- Joined
- Jun 22, 2009
- Messages
- 2,374
- Reaction score
- 61
Ok, I see. This is another US news number that does not have much value. That is because Einstein have three times as many faculty members as Sinai (about 3K for Einstein whereas Sinai have only about a thousand). Maybe Einstein have a lot more part time faculty member compared to Sinai, I do not know. That's why the number is slightly low for Einstein. I do not think you are attacking Einstein and I am not trying to take anything away from Sinai, I just think the difference between Sinai and Einstein is not significant enough for one to give up over 80K in scholarship money to pick one over the other. I rest my case here.
I think it's significant enough to consider not taking the money. I think we determined 64k?. Would it be of more value if the published numbers were the same for Sinai and Einstein for all these metrics? LOL.
They use the same rules to qualify what faculty members are included in that statistic for each school. If anything, this just indicates that a larger majority of the faculty at Einstein aren't research-based. They are practicing physicians who aren't academic leaders in their fields. The mentality is different at Sinai, I'm trying to make the distinction that the environments/faculty are different between the two schools. I would normally never rely on such metrics to make a decision, but you claimed that my subjective opinions were useless so I tried to provide something else, more concrete. I get the feeling that basically anything I say trying to differentiate Sinai from Einstein is going to be shot down.
At my Stanford interview, I had a 5-minute string of questioning where my interviewer tried to gauge my understanding of the difficulty of entering academic medicine (because that's what I was interested in). After, he commented on his own journey. He was an Einstein grad and told me that his med school institution wasn't focused on research and that he didn't get great experiences there as a medical student with regards to publishing and conducting original research, because "that wasn't the focus of Einstein, like it is here at Stanford". He struggled and had to spend two extra years in fellowship to prove his research capacity. Again, an anecdote...but reasons why I was never really keen on Einstein as a powerful academic center.
Last edited: