I listed my tinfoil that they were conspiring and look at that, they were just not as wolves. Mel is leaning more village after this whole ****show
Lol, congrats, you picked up they were conspiring. They do that every game more or less.
Like I said I'm moving on from you for now - which I would define as the opposite of stuck - though yes you are still on my list - everyone is on my list minus coffee. Wide enough net
Mm, I was calling you out on the tails of you voting me, so if you've moved on from that, that's the first I'm hearing of it. Good to know you're considering others. Although, everyone but Coffee? That might be a bit too wide. At some point you may need to consider who might be village.
"sure, there's the whole wolf in plain sight thing, and I would never point to my activity as a sign of being village because it's NAI. I would point to the fact that I think a lot of my advice is pro-village and if I were a wolf I just wouldn't have to try that hard. I think that"
Is the last sentence here finished?
No, I went on to explain what I'm doing to help the village and a defense, so basically I did end up finishing it.
Questions-
What's fake tunneling?
What do you mean by town leaders?
Youre telling me to ask Lupin about you when you made multiple post about how you dont trust her? Has this changed?
Tunneling is when it seems a player is overly fixated on one or only a few suspects. There is no perfect definition when you see this. Consensus though is that as long as there is reason to believe there is more than one wolf, especially originals, that more suspects
must be considered for optimal hunting.
Fake tunneling is used by wolves as camouflage. This is because villagers tend to be prone to tunnelling. (Why? As uninformed majority it can be easy for a player to sort of anchor in their thinking, by not having much to go on or very little, any piece of data or the like can become inflated in a villager's mind, this gets into some classic cognitive biases). The other reason though, is because it allows the wolf to be lazy. They don't have to alienate more players than the tunnell-ee by voting them or making arguments against more players. They don't have to come up with more "analysis" and risk being caught up in lies or contradictions. They don't have to do more to consider how their VCA looks in isolation or compared to their wolfy buddies. Sometimes this means they are associated with less lynch deaths depending on who they are tunnelling and whether or not that player actually dies. This can make it easier to look like they are not just following the lynch mob. Lastly, and I believe there is info to back this up, there is a psychological thing that the more you post someone's name and the word the wolf, the more likely others are to read that and come to that association. So sometimes a fake tunnelling wolf is doing that just to get a mislynch.
Since genuine tunnelling on the part of a villager is so unhelpful, and can be used by wolves to be lazy, one way to wolf hunt is to encourage everyone to get out of their tunnels. It helps the villagers who are tunnelling, but it also pushes wolves for more data points and chances to put their foots in their mouths.
As far as what I said about Lupin, even if you suspect someone, doesn't mean you're correct. Also, if called upon sometimes wolves will be forced to confirm something factual or something they can't get away with a lie about. Obviously it doesn't help you if others don't believe them or they flip wolf.
As far as calling upon her to confirm that I was not trying to pocket her, here's a pro tip, writing a 9 point bulletin on why your PM partner is a wolf and voting them, is kinda the opposite of pocketing them, again why I was able to make the case that I was not pocketing her by PM.
I'm sure even that's been used to try to pocket someone through reverse psychology WIFOM. Point is, that wasn't terribly pockety on my part. Also, I was inviting her to engage in the thread.
I came to thread and said that after I accused her of being a wolf, she stopped talking to me. She hasn't contradicted that. I think my point stands that I haven't tried to pocket those players.
In regards to quieter players, I cannot make a read on them, as there is nothing to read. So do you want detailed reads or do you want me to be more suspicious of silence and lurkers who I have no reasons for?
How are you reading Bryndi & MJ?
My list
Lupin - feeling charmed and pocketed
Dina - just saw an amazing wolf play by her, could definitely be a wolf this game. But I also think her appearances/behavior is NAI
Kara - neutral - previously stated
Mel - village - stuck on Kara, seems more insightful as a wolf (no offense)
Stagg - previously stated village lean reevaluated neutral, since WZ's NK could lean more wolf here -
Capri - neutral - never really see much from her, definitely more substance this game which could be NAI
Snowy - village lean - making good points on thread, seems fine in PM too
Genny & Skimble - weary of both, neutral but likely leaning more wolf for both - need to ISO & reread their posts
I dont know anyone belows meta -
MSU - seems normal, i think in the past she has posted more non-game related things but may just have been based on rl things, neutral
Killer - usually village but always sketches me out - must be the name - leaving the resurrected alone for now
Cubs - noob - seems to be following others - possibly NAI, could be wolfy
Weim - not familiar with her play, here her lurking seems opportunistic and sketchy
The missing from your HW -
MJ - selective mute = NAI
Bryndi - around, still thinking about d1 tie but willing to see more from her, probably need to ISO
Ski - welcome back - actually enjoy her play, good wolf hunter and am glad shes back - leaving the resurrected alone for now
Gone but not forgotten
Dubz - village
SAR - village
Cray - please read my posts many questions in here have been answered and I just did the repetiveness with AM and she was non-village. I feel like my points on you were outlined clearly.
I'm not saying it is your activity, its how your tone reads and the content (minus the teaching I like that part and its NAI to me).
My village worldview crumbles with each death, so yes it will if you flip village too.
I love WW homework - so plese check my work and give non-biased feedback teac'
*Though, last time I got WW HW was in Space from wolfator Mel. So light sketch points to you jbs
Here's the thing. How well do you know my tone to know that it is off? Sometimes I detect a wolfy tone in someone because what they are doing is classically wolfy, or some other signs of deception. Other times, it's because the tone is off for
them. I just don't buy that you know my wolf meta at this point, or have interactive experience with wolfy me. If you don't know me, then you would find me extremely sketch. This probably explains what you are seeing that other more experienced players are not.
Most of your reads are very general. Unfortunately, superficial reads only tells you what is on the surface. And most wolves are able to not come off as such on the surface. I totally get gut reads, but endeavour to find much more specific things, like a particular post or voting pattern or some such, to make your case. Because even if you identify a wolf based on gut, unless a bunch of other villagers are reading you village AND ready to follow your gut reads, then the next part of successful villaging will be to persuade others to your viewpoint. Not that you have to forget a wolf read you believe in, but if you can't get any traction it helps to consider if you are 1) correct when so many others are not agreeing, if not that 2) other candidates.