Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
It does. Hence why a villager can't be "against village." They are the village.
Again, as a note though, exclusives are often also against wolves.
-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
Fire Emblem: Three HoWWses Game Thread
Started by SportPonies
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
Again, as a note though, exclusives are often also against wolves.
Exclusvity = Cant win with another faction 🤔
I thought that was the standard term
I thought that was the standard term
As in, Church and Black Eagles are mutually exclusive with each other its the most likely scenario.
Maybe they could win with another non wolves factions, being more likely for that to be possible with church than Black Eagles fmpov
So the 'hurr durr church bad exclusive sus' I think its most likely to come from someone from Black Eagles when reading the game. That or wolves ofc
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Not here, at least. Even survivors can only win with one main faction when push comes to shove.
*Talks with foreign accent*
At least from where I come from they could win with anyone, it depends on how gamestate evolves.
Exclusivity means that is impossible from one faction to win with another faction (Could be one or the rest), hence why the 'exclusive'
So if I said / sa exclusive I am mostly refering to that definition fwiw
Alright. When I say exclusive, I mean that, even if we eliminate all wolves, we'll still lose unless we kill said exclusives in time.
Gotcha
Fwiw , I think if there is a faction like that, it'll be specified in your wincon to eliminate them.
This is more speculative of course, but since it represents what happens in the games and on thread (with some people claiming wanting a faction deaded or mentioning others in their PM)
But I could be wrong, we'll see later I'd say
@Santygrass how are you reading SOV?
justafluff
Good skelegg
Ok. No in that sense I don’t think eliminating the church is exclusive.
Village, though I am avoiding to engage in the 'solving approach' topic because even if I disagree with it on a base level, its not productive discussion rn and I can vibe with their reads regardless
I'm probably just dumb but how does 2 yeet cycles = 3 villagers? Are you referring to the NKs that would happen while we try to yeet Fluff?
Since I didn't read those pages I'm probably missing some context. Why did Samac want to yeet Fluff? Did she share her reasoning?
justafluff
Good skelegg
Keep reading 😊
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Who are you referring to? Miranda?
justafluff
Good skelegg
Short story: it was probably samac’s factional agenda to yeet church members
Why?
Wispy why
Wiisp
Full Member
Miranda's character yes, even if black eagles have a secondary Wisconsin of wanting the church dead, and yes in the game theh did align with the seeks, but I need to santy to clarify since I never finished the game, but the black eagle route still ends up fighting the seeks, correct
@Santygrass
I missed this post earlier, but who were you talking to?
Can we stop being negative about people please. I don't like that kind of environment and really think it ruins some of the fun of the game. It's one thing to criticize a post/posts. It's another to criticize an entire player & say a player is bad at playing/insulting them on the way they play/talk/etc
supershorty
Don't look so vexed, toots.
Administrator
Volunteer Staff
Lifetime Donor
10+ Year Member
I thought it was a point on strategy
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Shorty pls, i’m actually being serious but your reactions are getting in the way so i can’t actually comment on this to you directly.
You might be looking at the wrong post.
supershorty
Don't look so vexed, toots.
Administrator
Volunteer Staff
Lifetime Donor
10+ Year Member
*************
If strategy involves actively denigrating other players, a different strategy needs to be used.
BE CIVIL.
*************
Its mostly said in the ending.
As in: They have a temporary alliance with TWSID and the plan is to wipe them out later when the war ends, which happens mostly in the ending writeup.
So Black Eagles and TWSID are like two allies fighting a common enemy (church) that also plan to take care of each other later .
Even without that bit of flavor, we know that there is a tradiniotal wolfpack so for all effects I think we should assume TWSID are bad for everyone, even tho maybe some factions appreciate a little bit more killing amd others not maybe
Wispy is frustrated with AM as he said so multiple times before. SOV made a case for why he thinks AM is wolfy. Yes being civil is important but there could be a legitimate reason for Wispy’s frustration, and i would appreciate if the tots can reserve their commentary in the signup thread
Everyone get frustrated with another player at some point. The difference is owning the frustration (it exhausts me to read this) vs. pushing it on another player (they’re exhausting). The tone it sets for gameplay is something I think we try to protect here.
Oh i don’t disagree with this nor Wondas’s earlier post regarding keeping the thread in healthy state.
But the reasons for frustration are insightful from a strategy perspective.
If you’re so sure and u have samacs shot, why not just shoot?
That’s what i’m wondering tbh
It sounds like he doesn't want SAR to die.
Because Zenge thinks SAR is village, and the shot would deflect onto SAR.
I think really the main struggle i’m having is all these conflicting pieces of information, some partly from fluffy herself as chics mentioned earlier that’s making it difficult to understand what’s going on
Are we sure SAR would die?
Yes, because he seered her. And SAR confirmed it.
She said soft vouch, not hard vouch. I listed two other games in immediate recent history when she soft vouched for the game winning scum. I see multiple affiliation combinations. If you don't want to vote him, that's fine. But I need a REAL vouch.
Like here is an earlier example
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
How are you reading fluffy?
By half a day again
Seriously are you even reading the thread?
Thank you.
Thanks for the reminder! I read a lot last night and fell asleep with the thread up on my phone.
Not to get into semantics but it’s a role copy ability.
