- Joined
- Dec 6, 2012
- Messages
- 92
- Reaction score
- 0
Ithink people are more worried about the "baking powder and vinegar" method, not the cervical dislocation
ewww
Ithink people are more worried about the "baking powder and vinegar" method, not the cervical dislocation
Ithink people are more worried about the "baking powder and vinegar" method, not the cervical dislocation
Cervical dislocation is humane when done correctly, which I'm sure it was or else they probably wouldn't have tried it. I've seen it done numerous times, the rodents are passed in a few seconds without any struggling at all.
I understand that putting your own pet down may be a tough issue, but cervical dislocation or not, you're going to think about it the rest of your life. I think it takes more guts than I have to put down my own pet, I think it's admirable to know when to take action and do it yourself.
I've been in the field for 11 years. I would never even think to do this. I don't think it has anything to do with having the guts.
Frankly I find it appalling.
I didn't mean to do anything inhumane or hurt the rat. I love rats...I honestly wanted to vomit just thinking about it. But watching her writhe around on the pavers with blood in her mouth wasn't fun either. There was no struggle and I let her calm down in my hands first so her last moments weren't spent in complete horror. She passed extremely quickly and lost her blink reflex almost immediately. Much better then flopping on the pavement to die slowly in the cold. I'm sorry I stirred things up, I had a situation that I really had no idea how to deal with. Putting her in a box and driving 30 mins to an emergency clinic would have been worse, imho. I'm just glad its over, and glad she isn't suffering.
Once again, sorry for stirring things up, I did not intend for it to. Peace, please. It is done and over with, it happened, I'm not proud, but it had to be done one way or another for the rats sake. Sorry.
I didn't mean to do anything inhumane or hurt the rat. I love rats...I honestly wanted to vomit just thinking about it. But watching her writhe around on the pavers with blood in her mouth wasn't fun either.
Once again, sorry for stirring things up, I did not intend for it to. Peace, please. It is done and over with, it happened, I'm not proud, but it had to be done one way or another for the rats sake. Sorry.
I think you did the right thing too. I have had situations on my property where wild animals (ie, baby birds falling from nests onto pavement) have been hurt and I know they will die. I always wish I had the skill to do what you did and save them hours/days of suffering until they pass on their own. I agree with kcoughli on "humane" encompassing sparing suffering, so kudos to you for being brave.
My gerbil euths came to $46 at an emergency clinic. That vet clinic sounds a little psycho for wanting $100 for a euth.
The ER/CC/Specialty clinic I work at provides euths with no exam/consult, with a brief consult and a full consult if you're wanting to see what options there are before putting your pet down. I can understand why they would require an exam for primary care services, but euths? Seems a bit much. I understand why you chose that route and sympathize as it must have been a difficult decision. 🙁
We require what we call a quality of life exam (at a very discounted rate) if we have never seen the animal or if we have not seen the animal in a long time. Because the Dr. will not compromise her morals to euth a healthy pet. We have A LOT of people trying to euth an animal because they are inconvenient and the shelter is full.
So if the quality of life exam finds the animal to be in good condition or have a manageable problem, do you turn them away? I'm not interested in sparking a convenience euth debate because we all know the sides of that. Just wondering since I'm pretty sure that if the client wants a convenience euth at our clinic, the vet will try to talk them out of it but will ultimately fulfill the client's request.
Yeah, we'll turn them away. If another office wants to do it, they can. But my Dr. has decided she doesn't want... the marks on her karma? How do I say that? lol You understand what I'm saying.
Yeah, we'll turn them away. If another office wants to do it, they can. But my Dr. has decided she doesn't want... the marks on her karma? How do I say that? lol You understand what I'm saying.
Is it a privately-owned practice? How many docs? It would be interesting to see if there was a trend in relation to private vs. corporate. Obviously with a private practice, you can decide what you want when you're the owner or if it is agreed upon among everyone. Corporate is policy, period. Just wondering out loud. 🙂
This is that same that it was at the clinics that I worked at. Ultimately, it was up to the doctor if they wanted to do the "convenience euth" and most of the doctors that I worked with did not want to have to go home at night and try living with themselves having euth'd healthy animals for no real reason. I have to applaud anyone that gets into shelter med as a vet, as I am sure that is a really tough thing to deal with.
Ok. This is going to sound harsh. Having a pet is a privilege not a right. If you don't have the money for one, then maybe you shouldn't have one. And even that statement sounds a bit more rigid that I intend for it to. I understand you can't prepare for everything, but this is unacceptable to me. I think that doing a home euth is reckless and irresponsible. You are not trained to be doing this, you are not in a controlled environment, and in the event you do it wrong, because that is certainly possible because you are NOT a trained professional, you do not have the skills, knowledge or tools necessary to minimize the suffering of that animal. IMO, it's selfish. It's money. You need money to have pets. I have coughed up thousands for my dog in an emergency situation, having to repay some of it, because as her owner, it is my job to do what is best for her, regardless. I payed $175 to euth my ferret because that is my job. This is something I feel very strongly about.
I agree with this. If my dogs had gotten the rat in the day time I would have drove it to the nerest open clinic and beg they do it for me. Sadly, it was late at night and the closest emerg clinic to me is a 25-30 min drive and I didn't want to drag it out that long. I would've rather had a professional eu the wild rat but...well I didn't really have that option.
And I remember in private practice a woman wanted our dr to eu her 2 pugs because she couldn't bear the thought of them going to a home other than hers and she had to get rid of them. I worked in a corp office and I remember my vet crying because she didn't want to. We ended up talking the woman out of it but I feel like its wrong to force vets to do things like that. She was tore up.
In shelter medicine, at least at my shelter, its mostly technicians and other trained individuals who do eus. The vet must sign off on it but usually they do not have to see the pet first. It really sucks when we have a very nice animal with an unfixable health problem. Blah.
You are probably all aware of the other side of the debate: every time you turn down a euth for a healthy pet, what is the owner going to do to that animal? Find it a home? Dump it? Perform euthanasia himself? I would feel better putting a healthy animal down than knowing it could end up in a situation that is worse than death. That was one of the reasons brought up when the "no questions asked" policy came up. If rehoming a healthy animal was that easy, there would not be a hundred "Free Cat" ads in the classifieds.
Yeah. I didn't say the solution was perfect. It just... is a crappy situation. But I could not live with myself euthanizing animals that are healthy. Where I work we put them in touch with various rescues and have even taken animals in and found homes for them ourselves.
That is how the very small shelter got started in the small town where I attended undergrad. The vet there had a few people bring in dogs and cats they couldn't keep for whatever reason, so he just decided to hold onto them and try to find homes for them. It got to the point where the spare room he had in the back of his clinic became the town animal shelter. Eventually he enlisted the college to help and got so much support there was a waitlist if you wanted to volunteer there!
You are probably all aware of the other side of the debate: every time you turn down a euth for a healthy pet, what is the owner going to do to that animal? Find it a home? Dump it? Perform euthanasia himself? I would feel better putting a healthy animal down than knowing it could end up in a situation that is worse than death. That was one of the reasons brought up when the "no questions asked" policy came up. If rehoming a healthy animal was that easy, there would not be a hundred "Free Cat" ads in the classifieds.
Ok. This is going to sound harsh. Having a pet is a privilege not a right. If you don't have the money for one, then maybe you shouldn't have one. And even that statement sounds a bit more rigid that I intend for it to. I understand you can't prepare for everything, but this is unacceptable to me. I think that doing a home euth is reckless and irresponsible. You are not trained to be doing this, you are not in a controlled environment, and in the event you do it wrong, because that is certainly possible because you are NOT a trained professional, you do not have the skills, knowledge or tools necessary to minimize the suffering of that animal. IMO, it's selfish. It's money. You need money to have pets. I have coughed up thousands for my dog in an emergency situation, having to repay some of it, because as her owner, it is my job to do what is best for her, regardless. I payed $175 to euth my ferret because that is my job. This is something I feel very strongly about.
Here's the deal, CO2 asphyxiation, if done slowly and in a controlled method, makes the animal fall asleep, then eventually succumb. It is the preferred method of euth for lab rodents for this reason. Cervical dislocation is generally the back up to this method , just to make sure they are truly gone and don't later wake up and freeze to death (since many are subsequently frozen, also younger rodents tend to be difficult to asphyxiate).
The labs I've worked in and the training courses I've attended have discouraged CO2 asphyxiation for euthanasia because there have been reports of the rats experiencing hypoxia and distress before becoming unconscious. At the university I worked at the only methods for euthanasia in rodents that were approved were cervical dislocation, barbiturate overdose, decapitation or intracardiac blood draw (followed by overdose to ensure death). The animal had to be completely anesthetized prior to administering whatever method of euthanasia. CO2 asphyxiation is an accepted method; I just wanted to point out that it is not the preferred method everywhere and some universities no longer approve of its use.
Coming out of SDN self-banishment for this topic, because I find it odd. What do you mean by a trained professional and are you including all animals? It does not take a vet to put an animal out of its misery correctly and painlessly. Now...I wouldn't suggest learning how to do it on YouTube.... 🙁
I guess I'm just not sure I understand what is selfish about this situation. I think I must be missing the person or post you are targeting.
I mean they are not a veterinarian. And I read it and had the reaction that, if you don't want to pay money for an animal, including euthanasias, then don't have one. Don't try to pinch pennies and possibly make your animal suffer needlessly.
Is it a privately-owned practice? How many docs? It would be interesting to see if there was a trend in relation to private vs. corporate. Obviously with a private practice, you can decide what you want when you're the owner or if it is agreed upon among everyone. Corporate is policy, period. Just wondering out loud. 🙂
I work in corporate med and we don't do convenience euthanasia. I will turn the client away and suggest relinquishment to a shelter or finding a friend/relative.
I mean they are not a veterinarian. And I read it and had the reaction that, if you don't want to pay money for an animal, including euthanasias, then don't have one. Don't try to pinch pennies and possibly make your animal suffer needlessly.
I just stress ate like a mother fecker. I miss my fiancé like whoa, and having no idea how many months it will be until I see him sucks. Back to my Cheetos and smoothie. *sigh*
I just tried to suck a Cheeto like it was the straw to my smoothie.![]()
Sorry about the other stuff, but this made me laugh. Totally something I would do and then hope no one saw...I just stress ate like a mother fecker. I miss my fiancé like whoa, and having no idea how many months it will be until I see him sucks. Back to my Cheetos and smoothie. *sigh*
I just tried to suck a Cheeto like it was the straw to my smoothie.![]()
I wouldn't mind this post if it weren't for the number of cases we see with bullets in the frontal sinuses of horses/dogs. I agree that if you are going to do it you should learn from someone experienced but I don't think every individual is going to seek that advice. Not when they've seen dozens of movies where an animal owner shoots the animal 'between the eyes'. Which is not effective in many, many cases.We'll have to agree to disagree on this. Death by bullet is a very acceptable way to put down a horse; while it can be quite traumatic to the human, it's painless and instantaneous for the horse and does not take someone with a degree to do it (though it is something you have to learn to do correct by someone with experience.) It's something I want in my toolbox just in case a vet can't get to my farm when an animal is suffering. It doesn't bother me when people choose to put their animals down this way, whether the reason is based on money or not (and in my experience it is frequently not money or vet availability that makes this choice...it's personal).
I don't know that the same sort of option exists for small animal owners and won't pretend to guess. And I realize that your biggest issue is with the person that listed a dollar amount as a deciding factor, and it was a small dollar amount when we're talking about putting animal out of its misery. Of course...this is coming from a horse person. A $100 is a drop in the bucket for vet visits.![]()
I do agree with you that owning animals is a privilege and that they deserve to be given everything they need for an excellent life. Not going to argue with that. 🙂
Sorry about the other stuff, but this made me laugh. Totally something I would do and then hope no one saw...
I wouldn't mind this post if it weren't for the number of cases we see with bullets in the frontal sinuses of horses/dogs. I agree that if you are going to do it you should learn from someone experienced but I don't think every individual is going to seek that advice. Not when they've seen dozens of movies where an animal owner shoots the animal 'between the eyes'. Which is not effective in many, many cases.
I think that's why so many vets firmly believe a veterinarian should do the euthanasia. Because we go to school for this. And we aren't going to captive bolt a pig between the eyes.
I just stress ate like a mother fecker. I miss my fiancé like whoa, and having no idea how many months it will be until I see him sucks. Back to my Cheetos and smoothie. *sigh*
I just tried to suck a Cheeto like it was the straw to my smoothie.![]()
Didn't the person say they've done many euthanasias on rats before? So it wasn't complete inexperience at least..
I thought I had read that too, which is why I didn't freak out about it. It sounded like they had been trained from a previous job, but maybe I am mixing up people.
However, I agree, that I don't think it's cool that the receptionist gave out info on how to do it and that your average person shouldn't be doing them.
I agree. With both things. Since there was experience, I wasn't as worried. But the info shouldn't have been given out that way since the receptionist wouldn't know the person's experience level. And I doubt they would have said it about a dog, so they shouldn't have for a rat either.
Yeah, we'll turn them away. If another office wants to do it, they can. But my Dr. has decided she doesn't want... the marks on her karma? How do I say that? lol You understand what I'm saying.
Yeah. I didn't say the solution was perfect. It just... is a crappy situation. But I could not live with myself euthanizing animals that are healthy. Where I work we put them in touch with various rescues and have even taken animals in and found homes for them ourselves.
AGREED...we do the same.
As for the previous topic....my issue is not with what Mommafox said or had to do (so much). The person who replied regarding her personal "pets" is what I find upsetting.