Fire Emblem: Three HoWWses Game Thread

[Animal Midwife]

---

Members do not see this ad.

My bad. I thought exclusive meant “against village”

It does. Hence why a villager can't be "against village." They are the village.

Again, as a note though, exclusives are often also against wolves.

 

[Santygrass]

Exclusvity = Cant win with another faction 🤔

I thought that was the standard term

 

[Santygrass]

Exclusvity = Cant win with another faction 🤔

I thought that was the standard term

As in, Church and Black Eagles are mutually exclusive with each other its the most likely scenario.

Maybe they could win with another non wolves factions, being more likely for that to be possible with church than Black Eagles fmpov

So the 'hurr durr church bad exclusive sus' I think its most likely to come from someone from Black Eagles when reading the game. That or wolves ofc

 

[motheatenlysis]

I doubt I'm gonna convince you lol

Try?

Also just realized I didn't vote, yeet Miranda
@kaydubs

 

[Animal Midwife]

Exclusvity = Cant win with another faction 🤔

I thought that was the standard term

Not here, at least. Even survivors can only win with one main faction when push comes to shove.

 

[Wiisp]

Ohh ya that's a thing that could exist

 

[Santygrass]

Not here, at least. Even survivors can only win with one main faction when push comes to shove.

*Talks with foreign accent*

At least from where I come from they could win with anyone, it depends on how gamestate evolves.

Exclusivity means that is impossible from one faction to win with another faction (Could be one or the rest), hence why the 'exclusive'

So if I said / sa exclusive I am mostly refering to that definition fwiw

 

[Animal Midwife]

*Talks with foreign accent*

At least from where I come from they could win with anyone, it depends on how gamestate evolves.

Exclusivity means that is impossible from one faction to win with another faction (Could be one or the rest), hence why the 'exclusive'

So if I said / sa exclusive I am mostly refering to that definition fwiw

Alright. When I say exclusive, I mean that, even if we eliminate all wolves, we'll still lose unless we kill said exclusives in time.

 

[Santygrass]

Alright. When I say exclusive, I mean that, even if we eliminate all wolves, we'll still lose unless we kill said exclusives in time.

Gotcha
Fwiw , I think if there is a faction like that, it'll be specified in your wincon to eliminate them.

This is more speculative of course, but since it represents what happens in the games and on thread (with some people claiming wanting a faction deaded or mentioning others in their PM)

But I could be wrong, we'll see later I'd say

 

[Lawpy]

@Santygrass how are you reading SOV?

 

[justafluff]

Alright. When I say exclusive, I mean that, even if we eliminate all wolves, we'll still lose unless we kill said exclusives in time.

Ok. No in that sense I don’t think eliminating the church is exclusive.

 

[Santygrass]

@Santygrass how are you reading SOV?

Village, though I am avoiding to engage in the 'solving approach' topic because even if I disagree with it on a base level, its not productive discussion rn and I can vibe with their reads regardless

 

[alleycat03]

ok, so either you shoot fluff and then we yeet her (so we lose 2 villagers), or we have to spend 2 yeet cycles to get rid of fluff the wolf, which costs us 3 villagers.

I'm probably just dumb but how does 2 yeet cycles = 3 villagers? Are you referring to the NKs that would happen while we try to yeet Fluff?

 

[alleycat03]

Ugh again I wish @samac was alive so I could ask her about her fluff read

I think the only reason we decided not to yeet fluff and back off of her wolf read was SAR's "please don't yeet her," right? I'm feeling like that made most of us let our guards down with fluff and start reading her posts with village-colored glasses. Then samac came in and wanted to yeet her to the moon. And maybe that's the right call

Since I didn't read those pages I'm probably missing some context. Why did Samac want to yeet Fluff? Did she share her reasoning?

 

[justafluff]

Since I didn't read those pages I'm probably missing some context. Why did Samac want to yeet Fluff? Did she share her reasoning?

Keep reading 😊

 

[alleycat03]

could be the case with Miranda though, but no has vouched for them, not that I think anyone would, its possible they are affiliated with both the church and the sneks

Who are you referring to? Miranda?

 

[alleycat03]

Keep reading 😊

Lol I'm not going to

Vet school said no

 

[justafluff]

Lol I'm not going to

Vet school said no

Short story: it was probably samac’s factional agenda to yeet church members

 

[Wiisp]

I low key want to remove Midwife from the game

 

[Wiisp]

I shouldve shot her honestly

 

[alleycat03]

I low key want to remove Midwife from the game

Why?

 

[Lawpy]

I shouldve shot her honestly

Wispy why

 

[Wiisp]

Cause their posts are exhausting

 

[Wiisp]

Who are you referring to? Miranda?

Miranda's character yes, even if black eagles have a secondary Wisconsin of wanting the church dead, and yes in the game theh did align with the seeks, but I need to santy to clarify since I never finished the game, but the black eagle route still ends up fighting the seeks, correct

@Santygrass

 

[Wiisp]

Wincon autocorrectsd to Wisconsin lol

 

[Wiisp]

The snakes*, got dmn auto correct lol

 

[Animal Midwife]

Ohh ya that's a thing that could exist

I missed this post earlier, but who were you talking to?

 

[Wondalfy]

Can we stop being negative about people please. I don't like that kind of environment and really think it ruins some of the fun of the game. It's one thing to criticize a post/posts. It's another to criticize an entire player & say a player is bad at playing/insulting them on the way they play/talk/etc

 

[supershorty]

Can we stop being negative about people please. I don't like that kind of environment and really think it ruins some of the fun of the game. It's one thing to criticize a post/posts. It's another to criticize an entire player & say a player is bad at playing/insulting them on the way they play/talk/etc

**************
Like
Retweet
Upvote
Subscribe
**************

 

[Lawpy]

Can we stop being negative about people please. I don't like that kind of environment and really think it ruins some of the fun of the game. It's one thing to criticize a post/posts. It's another to criticize an entire player & say a player is bad at playing/insulting them on the way they play/talk/etc

I thought it was a point on strategy

 

[Lawpy]

Shorty pls, i’m actually being serious but your reactions are getting in the way so i can’t actually comment on this to you directly.

 

[genny]

I thought it was a point on strategy

You might be looking at the wrong post.

 

[supershorty]

I thought it was a point on strategy

*************
If strategy involves actively denigrating other players, a different strategy needs to be used.

BE CIVIL.
*************

 

[Santygrass]

Miranda's character yes, even if black eagles have a secondary Wisconsin of wanting the church dead, and yes in the game theh did align with the seeks, but I need to santy to clarify since I never finished the game, but the black eagle route still ends up fighting the seeks, correct

@Santygrass

Its mostly said in the ending.

As in: They have a temporary alliance with TWSID and the plan is to wipe them out later when the war ends, which happens mostly in the ending writeup.

So Black Eagles and TWSID are like two allies fighting a common enemy (church) that also plan to take care of each other later .


Even without that bit of flavor, we know that there is a tradiniotal wolfpack so for all effects I think we should assume TWSID are bad for everyone, even tho maybe some factions appreciate a little bit more killing amd others not maybe

 

[Lawpy]

You might be looking at the wrong post.

Wispy is frustrated with AM as he said so multiple times before. SOV made a case for why he thinks AM is wolfy. Yes being civil is important but there could be a legitimate reason for Wispy’s frustration, and i would appreciate if the tots can reserve their commentary in the signup thread

 

[genny]

Wispy is frustrated with AM as he said so multiple times before. SOV made a case for why he thinks AM is wolfy. Yes being civil is important but there could be a legitimate reason for Wispy’s frustration, and i would appreciate if the tots can reserve their commentary in the signup thread

Everyone get frustrated with another player at some point. The difference is owning the frustration (it exhausts me to read this) vs. pushing it on another player (they’re exhausting). The tone it sets for gameplay is something I think we try to protect here.

 

[Lawpy]

Everyone get frustrated with another player at some point. The difference is owning the frustration (it exhausts me to read this) vs. pushing it on another player (they’re exhausting). The tone it sets for gameplay is something I think we try to protect here.

Oh i don’t disagree with this nor Wondas’s earlier post regarding keeping the thread in healthy state.

But the reasons for frustration are insightful from a strategy perspective.

 

[holdthemayo]

I think Fluff is a hit, I don’t have any proof of that directly, but I think she’s being very wolfy. I think her lying about the SAR thing is just more evidence that’s she’s been dishonest.

I’m also just sick of the constant narrative she’s been pushing that “SAR vouched for me”. Because NO that’s not even remotely true. She keeps pushing this lie that SAR vouched for her, and that’s NOT what’s going on here.

Maybe I am misinterpreting the thing with Nate because I’m tunneling this pretty deep, but come on, you have to see she’s been disingenuously pushing that SAR vouched for her, which is not the reality of the situation at all. Surely you see that?

If you’re so sure and u have samacs shot, why not just shoot?

 

[Lawpy]

If you’re so sure and u have samacs shot, why not just shoot?

That’s what i’m wondering tbh

 

[Animal Midwife]

If you’re so sure and u have samacs shot, why not just shoot?

It sounds like he doesn't want SAR to die.

 

[chicandtoughness]

If you’re so sure and u have samacs shot, why not just shoot?

Because Zenge thinks SAR is village, and the shot would deflect onto SAR.

 

[Lawpy]

It sounds like he doesn't want SAR to die.

Because Zenge thinks SAR is village, and the shot would deflect onto SAR.

I think really the main struggle i’m having is all these conflicting pieces of information, some partly from fluffy herself as chics mentioned earlier that’s making it difficult to understand what’s going on

 

[motheatenlysis]

It sounds like he doesn't want SAR to die.

Are we sure SAR would die?

 

[Animal Midwife]

Are we sure SAR would die?

Yes, because he seered her. And SAR confirmed it.

 

[Lawpy]

She said soft vouch, not hard vouch. I listed two other games in immediate recent history when she soft vouched for the game winning scum. I see multiple affiliation combinations. If you don't want to vote him, that's fine. But I need a REAL vouch.

I mentioned 99% certain with the info I have from you. I'm not a wolf, so Nate isn't either. That's your hard vouch.

If you are basing that vouch on affiliation that can’t be a hard vouch, just saying.

Hard soft whatever. I really don't think Nate's a wolf.

Like here is an earlier example

 

[holdthemayo]

so you're shooting fluff then?

By half a day again

 

[Lawpy]

By half a day again

How are you reading fluffy?

 

[Zenge142]

If you’re so sure and u have samacs shot, why not just shoot?

That’s what i’m wondering tbh

Seriously are you even reading the thread?

Because Zenge thinks SAR is village, and the shot would deflect onto SAR.

Thank you.

 

[motheatenlysis]

Yes, because he seered her. And SAR confirmed it.

Thanks for the reminder! I read a lot last night and fell asleep with the thread up on my phone.

 

[Zenge142]

Yes, because he seered her. And SAR confirmed it.

Not to get into semantics but it’s a role copy ability.