- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
- Messages
- 4,407
- Reaction score
- 2,370
The only person yesterday night who tried to pry our "positions" in this game was you - not me.
Can you clarify how exactly SOV was trying to "pry" information? Or are you saying that just because he's the one who started the conversation thread?
In fact, it seems too obvious period. Chilbo announces to group he's a Cat-Man, or whatever, not even saying what he could do (I'm assuming) and ends up dead? I would never, as a wolf, kill off the first person in my group that role-revealed to everyone. That'd be stupid as hell and would make it very obvious that there was a wolf in the group. So unless we have a trigger-happy noob wolf calling the shots for all of them, I'm starting to rethink the idea what we have a wolf in that group anyway.
Maybe the wolves are intentionally raising suspicions on the group to avoid suspicion (confusing I know but lemme explain).
This is a little crazy but maybe the wolves were expecting a reverse psychological take of the events? Everyone seems to agree that killing off an immediate role-reveal is a stupid move and that no good wolf would do it, but maybe that's why they did it? Cuz then they can try and place blame on someone else within the group and kill 2 birds with one stone? That being said, I'm skeptical of all of the people in the group, especially those who are trying to sway votes.
***lynch Dom*** as they've been the most vocal about who everyone should lynch and trying to influence everyone.
Maybe the wolves are intentionally raising suspicions on the group to avoid suspicion (confusing I know but lemme explain).
This is a little crazy but maybe the wolves were expecting a reverse psychological take of the events? Everyone seems to agree that killing off an immediate role-reveal is a stupid move and that no good wolf would do it, but maybe that's why they did it? Cuz then they can try and place blame on someone else within the group and kill 2 birds with one stone? That being said, I'm skeptical of all of the people in the group, especially those who are trying to sway votes.
***lynch Dom*** as they've been the most vocal about who everyone should lynch and trying to influence everyone.
Maybe the wolves are intentionally raising suspicions on the group to avoid suspicion (confusing I know but lemme explain).
This is a little crazy but maybe the wolves were expecting a reverse psychological take of the events? Everyone seems to agree that killing off an immediate role-reveal is a stupid move and that no good wolf would do it, but maybe that's why they did it? Cuz then they can try and place blame on someone else within the group and kill 2 birds with one stone? That being said, I'm skeptical of all of the people in the group, especially those who are trying to sway votes.
Checking in..
I am sticking with Dom vote. Don't know this person at all, but the defensive response is all out of proportion. Typical wolf.
I am not a dumb wolf. I am not a wolf. Anyone who actually has paid attention would know that.
Later.
Domenic...you are really off the rails...
First off, I didn't mention my role, I talked about something in my role description. I, unlike you, am not in my first rodeo. I was trying to see if anyone knew what the doctor stepping into people's minds meant. Not that I am the doctor. Absolutely not. Would never reveal such an important role when I have one. I are Wolff base.
Secondly I didn't ask for anyone's role. Not fishing...just getting the ball started in our group which tons of people do.. I do this sometimes, not always.
Third, I revealed that I was a villager but that my role description doesn't say "ou are a villager" like many do as a way for others to trust me. A wolf wouldn't know that roles don't have that kind of info.
Finally, you are taking this way too personal. I didn't say you did anything...I said it was possible someone in our group did it. I selected you because you are a noob and most likely t make a mistake....but unlike you,I have no certainty of it. How you can be so wrongly convinced I am a wolf just shows either your noobiness or your wolfiness.
And just because I have a life doesn't mean I am purposely ignoring you to get u lynched.d. The world doesn't revolve around you.
************************
Kind of wish I were playing so I could say words and really glad I am not at the same time....
I will just keep doing this:
************************
Clearly, my loud & abrasive posting style that the loungers have come to known and love has cost me this one.
I just got a break from work...my Dad is here today and he's been on my case so havent had a chance to catch up on this thread. Dom is a new player so not sure if his posts are coz he's a newbie or a bad guy.
I'm confused.
So which is it: Is Domenic an experienced lounge player that loungers have "come to know and love" or is he a "new player"?
Now I'm starting to think I should have voted to lynch Dom.
It would be quite unlike SOV to drop a role to someone unless he was a seer or had an item, and had cleared them first. And obviously he hasn't cleared you, or else he'd wouldn't be voting for you. So something seems odd with this whole thing.
Does anyone want to look into the hint chilbo just dropped?
Nonsense. If there is one thing you can count on from SOV, it's that he'll lie, twist, and fabricate something about his role. And how many times has he pulled some game-opening role-claim to try and accomplish one thing or another?
The only problem is that he does it as a wolf AND as a villager. So it's not a great test.
Unless I'm missing something, Chillbo shouldn't be dropping hints if they're dead...
Unless I'm missing something, Chillbo shouldn't be dropping hints if they're dead...
I should have clarified - if he was a villager, I doubt he would role-drop N1.
I should have clarified - if he was a villager, I doubt he would role-drop N1. I could be wrong, but that's what I gathered the couple times I've played in close communication with him.
If he was a wolf, I would totally believe he'd do it with an alias to throw people off the scent immediately.
But this doesn't sound like he actually named someone, just asked vague questions, which could put him in either camp.
He named the Doctor WTF.
I quoted him.
"Doctor stepping into people's minds.
... It sounds wolfish, but I thought the Doctor would be a good guy, no?
So...you're saying SOV would directly implicate himself, if he claimed this role, as wolfish to the group?That doesn't make any sense.
so it looks like the wolves may be weeping angels. @$#%
I know I'm right. Don't blink is weeping angels all the way. I just freaking hate weeping angels.Damn you're right me thinks. After i'm lynched I'll state why.