- Joined
- Jul 25, 2013
- Messages
- 2,707
- Reaction score
- 1,407
I'm honestly happy to lynch either of them. I feel like Cyndia is a sure bet but I guess we can always leave that until later.
******lynch STL******
******lynch STL******
Does that mean it's true that cyndia needs to be lynched repeatedly, then? Can we lynch her this round or was the "something different" about cyndia not referring to her now being lynchable? If she can't be, then I'll change my vote to STL.All I see that you posted is the vague one about Cyndia needing to be killed a certain number of times. Thing is, the info I got from someone else included a specific number.
I'm wondering the same thing.or was the "something different" about cyndia not referring to her now being lynchable?
I'm willing to bet that it might be. Although LIS made it seem like he knows the exact number of lynches needed to off Cyndia and instead he's going after Willow.I'm wondering the same thing.
You are a tad off your game, if you know the number of times, isn't it safer to crack away at that rather than go after other people that may be villagers? Think of it, isn't it better to take down an alpha wolf this turn and look into me next then to leave a wolf and go after a possible villager? Your logic isn't sound with me
This I can go with. Lynch STL.I'd rather dig out the rest of them and then deal with Cyndia rather than waste lynch after lynch..
Weird if it's already been surpassed. In that case, I'm fine lynching stl and then come back to cyndia later.Might be safer to crack away at it, but I was dubious about the number to begin with. In particular, because it already appeared to have been surpassed. But the source of the number is dead now, and died a villager, so ... something else is going on.
In any case, that's not my point. The info you allegedly intercepted should have had that number in it, but you say you just got some vague message about Cyndia needing to be killed a few times. That means either you or kaydubs are not telling the truth.
If it's already been surpassed that's definitely a red flag.Might be safer to crack away at it, but I was dubious about the number to begin with. In particular, because it already appeared to have been surpassed. But the source of the number is dead now, and died a villager, so ... something else is going on.
In any case, that's not my point. The info you allegedly intercepted should have had that number in it, but you say you just got some vague message about Cyndia needing to be killed a few times. That means either you or kaydubs are not telling the truth.
well, 4 does sound like death in a few of the eastern languages and you were the one that brought up the Japanese fisherman....BTW, I have to say, I'm really dubious they created a role that can escape death 4 times. That just seems weird. I kinda suspect/hope there's some other mechanic going on here.
*by another wolf or an item on the night prior to last nightI'm actually going to go ahead and lynch Cyndia.
My bet is that Cyndia was somehow protected by another wolf last or an item the night prior, because the 3 time lynch avoidance matches with the only bit of info I have. A wolf can't protect her from a lynch, so I'm all in on killing her.
That makes sense. I thought LIS meant we'd already lynched her enough times according to his info. If it was a night kill attempt, it could very well be protection or blocking or something. Worth another try anyway.I'm actually going to go ahead and lynch Cyndia.
My bet is that Cyndia was somehow protected by another wolf last or an item the night prior, because the 3 time lynch avoidance matches with the only bit of info I have. A wolf can't protect her from a lynch, so I'm all in on killing her.
That's an impressive typo.*by another wolf or an item on the night prior to last night
Why not say that earlier - that you get parts of PMs and not whole PMs? If you're telling the truth about intercepting the PM about Cyndia, that would explain why you only got part of the message.You are the frilledshark. you will get parts of pms/info from other players.
STL - is this an active role or a passive role.
DVMD - this is a passive role .
But the rest were whole pms, or at least it appears that the others were whole pms, so that's what I am confused about personallyWhy not say that earlier - that you get parts of PMs and not whole PMs? If you're telling the truth about intercepting the PM about Cyndia, that would explain why you only got part of the message.
No I'm not. Why do you think I am?lynch willow
WOLF
because I am the wobbegong sharkNo I'm not. Why do you think I am?
No you're not. I highly doubt there is a duplicate role with all the possible shark roles there are.because I am the wobbegong shark
Why are you just now coming out with this?Unlynch whoever, lynch willow
Swings revealed her role name to me on Saturday so unless theres two wobbegong sharks, willow's lying
Because Im just now reading the thread, instead of skimming (orientation started today) and I dont think its my place to reveal someone elses role nameWhy are you just now coming out with this?
are you?Are you a cobbler's wobbegong?
wait.. I already know the answer to that!are you?
Yes. That's why I was asking. There are multiple wobbegong species, so wondering if for some reason we have slightly different wobbegong roles. (I love that name for a shark, it makes me laugh whenever I type it.)wait.. I already know the answer to that!