I'm trying to sort out my list and was hoping for some advice. I liked all these programs and would be happy at any of them, so factors such as location and cost of living are pretty important. The one caveat is if there are significantly greater academic opportunities that will come from the tippity-top, then I would brave the cold or be poor for a few years. I don't know what I want to subspecialize in yet but I'm not too worried about fellowship placement, more so thinking broadly about a future career in academia. So my question is - how big are the differences between these programs from a future opportunities/reputation perspective? Thanks in advance.
Today's version of the ROL:
Brigham
Duke
Vanderbilt
Hopkins
Wash U
Mayo
UCSF
I interviewed at all of those programs and if I had to separate into tiers
1) BWH, Hopkins, UCSF
2) Duke, Mayo
3) Vandy, Wash U
Cost of living: I think Durham, Rochester, Nashville, St louis are the most affordable.
Match list: Again, BWH, Hopkins, UCSF are a cut above the rest.
Academic Opps: Depends what you're talking about? Basic science research, clinical research, global health stuff?? I'll just list out which programs (by my impression) were good at this in no particular order.
- Basic Science: Hopkins, UCSF, Wash U
- Clinical: BWH, Mayo, Hopkins, UCSF, Duke
- Global health: BWH, Hopkins, Duke
Honestly, I think you'll do very well in academia at any of these places. All are fantastic. I do think BWH, Hopkins and UCSF incite a little more "wow" factor if that's important to you... considering they probably are the hardest places to land an interview/match for residency