Just saying, you were on all day yesterday and apparently reread everything and still the only things you want to point out are quiet players and a last minute waffle?
What I've been doing is going to their page and looking at their 'posts' tab.
Click the search icon while in this thread
How would that start a chaos hunt? That makes no sense
We will see based on what pippy's response is.
Why based on Pippy's response?
Why not?
Coffee, out of curiosity, did you happen to look at the timestamp on those reads I posted?
I didn't see @Lawper ask that, sorry.
I don't get what you are saying here. The use of the word "why" is now trademarked by AM? Do you think Lawper is coming across as wolfy?
Why? You have no one else you suspect besides me all of a sudden?
Why why not?
That's an assumption you're deciding to make.
Yeah, I also assumed the sky was blue. Sometimes you run with tried-and-proven methods.
Yeah, but that is the right assumption to be making in terms of hunting wolves.
Antagonist: a person who actively opposes or is hostile to someone or something; an adversary.
I like to think I am an open minded person. What do you think about the question I asked about Doggo's ability? Specifically, how might that align with your definition of antagonist?
1. No, tagging quiet players is fine. Based on the wording of your post, it reads ike you were saying that's where you want to look. As far as my waffle, as lawper had pointed out, I didn't want to lynch stagg, and defended him when I was on in the afternoon. I had planned to stay on mpm, even despite bank's vouch, but I noticed Stagg had tied it with minutes to go. Knowing two people would go down, I was willing to go against my feelings to lynch Stagg. Immediately afterwards, I saw I could vote doggo instead.Coffee, out of curiosity, did you happen to look at the timestamp on those reads I posted?
In any case, that is a misrepresentation of what I said. I tagged quiet players because I want to hear more from them. Do you have an issue with me asking for more from quiet players?
Just because I didn't do a huge quote dump on like 12 people doesn't mean I am not thinking about my reads or that I don't actually have things that I am considering for those people. You should be able to get a sense of my feelings on a lot of those things from posts that I made throughout the day yesterday. If you can't, ask me questions instead of making bratty comments because you don't like someone calling you out for last minute waffles that looked like you might have been trying to save someone.
I didn't see @Lawper ask that, sorry.
I voted for Skim primarily because every single one of her initial posts was qualified with some statement about it not being real/the vote being temporary. I can go back and pull those quotes for you if you want, but that is why I initially voted there, and I was not the only person who noticed the fluffiness. It also looks to me like she is leaning a little bit on SOV to back her up, and it is giving me pockety vibes.
I also thought her Mel vote yesterday was a weak sell, and since some of the things Mel and AM have been saying have also been pinging me a little bit, and they were arguing between themselves, I liked/still like the vote for the info it potentially provides on other players.
However, the thing she mentioned about her cousin is real, and I am not going to be voting there today to cut her a break, because that's terrible and I feel badly for her and her family & don't think she should be worried about people going after her in a game right now regardless of her affiliation.
I don't get what you are saying here. The use of the word "why" is now trademarked by AM? Do you think Lawper is coming across as wolfy?
I can't vote for you, so if I was leaning you wolfy based on your response, I'd need to re-evaluate players based on their interactions with you.
Your caveat makes your entire post the equivalent of a shrug with a simpering half-smile. It’s like plain mashed potatoes, no salt or butter or gravy. Just bland “here’s a post that might seem like I’m contributing but I’m actually not really saying anything because it can be interpreted whatever way I want it to be thanks to my lil friend ms. caveat”. So that earned you an eye roll.
Why should I have followed up?
I didn't say you should. It would've been in character if you had, though.
Sounds like a knight.
What interesting is that I don't think there's been a single game where I wasn't called out of meta.
Maybe you should develop a more consistent meta
Well your meta is well known.
Exhibit A.
Day 3 Official Lynch Tally
koffee (2) - genny, pippy
Stagg (1) - zigjaz
miz (1) - lawpy
4/29
Missing: @capri1722 @Jahboi @StayingPositive2017 @Stagg737 @allieh8607 @emlady09 @Barkley13 @SARdoghandler @mizchiefmanaged @Skimble @mypetmoose @Dinashadow @johnnaboo @Animal Midwife @CoffeeQuestionMark @Melchizedek @dolphin106258 @PrincessButterCup @Ms Procrastinator @StartingoverVet @grebes4lyfe @kcoughli @muttmanager @Matthew9Thirtyfive @Trilt
Deadline 10pm est (~10 hours)
PS sorry for the early tags but I head to work soon. Please help Navi out by keeping a tally going
I stayed with you because you coming in and saying that the vote was lazy and not really anything else wasn’t enough to get me to move especially when I didn’t really have strong feelings on anyone else at that point
Nope, especially after her posts last night where she hinted at her role
