I went to a great talk at AALAS about how animal rights activists are in colleges and teaching classes like the one you're describing. It's awful because they are targeting people during very formative years, filling their heads with lies and misinformation based on emotion rather than fact, and then basically setting them up to go on to push for laws that make any animal work more and more challenging to do. And not actually teaching or showing people all the laws and regulations that actually already exist for the various areas of animal work (research, agriculture, etc) or the necessity for these areas of work. People literally don't understand why animal research is still necessary.
On a side rant, I saw an ad the other day from Pfizer about COVID19 and how science and scientists are working to find treatments and vaccine to combat it, not ONE SECOND of footage showed animals in research. It drives me nuts because this is all the public sees; people in lab coats and masks and goggles swirling beakers of colored liquids but not connecting this to the fact that animal research is going to be imperative to developing a vaccine and testing novel drug therapies.
Yeah...its actually worse than that in this case because the whole point this professor has tried to make is that regulations to protect animals don't actually exist. She disparages the animal welfare act, humane slaughter regulations, etc. as ineffective, created by biased organizations and serving only to actually help people exploit and mistreat animals (hence having the president of the American anti-vivisection society be the one to teach these students about the animal welfare act). Also, completely incorrect information was presented about which animals are covered, which I tried to correct and was instantly shut down.
Wven when discussing veterinary malpractice, she was basically setting it up like vets are the enemy and the legal system lets them literally get away with murder (her malpractice example was "you take your dog to the vet for surgery, the vet beats your dog to death, throws it down the stairs, and then claims it died of a heart attack when you come to pick it up"...aside from the fact that that's STRAIGHT ABUSE, not actual malpractice where a medical decision causes harm). They're literally teaching that animal use in all industries is unregulated, farmers are intentionally cruel and torture their animals, and veterinarians will murder your dog and get away with it. It makes my blood boil.
And I 1000% agree with your side rant...I've been sharing articles on facebook trying to highlight the animal research component of things, but that just resulted in my family telling me I need to stop sharing those types of things because its "inflammatory".
😡
Also write a review for the class of how its biased and shouldn't be a campus funded class if it's not going to be an actual animal law class. I get having the various perspectives, but having it be animal rights based isnt okay since that's not how animal law actually works
Yup, full on plan on blasting the biased nature of the course on the evaluation. I honestly usually don't fill out course evaluations...but I CAN'T WAIT. I've also talked to a few people in the vet school about this class and how damaging I feel it is...and how inexcusable it is to be so biased and willfully ignorant about all things animal/regulatory/welfare based when they have a veterinary school literally 10 minutes away
Oh also
@altadama I would be spamming that class with links to
Speaking of Research or
Foundation for Biomedical Research | Animal Research etc. Granted I am at a very different part of my career and don't need the class for anything.
Also if it's not too late, 100% don't go to the class with that speaker. Or do what others suggest and connect via zoom and then peace out mentally and browse reddit or something. Mute it and if someone asks why you didn't speak up just say your audio wasn't working great.
I do post articles from AMP and other places about research and try to counter some of the misinformation, but no one listens. There was a lecture where they discussed agriculture and they were talking about how "vets feed animals chemicals!", showing farrowing crates and mislabeling them as gestation stalls, etc. I tried to share information about the veterinary feed directive, changing views on antimicrobial use, welfare reasons behind calf hutches, farrowing crates etc. to at least try and show these things don't exist purely because "FARMERS AND VETS WANT TO TORTURE ANIMALS!!". Literally got no where because they're just not willing to listen.
I did go to the class and his definition of animal welfare and what it does was entirely factually incorrect, but of course my attempts to try and counter were completely dismissed as stupid and apparently as someone who isn't vegan I have no business "pretending to care about animals" and there's something morally wrong with me if I argue otherwise. I'm just so livid about everything this class stands for and the fact that its such an echo chamber of people confirming their own biases and then thinking that makes them qualified to pass judgement and regulations about how people deal with animals.
I can't wait to hand in my final paper and do my presentation about the importance of animal research, how everyone benefits from it every single day (unless you don't use any kind of medication or commercial product ever), the actual definition of animal welfare. Also plan on correcting the misinformation that was presented about the definition of animal welfare, what the animal welfare act does and does not do, and discuss how compassionate management practices implemented by people educated in welfare, behavior, and animal physiology can fill in the gaps that may be present...as opposed to burying their head in the sand/pretending they don't benefit from the use of animals/disparaging entire industries and veterinarians just to make themselves feel better and attain some perceived moral high ground. Side note...I may fail this class but it'll be worth it.
And this isnt even some stupid undergrad class. This is considered a senior level class at the law school. The people in this class, learning this information, and truly believing these things are about to graduate from a professional program, with a JD, thinking they understand the issues and are the most qualified people to advocate for animals and regulate the various animal industries....