It’s a general tone from her posts like this:
Like I get it, she’s trying to account for everything but it just feels like she’s hesitant to take a firm position. Gives a sort of hedgy feeling like her thoughts on fluffy above.
I mean it depends on how wolves are rolled in this game, because honestly their character would be a weird as hell wolf lmao.
Actually that was one of the posts from her that I liked. The first sentence read to me more like a transition statement as she responded and the second sentence is a point that she made at least two or three times leading up to yeet close, so I like that she's been standing her ground on it.
But you don’t think she lied about her flavor?
She did not, I checked her because of the factionless shenanigans day 1, and she correctly responded to my question
She reads as village, maybe even neutral to me since this is pretty much how she played last game. I realize I completely flipped the script on her as seeming wolfy for these exact reasons, but this just seems like her play style.
Any reasoning behind this yeet?
Yes, I already stated it twice today
I get this, but this is basically how I play. I like to line out all possibilities I can think of publicly but also say which one I agree with the most/lean towards, or if I have no idea. I like this because in case I die and never get to say the theory, it allows some other villagers to think it over + it allows me to see who likes what/dislikes what/ignores what and make further guesses. There are very few cases where I keep something to my chest (i.e. I really think revealing it would hurt village/my faction/etc). It seemed to work decently in my first game so I'm keeping it. I'm not going to pretend that I don't think it'd be a decent strat if I ever played a wolf in a game and could pull it off. That's part of why I chose to play that way in my first game.
Sorry I must've missed them. Doing an ISO now...
Hmm I'm trying to figure out where the switch from Nate strongly questioning those defending zuri to not liking that zuri was leading?
Nate was asking why Santy was speaking on behalf of zuri as his manatee. He seemed pretty sussed on zuri
But then switched to not wanting zuri in the lead? I tried to find where this switch happened but I can't seem to find it. Either that, or his reasoning was weak.
I don't see anywhere in that comment where Nate was saying zuri was sus? He was talking more about Santy defending his townreads.
He wasn't sussing on zuri, he wanted to confirm that Santy was townreading zuri.
I can see that. But many of the other players have been throwing references to previous games left and right as justification for questioning each others' play styles. It's been helpful to see the analyses by the veteran players who can recognize patterns in others' play styles. only have 1 previous game to go off of that happened fairly recently, so I'm assuming that players in that game would play similarly to how they played just a couple weeks ago?
Ah. Thank you for clarifying. It just stuck out to me that he wasn't clearing zuri as town but also skeptical of those voting for him.
Also this only stuck out to me when I did an ISO on genny to see their reasoning for voting Nate. Then I did an ISO on Nate to see if there was any substance to it. I wanted to see if anyone noticed anything weird to justify genny's vote. Genny is high on my POE so I'm reluctant to agree with their line of thinking. I have a similar approach to wonda of thinking out loud.
Remember that genny is outted so literally everything she does is WIFOM.
Remember I haven’t flipped and you don’t know jackRemember that genny is outted so literally everything she does is WIFOM.
There is a nonzero likelihood you are alpha, so my approach atm at least is to treat everything you say as if you were wolf... just in case, you know, you are actually wolf.
Actually, I think the opposite would have been sketchier: if Nate was clearing Zuri as village; that would mean he had some insider knowledge (like being a wolf). I don’t get why Nate being concerned strikes others as wolfy; wiisp was also saying stuff like “Zuri is probably town” and didn’t move his vote to change the situation.
That’s great, except I’m not a wolf, so if you use anything I say or do as evidence that someone else is a wolf, your calculations will be off. So continuing to analyze my interactions is probably useless.
I think this post is the towniest thing from genny all game
How about a vote, my son?
He's one of the people I thought had a weird handling of zuri.
Weird in what way?He's one of the people I thought had a weird handling of zuri.
Stuff like asking zuri how he felt about genny then saying he village read zuri for maintaining his village read on genny.
Hmmm so are you thinking that the plan may have been for zuri to flip village and take heat off genny and Nate?
What does DND have to do with yeeting April?
I also think the frustration was genuine, regardless of aff. There are other stuff to reach the conclussion that zuri is likely village methinks
I don't know. I don't often think in these types of what-ifs.
But why? It made sense to me. A wolf would have tried to self prez no matter what. Nate was just pointing out that Zuri’s reluctance to self prez leans him more village.
I've seen wolves either forget to or deliberately avoid self-prezzing numerous times. At this point though, I'm just focusing on Lawpy to see what he brings.
My reasons largely pertain to Nates’s vote placement on the genny wagon.
Did Nate actually say that and I missed it? I just remember him basically being like "still don't think Zuri should be yeeted" but standing back and letting it happen anyway
Id be hilarious if she was the horse Genny hid under
He did, before the 3-way tie. Zuri was winning with 6 votes for a while and Genny had 5 at the time I think.
Well arrows didn't rain down on me and I'm not dead so I hope it was just some random NPC horse lol
