I don’t think asking MK the logistics of the role she already revealed is necessarily fishing. But I think it would be fair to hold something back if there’s something about the specifics she doesn’t want to share
I mean. To me it looks like you killed Greedy while he was town-reading you before he could change his mind.
That’s probably possible but it’s a mechanics question I would ask the mods
I was the conductor of the train yesterday but dropped it when my townreads were town-reading her. I can't fathom any other reason Greedy would be dead, though.
wait, you voted KJQ yesterday? not the final vote i mean, but before that?
Vampy you know I like you but this gives me the ick
I’d never get rid of someone double voting with me as scum lol I am far to anxious when I’m scum to get rid of my only real in-thread support especially if I’m already down a teammate. Plus, he was so sure there had to be town KP why would I waste a scum nightkill on him? I just don’t think this “what if” makes sense.
No, my only vote was on Clem.
Just like your heart 😔
life imitates art 😫
I am not buying the self-meta. genny, myself, and debatably mkg all came off the Clem vote widely townread; any one of us would make sense as the N1 death. Yet Greedy, who has not played with anyone except yourself, dies?
@KayJayQueue can I get your thoughts on this point madrigal made about Vamp’s behavior at EOD?
this is exactly what i said earlier and it was dismissed because i scum read SAR but chose not to vote for her anyway because i couldnt find substatial reasoning to feel secure in my read.
if anyone has opinions on my EOD behavior, do share. because i was originally town read by everyone who participated in GTH. PSV and I are the only ones. so, i want to know if and what has changed.
You can’t be serious. This is exactly why I would never be killing greedy!!! This gives me nothing if I’m scum. I lose out on killing a PR and I lose my only support?? This is quite literally a TERRIBLE move for scum EXCEPT in the world that they use it to get me mislimmed. Mkg voted me yesterday and claimed a PR. And you think as scum I’d shoot greedy?! You have to really think I’m stupid or you’d have to really think that I THINK I’m extremely clever.
I’ve gone into it in detail over the night, did you catch up fully on everything that was posted in the last day?
I thought you unpaired SAR/clem, what’s changed?
genny is definitely unpaired with clem imo. it sort of parallels that with D1 from the last game i read
i'm considering the possibility the wagons are W/W, and i'm doing some rereading that may result in changing reads.
What would the 1 be? Only thing that makes sense is a jester that needed/wanted to die. Unless there’s a 3p I’m not remembering that would fit how greedy played day 1.
I don’t believe her EoD vote makes any sense with her stated reads before and after Clem was flipped.
reading vampy's GTH posted >2 hours before day close, still scum reads KJQ.
But also scumreads SAR and town reads Clem. She has stated many times that she voted with full knowledge the wagons were
again, if it was anyone else, you wouldn't care. but its the fact that it's you that its become such a big deal.
Neutral, maybe? I'm just musing.
if you are so sure that i am lying, up me and make your solid case against me. i'm literally being open and honest. you want me to lie? because if you want me to start lying, then sure, i'll go ahead and start throwing the game.
in reference to sar and clem wagons
Explain this then. She doesn’t sus me but votes for me to reaction test greedy instead of voting a scumread, SAR, which she claimed her read on has not changed. (she says this in a later post) She says I’m STILL neutral-town leaning. Which means that’s what she thought at EoD.
I don’t want you to lie. I’m simply going off of what you’ve been saying and it seems inconsistent to me.
you are singling out one thing i said in this entire post.
Reposting my theory for what happened at EoD. I could be wrong but I’d say people should read pages 14-15 to understand my POV as well as vampy’s.
But then she says at night that she was reading me as neutral-town and her read on SAR (a scumread) never changed. I just don’t understand those statements coming from someone that voted me over SAR when a SAR vote could possibly save someone she townread.
But at night she claimed her read on SAR never changed. I asked her about it directly because I thought maybe that’s what happened and she stopped scumreading SAR but she denied that! So can anyone appreciate why this is so confusing to me?
so i admit i've been largely ignoring the night talk since i felt it's a bit too retrospective, unlike the real time discussions happening near the end of day that seems more organic
I would say don’t ignore night talk, it’s just as relevant to the game because people are questioning others, explaining their POVs, expanding on reads, etc.
