Fire Emblem: Three HoWWses Game Thread

[Lawpy]

---

Members don't see this ad.

I lost my place in the thread, hold pls

 

[StartingoverVet]

I have been thinking much about this item issue,
a question is asked the mods and AM gets the answer.
it is a good question,
AM withholds the information,
when someone finally brings up the question digging it out from yesterday, and I follow up, “suddenly” AM remebers she had the info,
then gives us the answer that keeps us not suspicious of other adfiliatites which if there are wolves among the villagers would be good to hide.

I find AM suddenly remembering that info awfully wolfy. And who forgets mod information given to you unless you have a ton of information coming at you, like in the wolf chat, I think they decided to ignore it until it was brought up.

I‘m not sure I want to mess up this lynch because I think we have some good wolf candidates, but I want to lynch AM tomorrow.

 

[justafluff]

She said soft vouch, not hard vouch. I listed two other games in immediate recent history when she soft vouched for the game winning scum. I see multiple affiliation combinations. If you don't want to vote him, that's fine. But I need a REAL vouch.

I mentioned 99% certain with the info I have from you. I'm not a wolf, so Nate isn't either. That's your hard vouch.

 

[WildZoo]

I highlighted one post that rubbed me the wrong way in particular, but I feel like they're coasting and not offering many original thoughts.

Could you point to where you talked about that post? I tried ISOing you but you might be able to find it easier since you'll have a better idea of when you posted it.

 

[Santygrass]

She said soft vouch, not hard vouch. I listed two other games in immediate recent history when she soft vouched for the game winning scum. I see multiple affiliation combinations. If you don't want to vote him, that's fine. But I need a REAL vouch.

I dont care aout recent history lol.

You know fluff has a list with allies. If she isnt scum, what reason would she have to soft for Nate?

Like, its a super basic thought I feel like? Or Im the crazy one been super weirded out by this not being the basic thought? If you sus Nate, then sus fluff too and she should be the vote, not Nate in any case /shrug

 

[potentialsheltervet]

I have been thinking much about this item issue,
a question is asked the mods and AM gets the answer.
it is a good question,
AM withholds the information,
when someone finally brings up the question digging it out from yesterday, and I follow up, “suddenly” AM remebers she had the info,
then gives us the answer that keeps us not suspicious of other adfiliatites which if there are wolves among the villagers would be good to hide.

I find AM suddenly remembering that info awfully wolfy. And who forgets mod information given to you unless you have a ton of information coming at you, like in the wolf chat, I think they decided to ignore it until it was brought up.

I‘m not sure I want to mess up this lynch because I think we have some good wolf candidates, but I want to lynch AM tomorrow.

Wait, huh??

 

[Lawpy]

In a world where there are no conversions?
In a world where there are and PSV has a habit of bringing up TMI-type things as a wolf because it's what she would do as a villager?
I don't think her bringing up conversion is AI

Yep i agree with this

 

[WildZoo]

I have been thinking much about this item issue,
a question is asked the mods and AM gets the answer.
it is a good question,
AM withholds the information,
when someone finally brings up the question digging it out from yesterday, and I follow up, “suddenly” AM remebers she had the info,
then gives us the answer that keeps us not suspicious of other adfiliatites which if there are wolves among the villagers would be good to hide.

I find AM suddenly remembering that info awfully wolfy. And who forgets mod information given to you unless you have a ton of information coming at you, like in the wolf chat, I think they decided to ignore it until it was brought up.

I‘m not sure I want to mess up this lynch because I think we have some good wolf candidates, but I want to lynch AM tomorrow.

Honestly I think it's perfectly in character for AM to ignore a completely out of context vague message from the mods. What reason would she have had to bring it up before April mentioned that the answer goes to someone else?

 

[Aprilthearab]

I have been thinking much about this item issue,
a question is asked the mods and AM gets the answer.
it is a good question,
AM withholds the information,
when someone finally brings up the question digging it out from yesterday, and I follow up, “suddenly” AM remebers she had the info,
then gives us the answer that keeps us not suspicious of other adfiliatites which if there are wolves among the villagers would be good to hide.

I find AM suddenly remembering that info awfully wolfy. And who forgets mod information given to you unless you have a ton of information coming at you, like in the wolf chat, I think they decided to ignore it until it was brought up.

I‘m not sure I want to mess up this lynch because I think we have some good wolf candidates, but I want to lynch AM tomorrow.

To be fair, this definitely would not be the first time that AM hasn't understood something she received in PMs, so it could be genuine

 

[Lawpy]

Actually

Unyeet Santy
Yeet psv


MMaybe something exciting will happen

Why is Aprils mad 🙁

 

[potentialsheltervet]

I hate this post. It feels super safe to just say I'm sus.
Also the fluff 3p chatter is making me 😡

Here we are

 

[StartingoverVet]

Honestly I think it's perfectly in character for AM to ignore a completely out of context vague message from the mods. What reason would she have had to bring it up before April mentioned that the answer goes to someone else?

Because no one should ignore information like that. You might not believe it but it is almost 100% a village duty to bring it up for discussion. “Got this weird message not sure we should believe it”

 

[holdthemayo]

Two extremely high posters were subbed in lol

Mom pls, I'm hardly two high posters

 

[Aprilthearab]

Why is Aprils mad 🙁

No three way ties pls

 

[justafluff]

I have been thinking much about this item issue,
a question is asked the mods and AM gets the answer.
it is a good question,
AM withholds the information,
when someone finally brings up the question digging it out from yesterday, and I follow up, “suddenly” AM remebers she had the info,
then gives us the answer that keeps us not suspicious of other adfiliatites which if there are wolves among the villagers would be good to hide.

I find AM suddenly remembering that info awfully wolfy. And who forgets mod information given to you unless you have a ton of information coming at you, like in the wolf chat, I think they decided to ignore it until it was brought up.

I‘m not sure I want to mess up this lynch because I think we have some good wolf candidates, but I want to lynch AM tomorrow.

My thought about it was that she's the one getting the answers always, right? As the pre selected player, as long as this item is going around. So outing that on thread would put her in danger.

 

[Lawpy]

Okay , so....

April/PSV
AM/Veggie

Who is howling more

I don’t understand AM/veggies

 

[WildZoo]

Yes. If fluff is a wolf, Zenge is not. If Zenge is a wolf, I seriously doubt fluff is.

Oops I meant to respond to this.
How would you feel about Zenge if fluff flipped village? and vice versa?

 

[StartingoverVet]

I mentioned 99% certain with the info I have from you. I'm not a wolf, so Nate isn't either. That's your hard vouch.

If you are basing that vouch on affiliation that can’t be a hard vouch, just saying.

 

[Wondalfy]

Also, I always feel guilty about tunneling people so: sorry PSV. But also kinda weird you haven't interacted with me once despite throwing some heavy sus 😅

 

[justafluff]

Honestly I think it's perfectly in character for AM to ignore a completely out of context vague message from the mods. What reason would she have had to bring it up before April mentioned that the answer goes to someone else?

Not to mention that, she could just stay silent about it even after it was brought up.

 

[Animal Midwife]

I mentioned 99% certain with the info I have from you. I'm not a wolf, so Nate isn't either. That's your hard vouch.

I don't understand the connection still. All that question affirmed is that there's one pack. 🤔

 

[potentialsheltervet]

Oops I meant to respond to this.
How would you feel about Zenge if fluff flipped village? and vice versa?

If fluff flipped village, definitely much more sus of Zenge.
If Zenge flipped village, probably feel about the same toward fluff.

 

[WildZoo]

Because no one should ignore information like that. You might not believe it but it is almost 100% a village duty to bring it up for discussion. “Got this weird message not sure we should believe it”

My impression was not that there was any context given to it though. Like it didn't seem like it was an outright "Wolves are one faction" statement.

 

[justafluff]

If you are basing that vouch on affiliation that can’t be a hard vouch, just saying.

Hard soft whatever. I really don't think Nate's a wolf.

 

[StartingoverVet]

I don’t understand AM/veggies

Me neither. Veggie seems ”mostly harmless”

 

[Lawpy]

Fwiw , this is me compeltely side-eyeing the AM read on Veggie with lack of reeval at this point still + Having fluff vouching on Nate and not showing wavering.

Plus AM and Veggie are just very aligned in views I feel like 🤔

And April/PSV are both PoE that feel like both dancing around each other and trying to make dirt seeds grow around. But maybe this part is more confbiased

AM earlier mentioned she’s village reading veggies because she liked veggies defense

But… still not really seeing how they’re aligned in views

 

[potentialsheltervet]

Also, I always feel guilty about tunneling people so: sorry PSV. But also kinda weird you haven't interacted with me once despite throwing some heavy sus 😅

I'm reading your posts, I just haven't been online the same time as you

 

[NateTheLesser]

I mentioned 99% certain with the info I have from you. I'm not a wolf, so Nate isn't either. That's your hard vouch.

(Well. We're still trying to figure out if the answer she got means what we hope it means)

 

[potentialsheltervet]

Hard soft whatever.

*Insert oh my gif*

 

[Santygrass]

If you are basing that vouch on affiliation that can’t be a hard vouch, just saying.

Fluff claimed to know who their allies were

*Dies*

 

[StartingoverVet]

My impression was not that there was any context given to it though. Like it didn't seem like it was an outright "Wolves are one faction" statement.

Idk. It would piss me off if she sat on a mod message like that as a villager. What is the point of having information if you don’t share it? Can’t let your biases ruin the balance of game for villagers.

 

[Animal Midwife]

I dont care aout recent history lol.

You know fluff has a list with allies. If she isnt scum, what reason would she have to soft for Nate?

Like, its a super basic thought I feel like? Or Im the crazy one been super weirded out by this not being the basic thought? If you sus Nate, then sus fluff too and she should be the vote, not Nate in any case /shrug

I mean, when SAR vouched for fluff she said it had 0% to do with affiliation so I'm deeply skeptical that fluff somehow got more info from a line that is barely more useful than what's in the OP.

 

[Santygrass]

AM earlier mentioned she’s village reading veggies because she liked veggies defense

But… still not really seeing how they’re aligned in views

Look who are they voting

 

[Wiisp]

this is probably irrelevant, but since AM brought it, what exactly was the soft vouch that was on a wolf made by fluff in a previous game.
tbf I have a soft vouch, but I've also had no reason to out that info yet, so its a bit harder for me to see my voting fluff or Nate...

 

[Lawpy]

I am sus of veggie so this is intriguing.

Why?

I highlighted one post that rubbed me the wrong way in particular, but I feel like they're coasting and not offering many original thoughts.

Could you kindly direct me to what post you highlighted? Sorry i missed it

 

[justafluff]

I don't understand the connection still. All that question affirmed is that there's one pack. 🤔

The connection is that I know my allies. I didn't know if, amongst them, there were some that are wolves, so I was being careful. But if the wolves are a faction of their own, and not dispersed into the three houses or other factions in this game, I'm pretty confident my allies are the same as me.

 

[potentialsheltervet]

this is probably irrelevant, but since AM brought it, what exactly was the soft vouch that was on a wolf made by fluff in a previous game.
tbf I have a soft vouch, but I've also had no reason to out that info yet, so its a bit harder for me to see my voting fluff or Nate...

I don't know about the wolf one, but fluff was ready to die for me recently because she thought I was village.
Unfortunately I was not.

 

[VeggieTrex]

Because no one should ignore information like that. You might not believe it but it is almost 100% a village duty to bring it up for discussion. “Got this weird message not sure we should believe it”

I disagree with this for the same reason I disagree with revealing any information about role PMs, you don't know if it can be used against you. Context matters to PMs and if it was unexpected you may want to wait to find out that context.

 

[StartingoverVet]

Fluff claimed to know who their allies were

*Dies*

But we haven’t determined if that is good enough to know they are village. I believe she knows her Allies for sure. I don’t believe we can use that to determine villagerness. I am assuming that it is true, but that is a very soft vouch.

 

[NateTheLesser]

Honestly I think it's perfectly in character for AM to ignore a completely out of context vague message from the mods. What reason would she have had to bring it up before April mentioned that the answer goes to someone else?

(Yeah to be fair, when April said the answer went out immediately I was like "oh **** did I miss a PM" and checked 😆)

 

[potentialsheltervet]

Could you kindly direct me to what post you highlighted? Sorry i missed it

I posted it again further up on this page.

 

[WildZoo]

Here we are

Oh. I guess I just like...don't have a problem with that post lol

 

[justafluff]

this is probably irrelevant, but since AM brought it, what exactly was the soft vouch that was on a wolf made by fluff in a previous game.
tbf I have a soft vouch, but I've also had no reason to out that info yet, so its a bit harder for me to see my voting fluff or Nate...

I never vouched for anyone. I was just defending Zuri in the noob game and he ended up being a wolf. And defended PSV in a previous game and she ended up being a cult leader. But I didn't vouch for them with the certainty I have now.

 

[Wiisp]

I never vouched for anyone. I was just defending Zuri in the noob game and he ended up being a wolf. And defended PSV in a previous game and she ended up being a cult leader. But I didn't vouch for them with the certainty I have now.

thanks for the response, beign wrong and vouching certainly isn't the same thing

 

[potentialsheltervet]

Oh. I guess I just like...don't have a problem with that post lol

I mean, there's a bit of OMGUS probably since I am the person in question lol

 

[Santygrass]

But we haven’t determined if that is good enough to know they are village. I believe she knows her Allies for sure. I don’t believe we can use that to determine villagerness. I am assuming that it is true, but that is a very soft vouch.

Yes we can. Kindof.

Because they are either both scum, or both village. In any case, there is never a scenario with Scum!Nate and Villa!Fluff.

And we have Sar with a type of vouch in Fluff. So like, I think it really adds up of them being a faction.

So Idc if they are the mot antivilla faction to ever exist, I highly doubt they are wolves, and even if they are they are kinda doomed and mostly outed, so the lie would fall off super easily IMO.
Not a Priority at all today and idk if its the heat or what but Im getting too much heated on this and should cool off

 

[holdthemayo]

I’d rather not talk about it more than I have to.

Fluff has stated to know who are their allies.

If she is vouching for someone, eithr they are both wolves, or both from the same faction.

Simple as is. Why are people so dense smh

I'm not sure what you are going for here.

I'm hoping this is helpful

I have been thinking much about this item issue,
a question is asked the mods and AM gets the answer.
it is a good question,
AM withholds the information,
when someone finally brings up the question digging it out from yesterday, and I follow up, “suddenly” AM remebers she had the info,
then gives us the answer that keeps us not suspicious of other adfiliatites which if there are wolves among the villagers would be good to hide.

I find AM suddenly remembering that info awfully wolfy. And who forgets mod information given to you unless you have a ton of information coming at you, like in the wolf chat, I think they decided to ignore it until it was brought up.

I‘m not sure I want to mess up this lynch because I think we have some good wolf candidates, but I want to lynch AM tomorrow.

Is AM your top wolf read then? Is that where you would prefer to vote?

 

[StartingoverVet]

I disagree with this for the same reason I disagree with revealing any information about role PMs, you don't know if it can be used against you. Context matters to PMs and if it was unexpected you may want to wait to find out that context.

that is bad village play, village wins with more sharing of information, cause wolves have a info imbalance. You find a way to get it out there And get it in play. It is the fun of roles. If I were a seer (which sadly I am not) I don’t go blurting out I am a seer, but I find ways to use the information I am receiving without being obvious,

In general, the more exchange of informatjon, the better for the village. There is over sharing for sure. This isn’t close IMO.

 

[Lawpy]

There's zero reason to re-eval veggie when she's done nothing I don't like and it's literally D2.

Outside of me being wary of fluff in general, I'm not interested in a vouch she can't explain to me when I watched her vouch for zuri last game and PSV the game before it.

I also don't trust PSV either.

"A vouch she cant even explain "

.
.
.

ARE WE READING THE SAME GAME ANIMAL MIDWIFE!?!?

Yes.

Fluff has stated to know who are their allies.

If she is vouching for someone, eithr they are both wolves, or both from the same faction.

Simple as is. Why are people so dense smh

Well slight eyebrows raised on AM, because i understood what Santy and fluffy are getting at.

 

[Zenge142]

Oh. I guess I just like...don't have a problem with that post lol

Yeah it seemed fine to me too.

Can you remind me, have you correctly wolf read PSV in the past? Because I feel like I’m frequently wrong on her