I flat out don't think there's any correlation between grades and how good of a clinician a person is.
I would think the only reason to care would be residencies, since they actually still look at grades & class rank.
Although I've now been told by multiple professors that getting in to residency programs is more about networking & feet on the ground than it is about grades. But, that doesn't mean the grades are insignificant, either.
For all these people who are decrying "comparing grades" by seeking them out -- in most of my pre-req classes, they *post* the mean, median and distribution for each test. One of my classes straight up posted individual rankings, with names attached. It's not like I've gone chasing people down for grade gossip (if anyone here does that, then you're a brat).
For me, it's helpful to know grade distribution information, because it helps me gauge my *own understanding of the material*. It's more of an "ah cool, will relax a little bit for next test", or "ok clearly wasn't just me who thought that test was designed by monsters", or "oh ****, guess I need to stay off the interwebs a little more before the next exam". It has literally nothing to do with competing with other people.
(This may be helped along by the fact that none of my classes curve, either, so if everyone help each other and learns the material, everybody wins. But also, I'm not a competitive person by nature.)
Sent from my Nexus 5X using
SDN mobile