Scientifically Silly WW Game Thread

Started by WildZoo
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
What do you think of dolphin's comment re. Skimble.
She pointed out that Skimble's vote for me was when there was no additional info to go off of (per Skimble), and later in the day after many conversations occurred, she was posting but did not contribute to conversation or change her vote?

Why would Skim have to had changed her vote? And why are you asking my opinion rather than stating your own?

why should I?

Because you supposedly have a list that has a 33% chance of hitting a wolf and I'd think you'd start there.
 
Why would Skim have to had changed her vote? And why are you asking my opinion rather than stating your own?



Because you supposedly have a list that has a 33% chance of hitting a wolf and I'd think you'd start there.
Well what's the point for a villager of essentially sitting out D1 on a short-living game (tomorrow=lylo if no wolf lynch)?
I'm not the one voting for dolphin.

I will start there as I believe I'm doing right now. 33% chance of hitting a wolf with only 2 shots left.
 
It was never my intention to shut down discussion, and I think if that was my goal I wouldn't have asked anyone any questions today, or attempted to prompt discussion. I agree with you about Skim, especially now that the majority of players have been on and posting, and there is likely some more solid reasons to throw a vote on someone than what boils down to "they took my number and could be a wolf". Pippy seems village but she very much fooled me last game.
actually it was BJ, not dolphin
 
Well what's the point for a villager of essentially sitting out D1 on a short-living game (tomorrow=lylo if no wolf lynch)?
I'm not the one voting for dolphin.

I will start there as I believe I'm doing right now. 33% chance of hitting a wolf with only 2 shots left.

What does the bolded mean? How are you doing it right now if you're not voting?
 
Well at the moment I'm not because you side-stepped my initial question.

How was Skimble wolf hunting yesterday? What did she say that indicated to you she legitimately thought she would be catching a wolf?

She was voting early and stayed on her vote despite backlash. Those are decent wolf hunting strategies because it allows people to respond and evaluated in a timely manner.

Still don't understand how this relates to your original question.
 
She was voting early and stayed on her vote despite backlash. Those are decent wolf hunting strategies because it allows people to respond and evaluated in a timely manner.

Still don't understand how this relates to your original question.
How is that any different from games where people place an early joke vote and stay on it, which is usually frowned upon and does this excuse her from not participating in active conversation for what may be 1/3 of the game?

And, is that strategy sufficient for you to decide she must be village...?
 
How is that any different from games where people place an early joke vote and stay on it, which is usually frowned upon and does this excuse her from not participating in active conversation for what may be 1/3 of the game?

And, is that strategy sufficient for you to decide she must be village...?

She said it wasn't a joke vote and clearly stated she wouldn't be moving yesterday. And you never put her into your list so you must not have a major problem with it. Day 1 is still Day 1 unless it perpetually lylo or something convoluted like that. Where do you think Skim should have moved to be more productive for the village?
 
She said it wasn't a joke vote and clearly stated she wouldn't be moving yesterday. And you never put her into your list so you must not have a major problem with it. Day 1 is still Day 1 unless it perpetually lylo or something convoluted like that. Where do you think Skim should have moved to be more productive for the village?
1. Stating not a joke vote =/= a serious vote. How COULD it be serious if it was before anyone had posted?
2. Absolutely false. Skimble, SAR, Pip, and you were the four I listed. I didn't join the skim vote because I'm not retaliatory.
3. D1 when it is D1 of 3 is a bigger deal. What'd you think if she acted the same today?
4. I'm not telling anyone where they should move. I'm saying she should've engaged in the conversations that were happening
5. You didn't answer if you believe Skim is village or not
 
She said it wasn't a joke vote and clearly stated she wouldn't be moving yesterday. And you never put her into your list so you must not have a major problem with it. Day 1 is still Day 1 unless it perpetually lylo or something convoluted like that. Where do you think Skim should have moved to be more productive for the village?
And why have you now lied twice about my actions :yeahright:
 
1. Stating not a joke vote =/= a serious vote. How COULD it be serious if it was before anyone had posted?
2. Absolutely false. Skimble, SAR, Pip, and you were the four I listed. I didn't join the skim vote because I'm not retaliatory.
3. D1 when it is D1 of 3 is a bigger deal. What'd you think if she acted the same today?
4. I'm not telling anyone where they should move. I'm saying she should've engaged in the conversations that were happening
5. You didn't answer if you believe Skim is village or not

A. Well, if she says it's not a joke vote, then what else it is but a serious vote?
B. I forgot, but Skim was someone already on the board yesterday versus starting a new wagon on SAR who was voting for Skim. Why are you afraid of being perceived as retaliatory?
C. I'd ask her what her reasoning was for today.
D. Then why were you trying to get people to move yesterday?
E. Why does that matter to you so much?
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
A. Well, if she says it's not a joke vote, then what else it is but a serious vote?
B. I forgot, but Skim was someone already on the board yesterday versus starting a new wagon on SAR who was voting for Skim. Why are you afraid of being perceived as retaliatory?
C. I'd ask her what her reasoning was for today.
D. Then why were you trying to get people to move yesterday?
E. Why does that matter to you so much?
A. A serious vote is not baseless. Ergo, not a serious vote. Skimble said she had nothing to go off of at that point. End of the day, there was more to go off of.
B. PBC voted SAR first and I trusted PBC more than SAR. I don't care if I'm perceived as retaliatory, stating that I'm not, and did not want it to cloud my judgement.
D. To no one in particular. I said I was interested in moving the vote but did not say to whom and did not push it much.
E. Because as one of my wolfy candidates you are defending another of my wolfy candidates and have still not answered the question
 
A. A serious vote is not baseless. Ergo, not a serious vote. Skimble said she had nothing to go off of at that point. End of the day, there was more to go off of.
B. PBC voted SAR first and I trusted PBC more than SAR. I don't care if I'm perceived as retaliatory, stating that I'm not, and did not want it to cloud my judgement.
D. To no one in particular. I said I was interested in moving the vote but did not say to whom and did not push it much.
E. Because as one of my wolfy candidates you are defending another of my wolfy candidates and have still not answered the question

1. She said she wasn't moving though. Wouldn't it have been weird if she moved. I still don't know why you're asking me about this instead of Skim though.
2. If you trusted PBC, you should've moved to a wagon that would've helped save her instead of trying to start a new one.
4. Which is weak.
5. Where am I defending her? You got on me because I voted dolphin. Don't twist this.
 
1. Stating not a joke vote =/= a serious vote. How COULD it be serious if it was before anyone had posted?
2. Absolutely false. Skimble, SAR, Pip, and you were the four I listed. I didn't join the skim vote because I'm not retaliatory.
3. D1 when it is D1 of 3 is a bigger deal. What'd you think if she acted the same today?
4. I'm not telling anyone where they should move. I'm saying she should've engaged in the conversations that were happening
5. You didn't answer if you believe Skim is village or not

A. Well, if she says it's not a joke vote, then what else it is but a serious vote?
B. I forgot, but Skim was someone already on the board yesterday versus starting a new wagon on SAR who was voting for Skim. Why are you afraid of being perceived as retaliatory?
C. I'd ask her what her reasoning was for today.
D. Then why were you trying to get people to move yesterday?
E. Why does that matter to you so much?

A. A serious vote is not baseless. Ergo, not a serious vote. Skimble said she had nothing to go off of at that point. End of the day, there was more to go off of.
B. PBC voted SAR first and I trusted PBC more than SAR. I don't care if I'm perceived as retaliatory, stating that I'm not, and did not want it to cloud my judgement.
D. To no one in particular. I said I was interested in moving the vote but did not say to whom and did not push it much.
E. Because as one of my wolfy candidates you are defending another of my wolfy candidates and have still not answered the question

1. She said she wasn't moving though. Wouldn't it have been weird if she moved. I still don't know why you're asking me about this instead of Skim though.
2. If you trusted PBC, you should've moved to a wagon that would've helped save her instead of trying to start a new one.
4. Which is weak.
5. Where am I defending her? You got on me because I voted dolphin. Don't twist this.
Can't you guys keep your numbering/lettering consistent??? :rage:
 
Day 2 Shouldn't Polar Bears Dissolve in Water Lynch Tally

cheezit (1) - pip
dolphin (1) - AM

2/7 voting
Plurality = 4 votes
Deadline 10pm EST (~10 hours)

Not voting: dolphin, cheez, skil, bj, coffee?
8e3ad582f9583583eede766fe9e19ea8.jpg
 
1. She said she wasn't moving though. Wouldn't it have been weird if she moved. I still don't know why you're asking me about this instead of Skim though.
2. If you trusted PBC, you should've moved to a wagon that would've helped save her instead of trying to start a new one.
4. Which is weak.
5. Where am I defending her? You got on me because I voted dolphin. Don't twist this.
I. She only said she wouldn't move unless she had reason to believe someone was wolf or I was village. But didnt comment on progression of her thoughts during the day to say if or if not either of those things happened.

And I could ask Skim but you are awake 🙂
II. I would've moved to Skim if PBC had moved there. I didn't want to be the onr starting anything because it makes me paranoid.
IV. That wasn't your initial point.
V. Saying her actions are good wolf hunting instead acknowledging my points that they are sketch.
 
Regarding these two response, you just did what you said was weird for me so you're not allowed to call me out for it anymore.
Again, the issue I had with it was not that you could be wrong, because lots of us are for the majority of the game, it was the way you put down a vote for coffee that bothered me. I was wrong yesterday, but I don't think I've ever jump down someone's throat for being wrong before.
 
I. She only said she wouldn't move unless she had reason to believe someone was wolf or I was village. But didnt comment on progression of her thoughts during the day to say if or if not either of those things happened.

And I could ask Skim but you are awake 🙂
II. I would've moved to Skim if PBC had moved there. I didn't want to be the onr starting anything because it makes me paranoid.
IV. That wasn't your initial point.
V. Saying her actions are good wolf hunting instead acknowledging my points that they are sketch.

First, evidently, it did not happen since she said those were the requirements for moving.
Second, you shouldn't be afraid of starting anything if you believe in those reads.
Fourth, what was my intial point then?
Fifth, then why are you seeking my validation? My goal isn't to make you believe she's not sketch. I'm just voting for dolphin.
 
Again, the issue I had with it was not that you could be wrong, because lots of us are for the majority of the game, it was the way you put down a vote for coffee that bothered me. I was wrong yesterday, but I don't think I've ever jump down someone's throat for being wrong before.

How do you feel about my vote now?
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
First, evidently, it did not happen since she said those were the requirements for moving.
Second, you shouldn't be afraid of starting anything if you believe in those reads.
Fourth, what was my intial point then?
Fifth, then why are you seeking my validation? My goal isn't to make you believe she's not sketch. I'm just voting for dolphin.
That would be evident if she was village and otherwise it is null.
And they are not reads per say, they are statistics.
I don't even remember but it wasnt that.
Because I'm evaluating you at the same time and trying to figure out why you're picking dolphin over the other sketchy players