Official 2009/2010 rank list help thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Interested in GI, no desire to leave the southeast (ever). This is my rank list, made after discussions with my wife:

1. UAB
2. Duke
3. Vanderbilt
4. Virginia
5. MUSC
6. Wake Forest
7. Emory
8. South Alabama
9. Florida (Gainesville)

Thoughts?

Sounds good. Obviously Duke is a better program than UAB, but if you and your wife want to stay at UAB, it certainly is a strong program. A but curious why you would put MUSC and Wake over Emory..But it is almost 100% that you will match at UAB any way, so I wouldn't waste brain power over it.
 
Interested in GI, no desire to leave the southeast (ever). This is my rank list, made after discussions with my wife:

1. UAB
2. Duke
3. Vanderbilt
4. Virginia
5. MUSC
6. Wake Forest
7. Emory
8. South Alabama
9. Florida (Gainesville)

Thoughts?
In all likelihood this won't matter, but I would probably put UF Gainesville above South Alabama unless you really hated UF. Otherwise I don't see anything that's unreasonable.
 
Interested in GI, no desire to leave the southeast (ever). This is my rank list, made after discussions with my wife:

1. UAB
2. Duke
3. Vanderbilt
4. Virginia
5. MUSC
6. Wake Forest
7. Emory
8. South Alabama
9. Florida (Gainesville)

Thoughts?

I'll play, since I found your list confusing. Perhaps you are not a fan of Durham? Duke is the standout on your rank list by far, but maybe you didn't like it and that's why it's behind UAB. But if you want to maximize your GI options (i.e. go to a place like Duke for GI fellowship) Duke would be ideal. UAB is the next strongest program on the list but I'd switch #1 and #2. I'm most confused by why Wake Forest is above Emory. Emory>Wake Forest in national reputation, especially if you want to do GI. Based on prestige, it should be at least in your top 4 or 5.

1. Duke
2. UAB (I love the program, strong fellowship match, but not as strong as Duke)
3. Vanderbilt
4. Emory
5. UVA (#2-5 are fairly = and very strong in my opinion)

The rest, do whatever. I'm assuming that there are very specific reasons why your list is what it is, and it's not totally based on prestige. But if you are going to do GI, that needs to be a big factor in your rankings if you want to optimize fellowship options. I'm not an elitist but fellowship PDs often are. Residency reputation matters...Of course, your wife needs to be happy where you are as well. Good luck.
 
I know I've posted here before. but I can't decide between two places and I wanted to see what you guys think. I'm struggling between Vanderbilt and Columbia. There are so many pros and cons to both programs.

Vandy: I'm from Texas and moving to Nashville will be less stressful for me. I can have a car, people are friendly, life style is closer to what I'm used to. I want to go into Rheum and not only is Dr. Sergent a fabulous advocate for the residents, but he's also a Rheumatologist who will be invaluable in helping me get a fellowship. Also, they seem very supportive to residents and everyone seems very happy there. The ancillary services and EMR are wonderful which will make residency overall less stressful. The weather will also be much warmer and comfortable for me.

The schedule is brutal: 9 months call some months q3. 2 weeks vacation plus 5 days for holidays. Extended time doing overnight call all three years, more ICU months than most other programs etc. Nashville isn't the most happening town, so I may miss some of the amenities of Houston. I'm not sure how much ranking matters (SDN leads me to believe it matters a lot), but Vandy isn't ranked as highly as is Columbia. I think Columbia's name is a bit more impressive to most.

Columbia: The training here seems amazing. The breadth of pathology I'd see in NYC could be unparalleled and the autonomy would be amazing. I have no doubt that I'd become an outstanding clinician after residency there. The fellowship match list from Columbia is consistently impressive. The schedule is reasonable with a front loaded program that tapers off nicely through the years. There is also more emphasis on ambulatory care which will be more useful to me as a future Rheumatologist. NYC is exciting (and scary) and features the best of everything in the world.

Cons: I don't like being cold, I like driving, and I like cheap rent. I can say goodbye to all of these things in NYC. I also doubt I can keep my doggy if I go there (my boyfriend's parents would keep her). The transition from Houston to NYC would be dramatic requiring big adjustments on my part. Now that you can't deffer loans in residency, I'm afraid I wont be able to make loan payments if I live in such an expensive city. I've also heard that the ancillary services at Columbia are very poor which leads to stress for the residents. I've also heard from outsiders that residents tend to be less cohesive and sometimes unhappy (however, this sentiment was not repeated by the current residents).

I think Columbia would offer more opportunities, and more stress. Vandy would be overall less stressful but maybe would not offer quite the quality of clinical training. Febuary 24th is quickly approaching and I still haven't decided. Any advice?

I like Vandy for you Jubes, I really, really do.

Rheum is MUCH less competitive than many other specialties to get into - yes there are many, many more applications than spots, but most of these are FMGs trying to find advanced training. As an AMG the difference coming from Vandy vs Columbia matching into Rheum is essentially NONEXISTENT. So please do not rank Columbia higher simply because you are worried about fellowship placement. Rank these programs based on your gut feeling.
 
So here is my current rank list:

1) BIDMC
2) Tufts
3) Yale
4) Cornell
5) Mount Sinai
6) NYU
7) Brown
8) BU

I really want to be in Boston next year because my fiance is there for at least the next few years and is not flexible to move. I am interested in a fellowship in nephrology eventually with a career in academics. I wanted advice on whether I should switch Tufts and Yale on my list. Here are the pros and cons as I see it:

Tufts:
pros - in Boston, subspecialty services (including a renal service), good nephrology match and nephrology research (especially clinical), no private attendings, small program, good housestaff camaraderie
cons - less strong match in other departments, less patient diversity, less academic, subspecialty services (yes this is a pro and a con)

Yale:
pros - great PD, tons of research money, good nephrology match, very academic, good housestaff camaraderie, opportunity for moonlighting, cheap cost of living
cons - in New Haven!

Thanks in advance!

I'd consider moving BU higher on your list, unless you really didn't care for it as much as the others. As an AMG your fellowship prospects from BU are very, very good . . . and since you want to stay in boston . . .

I like Tufts over Yale simply for your location rationale. Unless you are looking for basic science research in residency (and I promise no one outside of those on research tracks have time for, what you'll get research-wise [think clinical] from Tufts will be similar to Yale)

EDIT: re: BU . . . I should read the thread first. I still like my advice on Tufts vs Yale. Good luck
 
I would agree on a few points; I think the bigger issue is because the attendings in foreign countries tend to expect a lot more from their students and residents; and their temperament may be different. I do see your point and in this case, it may be better you avoid cook county. However, your observations regarding Cook County may not be generalizable to all programs that have FMGs.

What do you guys think of a program like Cleveland Clinic that has many FMGs? Did you get the same type of feeling there when you interviewed there? Any input would be appreciated

I agree with all the point that you all have mentioned above about working with FMGs, as far as WAY higher expectations, higher knowledge base, greater medical experience and just different training culture that we have been brought up in. Having said that, I have heard about the compatitive culture of residents at Cook County!

i'm not sure i'm even convinced about what I said for cook county being cutthroat (as it was based on one morning report during my interview). probably one or two bad apples, but most the residents and fellows are not only wonderful to work with, but excellent clinicians and teachers.

I'm interested in GI

UTSW
UT Houston
OSU
Rush
Loyola
Cincinnati
Miami
USC
VCU
Maryland
Massachusetts

Any help would be greatly appreciated. I'm having a particularly difficult time deciding between Rush and Loyola.

didactics, autonomy, patient diversity, call schedule, and probably research are better at loyola. rush has more central location (though traffic around the parking garage blows), friendly people, tough call schedule and private patients (~10-40% of your list). PM me if you'd like to compare more notes.
 
didactics, autonomy, patient diversity, call schedule, and probably research are better at loyola. rush has more central location (though traffic around the parking garage blows), friendly people, tough call schedule and private patients (~10-40% of your list). PM me if you'd like to compare more notes.

Agreed. The only two things I liked more about Rush are the location (closer to downtown) and the fact the residents seemed more fun (this might be due to the fact they live downtown). There isn't much separating Rush and Loyola but overall I think Loyola > Rush.
 
I'm currently having a hard time deciding between Udub and UTSW as my #1 choice...... i don't plan on going to fellowship as of now and i really want top notch training... it seems like both programs are fairly strenous particularly in the beginning...... any thougths
 
I'm currently having a hard time deciding between Udub and UTSW as my #1 choice...... i don't plan on going to fellowship as of now and i really want top notch training... it seems like both programs are fairly strenous particularly in the beginning...... any thougths


If you are of a more cerebral/research bend, UW is probably better. If you want to feel comfortable being on your own in any kind of disaster situation, I sense UTSW would be the better fit, although I didn't interview there.
 
I'm currently having a hard time deciding between Udub and UTSW as my #1 choice...... i don't plan on going to fellowship as of now and i really want top notch training... it seems like both programs are fairly strenous particularly in the beginning...... any thougths

UW has both great specialty and general medicine options. It is a powerhouse program for sure. Seattle can be annoying if you hate granola (biodegradable cutlery and the whole 9 yards), though. Generally, people that I have talked to have thought of Seattle as a huge plus.

I don't mess with Texas, so I too do not know about UTSW.
 
Last edited:
As i'm finishing up my rank list; really having a tough time between BU and Jefferson. Both seem like solids programs; but has anyone heard anyone heard about the two actually are as workplaces? I'm interested in going into Heme/Onc or ID; and both seem fair in both of those areas (though BU's fellowship match is impressive).
 
I'm currently having a hard time deciding between Udub and UTSW as my #1 choice...... i don't plan on going to fellowship as of now and i really want top notch training... it seems like both programs are fairly strenous particularly in the beginning...... any thougths

Both great programs but UW is the stronger of the two. Plus I love the West Coast and I'm biased. But UW has an amazing reputation both for general internal medicine/primary care and for fellowship, esp if you change your mind and want to stay at UW for fellowship.
 
I'm currently having a hard time deciding between Udub and UTSW as my #1 choice...... i don't plan on going to fellowship as of now and i really want top notch training... it seems like both programs are fairly strenous particularly in the beginning...... any thougths

UTSW tends to have a better reputation, in terms of clinical training, than UW. UTSW grads are considered extremely clinically strong by institutes nationwide, while UW tends to have a very strong regional reputation (just what I have heard in med school and on the trail).
 
UTSW tends to have a better reputation, in terms of clinical training, than UW. UTSW grads are considered extremely clinically strong by institutes nationwide, while UW tends to have a very strong regional reputation (just what I have heard in med school and on the trail).

Hmmm...that's interesting. I heard the opposite. But then again, I have a West Coast bias.🙂
 
UTSW tends to have a better reputation, in terms of clinical training, than UW. UTSW grads are considered extremely clinically strong by institutes nationwide, while UW tends to have a very strong regional reputation (just what I have heard in med school and on the trail).

UW has a strong national reputation.
 
They both have strong national reputations that look a bit stronger in their respective regions. I think of them as in the same category of top public university programs, along with Michigan, UNC, UAB, UCLA, etc (UCSF notwithstanding, of course).

I think grads of UTSW might have an easier time going to Baylor or WashU than a place like Duke or JHU for fellowships, and UW might be better at getting folks to UCSF or Stanford. (This is all conjecture -- I haven't compared match lists or anything).

The only similiarities bw the cities is that they are urban -- Dallas is extremely conservative, Seattle, not so much. Cost of living is lower in Texas (though neither state has a state income tax).

I think as far as prestige, I'd call it a wash. Go to whichever city you'd like, or where you'll be better supported by friends/family.
 
As i'm finishing up my rank list; really having a tough time between BU and Jefferson. Both seem like solids programs; but has anyone heard anyone heard about the two actually are as workplaces? I'm interested in going into Heme/Onc or ID; and both seem fair in both of those areas (though BU's fellowship match is impressive).

For whatever it's worth. BU was the only program where when speaking to the home medical students applying to IM I heard multiple times that they would not be ranking their home program...
 
I like Vandy for you Jubes, I really, really do.

Rheum is MUCH less competitive than many other specialties to get into - yes there are many, many more applications than spots, but most of these are FMGs trying to find advanced training. As an AMG the difference coming from Vandy vs Columbia matching into Rheum is essentially NONEXISTENT. So please do not rank Columbia higher simply because you are worried about fellowship placement. Rank these programs based on your gut feeling.

Yeah, I liked Vandy from the start, and all season long I found myself comparing other programs to Vandy which says a lot. I'm just so nervous to pick a number one and turn the freakin ROL in already!
 
Does anybody know about the benefits for Tufts? They only list last year's pay scale, etc.
Thanks!
 
I'll play, since I found your list confusing. Perhaps you are not a fan of Durham? Duke is the standout on your rank list by far, but maybe you didn't like it and that's why it's behind UAB. But if you want to maximize your GI options (i.e. go to a place like Duke for GI fellowship) Duke would be ideal. UAB is the next strongest program on the list but I'd switch #1 and #2. I'm most confused by why Wake Forest is above Emory. Emory>Wake Forest in national reputation, especially if you want to do GI. Based on prestige, it should be at least in your top 4 or 5.

1. Duke
2. UAB (I love the program, strong fellowship match, but not as strong as Duke)
3. Vanderbilt
4. Emory
5. UVA (#2-5 are fairly = and very strong in my opinion)

The rest, do whatever. I'm assuming that there are very specific reasons why your list is what it is, and it's not totally based on prestige. But if you are going to do GI, that needs to be a big factor in your rankings if you want to optimize fellowship options. I'm not an elitist but fellowship PDs often are. Residency reputation matters...Of course, your wife needs to be happy where you are as well. Good luck.

I actually really liked Duke and the Durham area.

My feelings on the matter might be different if my career goals were different. I don't want to leave the South, and I remain on the fence about academics/private practice. If I were looking for a powerhouse academic career I might switch UAB/Duke, but for my purposes, UAB is the better fit, and my wife is too happy in Birmingham to deal with moving, yet.

As for why Emory so low, it just didn't "feel" right. I felt like I meshed with the residents at Wake/MUSC much better. And I hate Atlanta. A happy resident is a productive resident, and a productive resident gets a fellowship.
 
I actually really liked Duke and the Durham area.

My feelings on the matter might be different if my career goals were different. I don't want to leave the South, and I remain on the fence about academics/private practice. If I were looking for a powerhouse academic career I might switch UAB/Duke, but for my purposes, UAB is the better fit, and my wife is too happy in Birmingham to deal with moving, yet.

As for why Emory so low, it just didn't "feel" right. I felt like I meshed with the residents at Wake/MUSC much better. And I hate Atlanta. A happy resident is a productive resident, and a productive resident gets a fellowship.

Very true...as long as you are comfortable with the UAB GI match list (as far as keeping options open for fellowship if you choose to do that) then go for UAB. You don't want your wife to be miserable, and since regional preferences are so strong when it comes to fellowships, if you went to UAB you wouldn't be at a disadvantage if you wanted to stay in the South. I wish you and your wife the best of luck in the match! 🙂
 
Very true...as long as you are comfortable with the UAB GI match list (as far as keeping options open for fellowship if you choose to do that) then go for UAB. You don't want your wife to be miserable, and since regional preferences are so strong when it comes to fellowships, if you went to UAB you wouldn't be at a disadvantage if you wanted to stay in the South. I wish you and your wife the best of luck in the match! 🙂
👍
 
I figured since everyone else had a thread with BU in the title, I would start a post. I think I have most of my list settled, but there are still a few in the middle and the end that I find myself wavering on. Interested in what non New Yorkers think of Mt. Sinai. For the record, I'm not at all interested in GI, so that wouldn't add much in terms of Mt. Sinai . Interested in strong hands on training, but at the same time would prefer not to be so stressed out that I have no hair at the end of three years.
 
I want to do Pulm/CC and want great clinical training. Geography is not that important. I will try to finish my MPH during residency. Some of you have helped me before and I really appreciate it, but since then I have gone on second looks and this has changed my ROL. So I would appreciate any insight you could give me.

Tentative ROL:

VCU
Louisville
Iowa
Scott & White-Texas A&M
Minnesota
OU-OKC
UT-San Antonio
MetroHealth

On a side note am I putting too much stock in gut feeling? I ask this because my ROL changed a lot after going on second looks.

Thanks in advance.
 
I figured since everyone else had a thread with BU in the title, I would start a post. I think I have most of my list settled, but there are still a few in the middle and the end that I find myself wavering on. Interested in what non New Yorkers think of Mt. Sinai. For the record, I'm not at all interested in GI, so that wouldn't add much in terms of Mt. Sinai . Interested in strong hands on training, but at the same time would prefer not to be so stressed out that I have no hair at the end of three years.

BU v. Sinai? Sinai, no contest - and this is coming from a non-New Yorker. While BU's fellowship match list is impressive, and the training at Boston City Hospital (er, the Menino Pavilion) cannot be denied, Mt. Sinai's program structure, leadership, location and "feel" are all vastly superior to BU. While I generally prefer Boston > NY, Sinai si just a better program. Clincial training at both is excellent (especially given that both cycle through academic, city and VA hospitals), but Sinai will open more doors for you later in life - and you'll have an easier time of doing it than at BU, where most of the stars matching at MGH/Cleveland Clinic cards are chiefs or MD/PhDs who found the right bench researchers fast.

just my two cents.
 
:soexcited:

Trust your gut - Dr. Call + the new critical care hospital + an amazing pulm/cc division + a solid MPH + some of the nicest people I've ever known in my life = a decision that you will not regret. 🙂love: VCU...)

Rest of the list looks good...although MetroHealth is a little low...

I want to do Pulm/CC and want great clinical
training. Geography is not that important. I will try to finish my MPH during residency. Some of you have helped me before and I really appreciate it, but since then I have gone on second looks and this has changed my ROL. So I would appreciate any insight you could give me.

Tentative ROL:

VCU
Louisville
Iowa
Scott & White-Texas A&M
Minnesota
OU-OKC
UT-San Antonio
MetroHealth

On a side note am I putting too much stock in gut feeling? I ask this because my ROL changed a lot after going on second looks.

Thanks in advance.
 
I figured since everyone else had a thread with BU in the title, I would start a post. I think I have most of my list settled, but there are still a few in the middle and the end that I find myself wavering on. Interested in what non New Yorkers think of Mt. Sinai. For the record, I'm not at all interested in GI, so that wouldn't add much in terms of Mt. Sinai . Interested in strong hands on training, but at the same time would prefer not to be so stressed out that I have no hair at the end of three years.

I have little/no desire to be in NYC for residency but I interviewed at both BU and Sinai. Sinai almost made me reconsider that previous statement- I had a really good time there, Dr. Babyatsky is just a phenomenal person. Also, I'm a big fan of EBM-centric programs and Sinai is as strong as it comes in that regards. You'll work hard at both BU and Sinai but I think you'll have a bit more free time at Sinai- from talking to the residents at BU, it seems that they work a ton. Also, the residents plainly said you have to go out of your way to get good research at BU.

I think its Sinai, hands down given your preferences.
 
I have little/no desire to be in NYC for residency but I interviewed at both BU and Sinai. Sinai almost made me reconsider that previous statement- I had a really good time there, Dr. Babyatsky is just a phenomenal person. Also, I'm a big fan of EBM-centric programs and Sinai is as strong as it comes in that regards. You'll work hard at both BU and Sinai but I think you'll have a bit more free time at Sinai- from talking to the residents at BU, it seems that they work a ton. Also, the residents plainly said you have to go out of your way to get good research at BU.

I think its Sinai, hands down given your preferences.

It's funny, everyone loves the resident report, yet that was one of my turnoffs...I found the program leadership there kind of smug and annoying, and not so much a good personality jive with me...And it is not that I crack under the pressure and don't like being pimped in that way...I actually enjoy that part, I just don't enjoy that kind of smugness from the people doing it.
 
It's funny, everyone loves the resident report, yet that was one of my turnoffs...I found the program leadership there kind of smug and annoying, and not so much a good personality jive with me...And it is not that I crack under the pressure and don't like being pimped in that way...I actually enjoy that part, I just don't enjoy that kind of smugness from the people doing it.

Don't rank a program higher just because it's better. Not every program fits well with everyone's personality, and if you didn't like it when you were there, you shouldn't feel obligated to rank it higher than BU just because it's a better program. The resident report there definitely seemed more stressful than others, although it has a reputation of preparing residents more than the way most other programs run theirs.
 
Trying to finalize my list and am having trouble with the following three places. Planning on going for a cards fellowship. I'm leaning towards UW at number 1, but wanted to see what you guys think.

In no particular order:

1)brown
2)UW
3)U. Colorado

location not really an issue, although the rainy winters in seattle are kind of a downside...
 
Trying to finalize my list and am having trouble with the following three places. Planning on going for a cards fellowship. I'm leaning towards UW at number 1, but wanted to see what you guys think.

In no particular order:

1)brown
2)UW
3)U. Colorado

location not really an issue, although the rainy winters in seattle are kind of a downside...

UW >> Brown, Colorado.
 
UW>>Colorado>Brown

Is this the kind of info people are really seeking? Seems pretty useless to me, I mean anyone from hSDN could could put that together.

Surfdoc-I don't think we met but we definitely covered a lot of the same ground. Here are my thoughts (anyone please feel free to tell me if you think they are worthless I can take it)

UW-Awesome city, lived there for a while. Rain in city=snow in mountains. Go east through the mts. and the other side is a desert. Seriously, I think Seattle is quite easily the greatest city in the U.S., there is more to do within a days drive than anywhere else in the U.S.. You can go surfing, climbing, whitewater rafting, SCUBA diving, sailing, fishing, hiking all on a day's afternoon. I know the program has a big reputation and since I love Seattle so much I went there expecting to be wowed. I wasn't, I was really underwhelmed. I like the PD and what he was looking to do but I felt like his vision was just that a vision of what the place could be not what the place was. Certainly people get good fellowships from here but I was really surprised at the lack of discourse during morning report, they just kinda run through the admit from overnight and don't really analyze/discuss one single case. Also there was no hesitation from the residents admitting that the primary care side of the program was in name only.

OHSU-I saw it from your list earlier but noticed it wasn't in your top 3, kinda surprised, I'll give it a little love. I went to OHSU right after UW and was way more impressed. I am not on the W. Coast so I don't have the immediate bias of which name gets people off easier but I felt like the program was higher quality and that you would definitely get better teaching there. Portland is a great city from what I hear. I've had a lot of friends from Seattle move down there and say Portland even better than Seattle so that is a huge endorsement. The PD seems like a really great guy and is very dedicated and active in the world of IM resident education. Seems interested in being ahead of the curve in terms of curricular development rather than playing catchup.

Colorado-Very much liked the residents, it may have had a lot to do with the fact that on the preinterview dinner I played pool and drank beer and didn't have any painful conversations. The program seemed very strong and the residents very laid back but intellectually engaged. I had heard there were some issues with regards to the new hospitals in particular the ER and increased medicine admissions without any increase in the size of the non-teaching service. essentially all those admissions just got pilled onto the medicine teaching service, i.e. the residents. In asking about this it sounds like that has finally been brought under control. This isn't unusual and definitley occurs anytime someone opens or expands new ERs. Otherwise I don't really know enough about the program to feel too comfortable making any judgements.

Brown-One of the biggest RI fans around. Surfing can be very good sporadically and usually during the fall with hurricane season. Brown is essentially the only show in town for a very diverse and huge patient population. Went to med school here and really like the program. The PDs are some of the greatest people I've met in medicine and are super supportive. People seem to do well for the fellowships they want but the place isn't packed with the kind of obsessive annoying types that fill the SDN pages.

That's probably more than you wanted and I can't bring myself to actually rank them for you which may have been all you wanted anyway...
 
Thanks for a most informative post. As far as...

Is this the kind of info people are really seeking? Seems pretty useless to me, I mean anyone from hSDN could could put that together.

I think some people find it useful. I know you take pride in the fact that you concern yourself more with where you can get the best billiards game or go white river rafting than prestige and fellowship placement, but not everyone feels the same way. I personally feel that residency classes have different personalities from year to year. What is important is that you are actually working under 80 hours and that those 80 hours aren't such backbreakers that you have no energy to do anything else in life. Also, the support of program leadership can make life more pleasant. Personally, I will probably spend a fair amount of my free time sleeping, watching tv, playing video games, reading and shooting hoops...I'm unabashedly a dork....feel free to think less of me as a result, but I'm not such a minority in medicine.
 
I am from california, want to eventually end up there for fellowship, but don't really care where I am for residency - would just like to go to the best place possible which will give me plenty of options after (I'm not really interested in cards or GI for fellowship, maybe Hem/Onc or Rheum, and I'd like to end up at a place like Stanford/UCSF/UCLA)

In no particular order:

BIDMC
Michigan
Harbor UCLA
Cedars Sinai
UCSD
USC
 
I'm interested in Heme/Onc. My tentative rank list is as follows (location not a concern). What do you think?

1. UMDNJ New Brunswick
2. UMDNJ Newark
3. U of Arizona
4. GW
5. SUNY Stony Brook
6. St Louis
7. Washington Hospital Center
 
I am from california, want to eventually end up there for fellowship, but don't really care where I am for residency - would just like to go to the best place possible which will give me plenty of options after (I'm not really interested in cards or GI for fellowship, maybe Hem/Onc or Rheum, and I'd like to end up at a place like Stanford/UCSF/UCLA)

In no particular order:

BIDMC
Michigan
Harbor UCLA
Cedars Sinai
UCSD
USC

BIDMC and Michigan are the best im programs on your list by far, but a lot of times fellowship are geographically driven...And this may be even more true in less competitive fellowships where perhaps programs wouldn't be as interested in interviewing a large national pool...I think the Cali programs you mention should be ranked 1. UCSD>> 2. Harbor=Cedars Sinai 4. USC. But I would still rank the UM and BIDMC higher than any of those. I just don't get the sense that UCSD is quite at the same level as a UM or BIDMC, even though they have a top 20 ranked medical school and enormous research opportunities at said medical school.
 
I'm interested in Heme/Onc. My tentative rank list is as follows (location not a concern). What do you think?

1. UMDNJ New Brunswick
2. UMDNJ Newark
3. U of Arizona
4. GW
5. SUNY Stony Brook
6. St Louis
7. Washington Hospital Center

I don't know too much about most of these program, but I would consider moving Stony Brook even lower on your list. Not a big fan of the facillities nor location, and they do seem to have a very high percentage of IMGs. (Although you yourself might be an img, and I don't mean it as a dig.)
 
I'm thinking Hem/Onc or Critical Care...not completely decided though.

Here's my list, I'dwelcome ANY tips/advice!

1. WashU
2. U-Illinois Chicago
3. U of Minnesota
4. Georgetown
5. Rush
6. U of Michigan
7. U of Nebraska
8. Tulane
9. U of Wisconsin
 
I'm thinking Hem/Onc or Critical Care...not completely decided though.

Here's my list, I'dwelcome ANY tips/advice!

1. WashU
2. U-Illinois Chicago
3. U of Minnesota
4. Georgetown
5. Rush
6. U of Michigan
7. U of Nebraska
8. Tulane
9. U of Wisconsin

Why are you ranking Michigan so low? I would put WashU and Michigan #1 and #2 (or #2 and #1). I would also put Wisconsin above Rush and Nebraska.
 
Why are you ranking Michigan so low? I would put WashU and Michigan #1 and #2 (or #2 and #1). I would also put Wisconsin above Rush and Nebraska.

👍

Also Tulane is unexpectedly low. I think the OP's list has something to do with geographical consideration - and living in Chicago (though that still doesnt explain Nebraska).
 
👍

Also Tulane is unexpectedly low. I think the OP's list has something to do with geographical consideration - and living in Chicago (though that still doesnt explain Nebraska).


Basically, I have the programs grouped into top, middle, bottom, haven't quite sorted out where to put them:

Top: UIC, WashU, U of M
Middle: Michigan, Georgetown, Rush
Bottom: U Wisc, Tulane, U Nebraska

You're right-there's quite a bit of geographical consideration. I'd prefer a big city over a college town. I'm single, and spent the last 4 years with a class full of marrieds...love my friends, but ready for a change. Didn't get great feel for Ann Arbor-weather was terrible (rain/snow mix, nasty) so that may have soured my feelings on the city. Anyone have strong feelings about ann arbor? or live there?
 
Didn't get great feel for Ann Arbor-weather was terrible (rain/snow mix, nasty) so that may have soured my feelings on the city. Anyone have strong feelings about ann arbor? or live there?


I went to U of M for undergrad-- the weather in Ann Arbor is not that bad. It's pretty similar to Chicago, and probably equal to or slightly better than U of Wisc. Ann Arbor is a great place, but with so many young 18-22 people in the undergrad program, it may be hard to meet people if you're single. That being said, lots of grad programs with 20-30 somethings to meet.

Do you think U Wisc has mostly married residents?
 
Basically, I have the programs grouped into top, middle, bottom, haven't quite sorted out where to put them:

Top: UIC, WashU, U of M
Middle: Michigan, Georgetown, Rush
Bottom: U Wisc, Tulane, U Nebraska

You're right-there's quite a bit of geographical consideration. I'd prefer a big city over a college town. I'm single, and spent the last 4 years with a class full of marrieds...love my friends, but ready for a change. Didn't get great feel for Ann Arbor-weather was terrible (rain/snow mix, nasty) so that may have soured my feelings on the city. Anyone have strong feelings about ann arbor? or live there?


Oh, also... I would put Rush over UIC, and Michigan over U of Minn.
 
Basically, I have the programs grouped into top, middle, bottom, haven't quite sorted out where to put them:

Top: UIC, WashU, U of M
Middle: Michigan, Georgetown, Rush
Bottom: U Wisc, Tulane, U Nebraska

You're right-there's quite a bit of geographical consideration. I'd prefer a big city over a college town. I'm single, and spent the last 4 years with a class full of marrieds...love my friends, but ready for a change. Didn't get great feel for Ann Arbor-weather was terrible (rain/snow mix, nasty) so that may have soured my feelings on the city. Anyone have strong feelings about ann arbor? or live there?

Makes sense. Location is uber important to me as well and while I thought Ann Arbor was ok, it would be difficult for me to spend three years there. Having said that, I agree with your "tiers." You'll be fine at any your top choices.
 
Interested in GI...

(In no specific order):

Pittsburgh
Brown
U of Rochester
Dartmouth
Rush
UIC
Loyola
UAB
 
Top