There's a WW in Michigan Game Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Unofficial Day 1 Lynch Tally
kc (2)
- Kara, Cray
DVMD (1) - Sporty
Coop (2) - AM, SoFlo
Kara () -
AM (1) - dy
vmh (1) - Coop
greeney (1) - Fern
Fern (2) - vmh, genny
Pippy (1) - staffy
3m (1) - Snowy
Jil (1) - jboo
Teep (1) - allie
SoFlo (1) - kata
dy (1) - kc
allie (1) - lyra
Cray (1) - LIS
Sporty (1) - 3m
FTB (1) - Pippy

20/28
lynch close in 10.5 hours
 
lol, I thought that was all I had to do, name in bold. Didn't know it needed the word "lynch" in it.

In trying to paraphrase you in listing all the names in the "face off" I added in my comments in /backslash/ as my own joking commentary on it, to explain that I may not be getting all the names involved right, because per your own post there's like 4 people. I should have been clearer that was my own editorializing of the sitch and not yours.

I still find the statement "weird that dy pointed out Pip's subtle backing of staff but not allie's blatant backing of greeny" to be the statement that set me off.

Now that we've raised one another's hackles,

lynch kcough

Because I still find what I feel like is nitpicking this way.... sorta forced and more wolfy than villagery. I could be wrong. I'm willing to back off if anyone in the queersome 4some or anyone commenting on them, starts to seem more off.
1. I know you've played multiple games before this. I had figured it was a typo autocorrect situation but doubling down on "not knowing you needed to put Lynch in there" feels super weird man.
2. Adding comments in (some of which were literally stated outright by other players, but not by me) and again doubling down on it just feels like trying to push on me. Not digging it. If you'd said, "oh on reread I guess that was Lyra who said that blah blah blah" I would've bought it more but this seriously just feels like pushing on nothing.
3. You can take issue with a phrase I say, that's you're prerogative. But what is the issue with it? I was summarizing what I'd read happen in the thread and stating why it lead me to vote where I did. To summarize again, green said something weird, Allie defended them. Then staff said something weird, pippy defended them. Dy picked out pip for defending, but not Allie. That's what I found weird and why I placed my vote there.

I'm tempted to switch to you right now but don't want to get to retaliatory and see bad intentions just because of bias.

Sent from my [device_name] using SDN mobile
 
I was thinking about this “you can PM the person above” thing and realized it is a giant telephone string in each region. ie if player d can talk to player c can talk to player b can talk to player a... but then there might be wolves in those links.
And, in reality it works out as “you can pm above and below” in reality unless it is intended to be one-Way PMs.

This has been “FTB’s deep thoughts” tune in next time for more randomness.


Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
This is reading so very much like "wolf trying to be helpful but not actually contributing anything useful".

Yeah I gotta go here

###unlynch dy###
###Lynch FTB###

Sent from my [device_name] using SDN mobile
 
This is ridiculous, because it's the same crap about me that always comes up early in the game. Plus you guys wolfed with me the first time I ever wolfed, one game ago, so you should have some idea about me.

It would be hilarious if I got a post restriction where I had to like every post, but as you can see, totally unnecessary. I think I actually didn't like a few.

I am fully aware that people find comments about how they will be busy, to be a wolfy excuse to be seen on thread less. You know when I wolfed last time I took great pains to provide all the content expected of me. If I was wolf again, I wouldn't mention the excuse, and I wouldn't lie low, because it's seen as wolfy. It seems to me more likely that a villager would risk looking wolfy to excuse what might look like wolf behavior but is unavoidable IRL stuff, to avoid being lynched, as a way to help village. It seems like all downside for a wolf to draw that kind of attention to gameplay.

Unless you wanna think I would do just that so I could say what I've just said. Before you say I'm using WIFOM circular logic, let me point out that my point is that YOU are using that logic to come to a conclusion about me. You'll have to decide based on meta and whatever else I say if my comment has anything to do with my affiliation or if it's just Cray being Cray. As always, comments about my activity are based on truth and nothing else. Try harder.

LIS, you're hard to read as villager or as a wolf, partly because you pick someone traditionally regarded as "sketch," even when it's their typical behavior, and ride them the whole game. It's a throwaway vote to focus that way. It makes you harder to pick out as a wolf, as happened last game.

Besides that, you add a lot of sharp logic to a WW game. We'll have to see if the balance is more in favor of solid on thread wolf-hunting from you, or typical-LIS-style throwaway votes on the classically sketch, in an attempt to hide your wolfy self. Because if you don't bring your sharp game, the village should consider that they can't afford to take the chance that wolf-you is skating by like that.

I'm glad I said all that before I get wolf-killed N1 like I did last game.


Overreact much?
 
This is ridiculous, because it's the same crap about me that always comes up early in the game. Plus you guys wolfed with me the first time I ever wolfed, one game ago, so you should have some idea about me.

It would be hilarious if I got a post restriction where I had to like every post, but as you can see, totally unnecessary. I think I actually didn't like a few.

I am fully aware that people find comments about how they will be busy, to be a wolfy excuse to be seen on thread less. You know when I wolfed last time I took great pains to provide all the content expected of me. If I was wolf again, I wouldn't mention the excuse, and I wouldn't lie low, because it's seen as wolfy. It seems to me more likely that a villager would risk looking wolfy to excuse what might look like wolf behavior but is unavoidable IRL stuff, to avoid being lynched, as a way to help village. It seems like all downside for a wolf to draw that kind of attention to gameplay.

Unless you wanna think I would do just that so I could say what I've just said. Before you say I'm using WIFOM circular logic, let me point out that my point is that YOU are using that logic to come to a conclusion about me. You'll have to decide based on meta and whatever else I say if my comment has anything to do with my affiliation or if it's just Cray being Cray. As always, comments about my activity are based on truth and nothing else. Try harder.

LIS, you're hard to read as villager or as a wolf, partly because you pick someone traditionally regarded as "sketch," even when it's their typical behavior, and ride them the whole game. It's a throwaway vote to focus that way. It makes you harder to pick out as a wolf, as happened last game.

Besides that, you add a lot of sharp logic to a WW game. We'll have to see if the balance is more in favor of solid on thread wolf-hunting from you, or typical-LIS-style throwaway votes on the classically sketch, in an attempt to hide your wolfy self. Because if you don't bring your sharp game, the village should consider that they can't afford to take the chance that wolf-you is skating by like that.

I'm glad I said all that before I get wolf-killed N1 like I did last game.
I'm not a fan of "if I were a wolf I would/ wouldn't do X" type logic, because as you say it's WIFOM, there's no way to prove you're not doing the opposite of what's expected to throw people off. That said, which game were you a wolf in? I haven't played with you before, so I may take a look at that.
 
I'm not a fan of "if I were a wolf I would/ wouldn't do X" type logic, because as you say it's WIFOM, there's no way to prove you're not doing the opposite of what's expected to throw people off. That said, which game were you a wolf in? I haven't played with you before, so I may take a look at that.

“If I were a wolf....” is pretty much what Crayola offers every single game. Crayola spends 90% of his/her posts talking about Crayola.
 
Never mind. Saw your followup.

In other news, I agree with kcoughli’s ftb point. But I also am comfy with my Crayola vote, especially after the wall of overreaction. I can go either way.
is it wolfy for her? I think I've played exactly 1 game with her
 
is it wolfy for her? I think I've played exactly 1 game with her

The WIFOM? Not at all wolfy for her.

The overreaction? I guess, in all honesty, not much. She tends to get verbosely defensive quickly. But that one felt like a lot even for Crayola.

I dunno. It’s a good point. Maybe I should move my vote. Hmm.

I just keep wishing CrayCray would move from 75% defensive play to 75% offensive play.
 
The WIFOM? Not at all wolfy for her.

The overreaction? I guess, in all honesty, not much. She tends to get verbosely defensive quickly. But that one felt like a lot even for Crayola.

I dunno. It’s a good point. Maybe I should move my vote. Hmm.

I just keep wishing CrayCray would move from 75% defensive play to 75% offensive play.
There are plenty of people that I play with where I don't like their style. If I voted people for that alone...

I still think pippy doesn't look great
 
Never mind. Saw your followup.

In other news, I agree with kcoughli’s ftb point. But I also am comfy with my Crayola vote, especially after the wall of overreaction. I can go either way.
Was feeling the same way but now leaning less towards Cray, cuz she really does these posts every game... Including the last wolf one... So could come back to this tomorrow.

lynch FTB

Allie is still on my sketch list, and has faded off the thread which is also suspicious. Could be swayed that direction.

Edit: typo ftm instead of ftb
 
I really would like to hear more from Allie today to decide if I want to keep my vote there. Also having slight feels for FTB and Crayola, but willing to hold off on Crayola for now if she's always like this.
 
This is reading so very much like "wolf trying to be helpful but not actually contributing anything useful".

Yeah I gotta go here

###unlynch dy###
###Lynch FTB###

Sent from my [device_name] using SDN mobile
Following up on what I just kind of suggested in my response to LIS...I am agreeing with you a lot so far, which makes me a little nervous in conjunction with this post where you kind of just regurgitated my logic for switching to FTB. The last sentence of this also kinda sounds like wolfy KC.

I am interested to see how FTB flips; I may come back to you if she is village.

Right now I have a couple strong village marks for you (e.g. point about Crayola trying to push the "oh but I didn't know you had to put 'lynch' in a vote", because wtf was that about) but also a couple strong wolf marks, so I suppose we shall seeeee
 
Lynch Crayola
Honestly just a matter of getting weird vibes. I don't feel like I have a lot else to go on right now, since I don't know everyone.
 
You would come back on someone for a day 1 vote like that?

Hmm. Starting to be swayed by Dy’s thinking.
I said I may come back to her? But it's not like it was an unreasoned vote, so also yes. I would re-evaluate something like that based off of lynch information. Not sure why that is problematic?
 
Official Good Lord This List is Almost as Long as this Lynch Cycle Day 1 Tally
kc (1) - Cray
DVMD (1) - Sporty
Coop (2) - AM, SoFlo
vmh (1) - Coop
greeney (2) - Fern, Kara
Fern (2) - vmh, genny
Pippy (2) - staffy, dy
3m (1) - Snowy
Jil (1) - jboo
Teep (1) - allie
SoFlo (1) - kata
allie (1) - lyra
Cray (2) - LIS, cowgirl
Sporty (1) - 3m
FTB (3) - Pippy, kc, Paws

22/28
Lynch Close in ~8 hours
 
1. I know you've played multiple games before this. I had figured it was a typo autocorrect situation but doubling down on "not knowing you needed to put Lynch in there" feels super weird man.
2. Adding comments in (some of which were literally stated outright by other players, but not by me) and again doubling down on it just feels like trying to push on me. Not digging it. If you'd said, "oh on reread I guess that was Lyra who said that blah blah blah" I would've bought it more but this seriously just feels like pushing on nothing.
3. You can take issue with a phrase I say, that's you're prerogative. But what is the issue with it? I was summarizing what I'd read happen in the thread and stating why it lead me to vote where I did. To summarize again, green said something weird, Allie defended them. Then staff said something weird, pippy defended them. Dy picked out pip for defending, but not Allie. That's what I found weird and why I placed my vote there.

I'm tempted to switch to you right now but don't want to get to retaliatory and see bad intentions just because of bias.

Sent from my [device_name] using SDN mobile

let me explain

I don't have autocorrect, I type on my desktop computer with a keyboard. I have auto-hey-you-spelled-it-wrong-but-no-help.

I don't know Staff well, maybe Pippy does. But Pippy is usually considered sketch, and her defending an unknown quantity, could be read as sketch, because: based on what about Staff is Pippy coming to this conclusion? Nevermind I did read Staff as noob with the comment as well. It's Pippy's defense of the noob that is sketchy to me. That dy thought so as well, isn't odd to me.

Allie can come off as sketch too, but not so much as Pippy, in my limited meta. Greeny is also a noob, but I have some frame of reference (more than with Staff) to feel that Greeny was being typical. That is the data point I have that makes Allie's defense of Greeny less sketch to me than Pippy's of Staff. I don't see where Pippy's conclusion came from, but I can see where Allie's did.

I'm also biased by Pippy's defense of StayPos' noobiness when we all 3 wolfed together a game ago.

While I find all the fault finding with people's typical play sketch in and of itself, and the attack on noobs for noobiness, I can understand where LIS and dy are coming from in all of this. So given that I don't find dy's conclusion odd, but you do, I therefore find you odd on this one.

How's that for analyzing others???

Still, I'm not trying to push you as wolf and get into any villager on villager action. It's a D1 vote that I was trying to be thoughtful about. Yes, me, thoughtful. Scary thought.
 
Anything specifically causing those vibes?
Its just kind of how everything has been phrased and the big post with a huge line of I'm not a wolf reasoning. Even if that sort of thing is common, it all just seemed a bit much.
 
let me explain

I don't have autocorrect, I type on my desktop computer with a keyboard. I have auto-hey-you-spelled-it-wrong-but-no-help.

I don't know Staff well, maybe Pippy does. But Pippy is usually considered sketch, and her defending an unknown quantity, could be read as sketch, because: based on what about Staff is Pippy coming to this conclusion? Nevermind I did read Staff as noob with the comment as well. It's Pippy's defense of the noob that is sketchy to me. That dy thought so as well, isn't odd to me.

Allie can come off as sketch too, but not so much as Pippy, in my limited meta. Greeny is also a noob, but I have some frame of reference (more than with Staff) to feel that Greeny was being typical. That is the data point I have that makes Allie's defense of Greeny less sketch to me than Pippy's of Staff. I don't see where Pippy's conclusion came from, but I can see where Allie's did.

I'm also biased by Pippy's defense of StayPos' noobiness when we all 3 wolfed together a game ago.

While I find all the fault finding with people's typical play sketch in and of itself, and the attack on noobs for noobiness, I can understand where LIS and dy are coming from in all of this. So given that I don't find dy's conclusion odd, but you do, I therefore find you odd on this one.

How's that for analyzing others???

Still, I'm not trying to push you as wolf and get into any villager on villager action. It's a D1 vote that I was trying to be thoughtful about. Yes, me, thoughtful. Scary thought.
Seriously if you had just explained it like this from the beginning I would have had much less of a problem with it. Explain why you find things sketchy don't just say "that's sketchy" and then put words in people's mouths.

Still not okay with you, but at least you have a reason, whether or not I agree with it.

Sent from my [device_name] using SDN mobile
 
let me explain

I don't have autocorrect, I type on my desktop computer with a keyboard. I have auto-hey-you-spelled-it-wrong-but-no-help.

I don't know Staff well, maybe Pippy does. But Pippy is usually considered sketch, and her defending an unknown quantity, could be read as sketch, because: based on what about Staff is Pippy coming to this conclusion? Nevermind I did read Staff as noob with the comment as well. It's Pippy's defense of the noob that is sketchy to me. That dy thought so as well, isn't odd to me.

Allie can come off as sketch too, but not so much as Pippy, in my limited meta. Greeny is also a noob, but I have some frame of reference (more than with Staff) to feel that Greeny was being typical. That is the data point I have that makes Allie's defense of Greeny less sketch to me than Pippy's of Staff. I don't see where Pippy's conclusion came from, but I can see where Allie's did.

I'm also biased by Pippy's defense of StayPos' noobiness when we all 3 wolfed together a game ago.

While I find all the fault finding with people's typical play sketch in and of itself, and the attack on noobs for noobiness, I can understand where LIS and dy are coming from in all of this. So given that I don't find dy's conclusion odd, but you do, I therefore find you odd on this one.

How's that for analyzing others???

Still, I'm not trying to push you as wolf and get into any villager on villager action. It's a D1 vote that I was trying to be thoughtful about. Yes, me, thoughtful. Scary thought.
Ok but I don't even really know what you're saying here. Based on what I am reading, I think you're saying you find me sketchy, but that typically I am sketchy, so I am actually not sketchy?

Can you clarify, please?
 
Ok but I don't even really know what you're saying here. Based on what I am reading, I think you're saying you find me sketchy, but that typically I am sketchy, so I am actually not sketchy?

Can you clarify, please?
Yeah, as a noob, it's really hard to read all of this because part these claims seem genuine in trying to spot wolves, but a lot of it just seems to be reaching. I feel like someone here might just be causing chaos (which is an ability a role IIRC?).

Also kcough's lynch change onto someone else seemed weird to me after someone put pressure there. Deflecting perhaps?

Going to re-read later tonight and try to make sense of all of this. Going to see TLJ for a second time shortly (it's really freaking good you guys).
 
Hmmm some very early lynch votes. Interesting...

Hahaha love the roasting! Apologies for the ultra-noob behavior 🤣

This one stood out the most for me. "Not standing up for her or anything but..." Psht that is totally standing up for someone. Not saying wolf, but definitely caught my eye.

Then of course we have the pip-staff-dy-mel face off. I do agree with Pip that it read noob to me rather than wolf, however I could see dy's point with the subtle-support being potentially too knowledgeable. However, I also agree with Mel that for dy this seems a lot of talk for Day 1 (but maybe her time in mafia has chaaaanged her? it's also been a bit since I've played with her I think...). All of this wishy-washiness to say I find it weird that dy pointed out Pip's subtle backing of staff but not allie's blatant backing of greeney.

Going to go with my gut on this one and

Lynch dy

Not sold on it, but feeeeeeeeeels

I don't think I've played on SDN for like a year? I can link some MU games if you want

This is pretty close to what Pippy Pony said on my behalf to protect me when she was a wolf last game... "She's kind of a newb, give her a break, this sounds like her

This rubs me the wrong way.....

On second thought, reading through all of this again....

Greeny
Greeny's comment does totally come off as a wolf with nothing better to say that wants to be seen saying something. But Greeny is prone to those kinds of errors as a villager (making a candid comment that all villagers should know to avoid to avoid confusing people). I agree now with LIS and others who felt it twist their gut a little.

Staff
OTOH, even as a noob I have never seen, something about Staff's post seems contrived, versus Greeny who seems candid. Candid wolf vs villager remains to be seen. In any case, contrived always pings me more than any kind of nooby slip up or traditionally "wolfy" things being done by a noob or part of someone's typical play.

Dy
Initially since I agreed with Dy's reasoning on Pippy vs Allie, I took it all for granted. I see now what Mel was saying about Dy being aggressive and defensive at the same time. That could be her normal play, and Lord knows I'm guilty of same. But the offer to link to an outside site for meta... just feels contrived on reread.

Kcough
Now I see that kcough's post essentially agreed with Dy and my feeling on Pippy's defense, but now I see what she was finding fault in, in Dy. Still don't know what to make of that in light of Pippy thinking kcough seemed off for finding fault in FTB (addressed below). Sometimes I have a tendency to back off on people that get aggressive toward me, but that's no way to stand up to a potential wolf for village. Which could be kcough is trying to do thinking I'm a wolf.

Pippy
At this point, being so confused about everyone else, and not sure what to make of Kcough vs Pippy, I can't read Pippy as much as I can analyze everyone else's read of Pippy. Canary in the goldmine.

I was thinking about this “you can PM the person above” thing and realized it is a giant telephone string in each region. ie if player d can talk to player c can talk to player b can talk to player a... but then there might be wolves in those links.
And, in reality it works out as “you can pm above and below” in reality unless it is intended to be one-Way PMs.

This has been “FTB’s deep thoughts” tune in next time for more randomness.


Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile

FTB
Actually, this post from FTB is thoughtful, and so I don't think it can be dismissed as wolfy fluffy "pretend to help village" at this point. Contributing actual thoughts is no more wolfy than all the people who haven't said much so far.
 
On second thought, reading through all of this again....

Greeny
Greeny's comment does totally come off as a wolf with nothing better to say that wants to be seen saying something. But Greeny is prone to those kinds of errors as a villager (making a candid comment that all villagers should know to avoid to avoid confusing people). I agree now with LIS and others who felt it twist their gut a little.

Staff
OTOH, even as a noob I have never seen, something about Staff's post seems contrived, versus Greeny who seems candid. Candid wolf vs villager remains to be seen. In any case, contrived always pings me more than any kind of nooby slip up or traditionally "wolfy" things being done by a noob or part of someone's typical play.

Dy
Initially since I agreed with Dy's reasoning on Pippy vs Allie, I took it all for granted. I see now what Mel was saying about Dy being aggressive and defensive at the same time. That could be her normal play, and Lord knows I'm guilty of same. But the offer to link to an outside site for meta... just feels contrived on reread.

Kcough
Now I see that kcough's post essentially agreed with Dy and my feeling on Pippy's defense, but now I see what she was finding fault in, in Dy. Still don't know what to make of that in light of Pippy thinking kcough seemed off for finding fault in FTB (addressed below). Sometimes I have a tendency to back off on people that get aggressive toward me, but that's no way to stand up to a potential wolf for village. Which could be kcough is trying to do thinking I'm a wolf.

Pippy
At this point, being so confused about everyone else, and not sure what to make of Kcough vs Pippy, I can't read Pippy as much as I can analyze everyone else's read of Pippy. Canary in the goldmine.



FTB
Actually, this post from FTB is thoughtful, and so I don't think it can be dismissed as wolfy fluffy "pretend to help village" at this point. Contributing actual thoughts is no more wolfy than all the people who haven't said much so far.
I'm not aware of much (any) pippy vs KC action but I'm interested to hear more.

Your defense of FTB s post is also interesting to me.

Sent from my [device_name] using SDN mobile
 
I'm not a fan of "if I were a wolf I would/ wouldn't do X" type logic, because as you say it's WIFOM, there's no way to prove you're not doing the opposite of what's expected to throw people off. That said, which game were you a wolf in? I haven't played with you before, so I may take a look at that.

Here's a link to an article I really liked about WIFOM.

Let's talk about WIFOM - MafiaWiki

"Please don't ridicule people because they "use WIFOM arguments." Because as I believe I have just proven, concisely and strongly, every argument is ultimately victim to the WIFOM category. We can debate back and forth, "If X were wrong, he'd never do this!" "What? That's just what she wants us to think!" "That's stupid!" "You're stupid!". But ultimately we need to come to a mutual agreement about how certain persons act, and we shouldn't feel scared if we are incorrect.

The more active and vocal a person is, the more likely they are to be in the public's consciousness, and the more likely they are not only to be criticized for, but also to be investigated. This in no way is what the other people are seeking. I am firmly of the opinion that other people simply wouldn't do what I've been doing, and I ask you to look inside and realize that I am right."

Basically, all arguments are subject to WIFOM. So when you ask yourself if someone is acting as villager or as wolf, you just have to make a judgment call what makes the most sense based on all your data points in game and your meta read, for that person. That's how I do it, anyway.

“If I were a wolf....” is pretty much what Crayola offers every single game. Crayola spends 90% of his/her posts talking about Crayola.

Cray cray is a mighty she-woman. How do you not know this when I spend all this time talking about myself????

is it wolfy for her? I think I've played exactly 1 game with her

The WIFOM? Not at all wolfy for her.

The overreaction? I guess, in all honesty, not much. She tends to get verbosely defensive quickly. But that one felt like a lot even for Crayola.

I dunno. It’s a good point. Maybe I should move my vote. Hmm.

I just keep wishing CrayCray would move from 75% defensive play to 75% offensive play.

LOL, the one time I wolfed so many people had me pegged for sure because I didn't sound right, and I wasn't defensive enough. Turns out I can't actually manufacture the overreaction.

Fair point, though. It does help to have honest straightforward (yeah, this is me trying to be straightforward) play as a meta you build for the village.

I really would like to hear more from Allie today to decide if I want to keep my vote there. Also having slight feels for FTB and Crayola, but willing to hold off on Crayola for now if she's always like this.

Always like this.

ETA:

the thread where I wolfed with LIS, Pippy, and StayPos:

♪ ♫ Every Day I'm Shufflin' WW Game Thread ♫ ♪

Summary: LIS is the sort of villager that is so hard to catch when wolfing that he's terrifying. StayPos plays more innocent than she is. Pippy is just pure fun evil. I'm.... Cray cray?
 
On second thought, reading through all of this again....

Greeny
Greeny's comment does totally come off as a wolf with nothing better to say that wants to be seen saying something. But Greeny is prone to those kinds of errors as a villager (making a candid comment that all villagers should know to avoid to avoid confusing people). I agree now with LIS and others who felt it twist their gut a little.

Staff
OTOH, even as a noob I have never seen, something about Staff's post seems contrived, versus Greeny who seems candid. Candid wolf vs villager remains to be seen. In any case, contrived always pings me more than any kind of nooby slip up or traditionally "wolfy" things being done by a noob or part of someone's typical play.

Dy
Initially since I agreed with Dy's reasoning on Pippy vs Allie, I took it all for granted. I see now what Mel was saying about Dy being aggressive and defensive at the same time. That could be her normal play, and Lord knows I'm guilty of same. But the offer to link to an outside site for meta... just feels contrived on reread.

Kcough
Now I see that kcough's post essentially agreed with Dy and my feeling on Pippy's defense, but now I see what she was finding fault in, in Dy. Still don't know what to make of that in light of Pippy thinking kcough seemed off for finding fault in FTB (addressed below). Sometimes I have a tendency to back off on people that get aggressive toward me, but that's no way to stand up to a potential wolf for village. Which could be kcough is trying to do thinking I'm a wolf.

Pippy
At this point, being so confused about everyone else, and not sure what to make of Kcough vs Pippy, I can't read Pippy as much as I can analyze everyone else's read of Pippy. Canary in the goldmine.



FTB
Actually, this post from FTB is thoughtful, and so I don't think it can be dismissed as wolfy fluffy "pretend to help village" at this point. Contributing actual thoughts is no more wolfy than all the people who haven't said much so far.

Are these organized from least to most sketchy or vice versa?
 
I said I may come back to her? But it's not like it was an unreasoned vote, so also yes. I would re-evaluate something like that based off of lynch information. Not sure why that is problematic?

Just seems awfully early for a “I’m coming back to you if so-n-so flips village” kinda thing.
 
Actually, this post from FTB is thoughtful, and so I don't think it can be dismissed as wolfy fluffy "pretend to help village" at this point. Contributing actual thoughts is no more wolfy than all the people who haven't said much so far.

Mansplaining an already-clear game mechanism is thoughtful?

Not buying it.
 
Cray cray is a mighty she-woman. How do you not know this when I spend all this time talking about myself????

[…]

Cray cray?

Sorry. I am oblivious to some things. And notorious for gender-bending. I mean, it isn’t really a game until I have voted for someone who isn’t even playing and butchered their gender at the same time.

With regard to CrayCray, it is meant affectionately, not insultingly.
 
Top