subconsciously convinced that a particular candidate is fit to be admitted to medical school. The second interviewers don't have these numbers, would assess the candidate's character, and would provide a more unbiased opinion. They also fill out an evaluation and give it to the first interviewer, the adcom member presenting your file, for additional justification for admittance.

Does anyone know otherwise?

That was my understanding of the process; so impressing the first interviewer is a necessity since they defend your app in front of the whole committee.
 
Ok, so who's interviewing in October?

Raise your hand, please.
 
Last edited:
@ October 26 (no official correspondence yet)
 
Hopefully I'll have an October interview. I think I was complete early enough, but who knows.
 
Ok, I'm 1:30 on Oct 26th, just got the official invitation in the email.
 
You all were originally EDP applicants right? Or are they sending out the invites for RD too? I wanted an Oct interview, but I may have to hold out until Nov/Dec.
 
Yeah more time to perfect my app I guess, and prepare for interviews. Here's to (hopefully) November. Good luck to all Oct people.
 
Do you guys and gals know how the RD decision works?

They take about a month after your interview to let you know rejection, acceptance, or hold 'til march?
 
They give out decisions in about three weeks. They rank everyone from the interview session then accept the top applicants, put the middle ones on hold until March (to compare to the other applicants from other interview sessions that are also on hold) and reject the bottom third or so.
 
Re-interviews for those who were not selected for early decision are in January right?
 
Pkp

yes, January

Did it not work out for you and edp?
 
Thanks and yes you are correct.

Really at a loss as to why though. Literally everything on my application is competitive (stats, EC's, volunteering, shadowing, leadership experiences etc..) and I thought my interview went great. I have a phone appt with Dean McCurdy on Oct 14th to discuss why I wasn't offered a spot. Hopefully, it is something I can fix for the regular decision process. In the mean time Ill be applying to some other schools as well as a couple D.O. schools. Im probably too late but oh well at least I can say I tried!
 
Last edited:
btw, jaydoc, I think that's complete bull**** you didn't get an EDP interview after being the NEXT person on the list to make it last year. are you kidding me!? wow, man, that is so heartless. ugghh, did you apply to more schools? at least you knew to apply elsewhere in the beginning of September. they could have screwed you even more by giving an EDP interview and then rejecting you. if that happened, you wouldn't be able to apply elsewhere until early October and would be really screwed. you should be okay, though, if you sent out your apps last month.

did you speak with Sandy as to why you didn't get an EDP interview after being the NEXT person on the acceptance list for last year?

trying to look at it objectively, how did you spend your time between when you interviewed last year and now? they must not have liked what you were most recently doing. that's the only thing I can come up with as to why they wouldn't grant you an EDP interview...
 

haha why did you delete your post?

I keep editing and deleting my posts on here, too. I type out this huge post that I think will really help ppl, but then I realize I am probably giving out too much.
 
Last edited:
Lol Jayhawk1. That was quite the post to just erase. 😉

lol, oops. I've done that like 5 times now over the past month. Yes, I would share some good info even before my own EDP interview. I would go back and delete it back then b/c I realized I need to make sure I get in first haha. However, now, I realize that info might cause destruction in the wrong hands...hahaha
 
Is the information you have that much different from the hundreds of helpful posts already on SDN?
 
lol this is entertaining. helping to cure my boredom at work.
 
No we're just blabbing on b/c we're bored with how long it takes to get accepted and then actually go to medical school.
 
Yesterday I was so aggravated with my own neuroticism that I accidentally punched myself in the face...... I then immediately gave my hand an evil stare and said "....seriously...i mean c'mon! " 😉
 
the waiting game is ku's favorite game to play
 
Yesterday I was so aggravated with my own neuroticism that I accidentally punched myself in the face...... I then immediately gave my hand an evil stare and said "....seriously...i mean c'mon! " 😉
Haha, I get it.:idea:
 
By the way Jaydoc, well said...well said. Just judging from your posts on the SDN, you're probably the most mature and deserving of us--and not just because you had an unfortunate spot on the wait list last time around.
 
By the way Jaydoc, well said...well said. Just judging from your posts on the SDN, you're probably the most mature and deserving of us--and not just because you had an unfortunate spot on the wait list last time around.


Agreed x 100
 
Wow, this thread is dying. It was fun before EDP decisions but now it's just dead. I have a feeling it'll stay that way from now on considering last years posters were mostly RDers and it only went up to page 4. 🙁
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top