- Joined
- Jul 23, 2013
- Messages
- 14,710
- Reaction score
- 28,621
Brunch not my breakfast my dear. I am classier than breakfast
Brunch not my breakfast my dear. I am classier than breakfast
I disagree, anonymous stuff is distracting and should almost universally be disregarded unless there is a very compelling reason not to. You are too many steps away for this to be a compelling reason at this pointLooks like Britzen moved, too.
On the gifs -- I know Ceke was auto-correcting to Cake on at least a few devices...I am kinda tempted to test the info to see if it's useful or just drunk mumbling.
Yep, and it's too early for anyone to have any concrete info to try to spread anonymously anyway.I disagree, anonymous stuff is distracting and should almost universally be disregarded unless there is a very compelling reason not to. You are too many steps away for this to be a compelling reason at this point
I mean like this vote in some ways, but do you feel like this is the most valuable information-wise?I was the one who revived pbc, always a proponent of using the revive early.
Looking back, I want to start on cyndia for my lunch and place a bit of pressure there and see how she reacts.
*************lynch cyndia*************
Data or information? I like it as a data point but information gain may not be as much as others. Also, I more am using it to see how she reacts, and then re-evaluate from thereI mean like this vote in some ways, but do you feel like this is the most valuable information-wise?
Pokemon game disagrees with youI disagree, anonymous stuff is distracting and should almost universally be disregarded unless there is a very compelling reason not to. You are too many steps away for this to be a compelling reason at this point
That falls into the compelling reasons not to category, and wasn't entirely anonymousPokemon game disagrees with you
Well I mean of course they did in that game.Pokemon game disagrees with you
I see it in retrospect. Just didn't seem out of place in real time. I guess you were just too good?*************
*************
Losing any sort of villager is bad, even if vanilla. Are you just giving up? Or are you going to try and convince us to keep you around once you get off work?? It always sets off flags for me when someone's defense is "I'm just vanilla so it's not a huge loss to lynch me"
I'm gonna go ahead with a lynch Queen of Slime (aka PBC)
the feels are high, especially from her "im just vanilla so it doesn't really matter anyway"
It's when AM turns into a turd and doesn't want to answer any questions or give any defense and people have to ask her a ridiculous amount of questions to get some sort of half-assed answer out of her because she doesn't want to be helpful or make things easier and it makes me want to lynch her every time even though I was a spectator and not playing.
Are you implying that AM is always basic even without the posting restriction.I see it in retrospect. Just didn't seem out of place in real time. I guess you were just too good?
Allie –
this post is weird. Basically saying “I like that everyone’s talking this game, I feel like I’m actually catching things now! Maybe I’ll come back later and tell you guys what I’m thinking.”
Then here says that they’ll probably switch their vote to someone who hasn’t checked in…
Just weird.
That falls into the compelling reasons not to category, and wasn't entirely anonymous
But the lulzWell I mean of course they did in that game.
You are using an irrelevant example of the dead having influence in that game, which is negated from me bringing back pbc, so there is no way she had information (or if it came from her, she can quite easily tell us that). So it's coming from a role. Usually if they are omnipotent, they have limited posting via posting restriction initially, and can use anonymous means. Aka I get the point you are making, but not much relevance to where we are st now
This must be why @Trilt likes you so muchI'd definitely switch to PBC to save myself, but earlier in that last 30, not timed a minute before close. As a wolf I've definitely pulled the vote flip at 9:59--you want to hold onto the swap as long as possible to assess whether you need to use it, reduce risk someone sees it as sketchy and reacts with a counter swap, etc.
....
I guess that makes the trout well seasoned....
The example that immediately comes to mind is the HP game, and there might be a titch of salt leftover from that game.
Why was it shady? Looked like legitimate, smart gameplay, saving herself.Lynch genny
That last second switch in voting was shady af, especially when she was on earlier and could have switched then or tried more to defend.
Don't put words in my mouth cheezyDAre you implying that AM is always basic even without the posting restriction.
The timing was shady, not the move itselfWhy was it shady? Looked like legitimate, smart gameplay, saving herself.
You're just mad it wasn't a tie. I was talking to AM, gave her time to switch, but she wasn't changing.The timing was shady, not the move itself
Yes but, just thinking it through, if she switched her vote sooner, it would give the rest of the players time to swing the vote back to her. By waiting, didn't she guarantee that she could swing the lynch away from herself at the last second?The timing was shady, not the move itself
But why did AM have to be the one to switch: Villager logic: I am villager, other person may not be, I should vote them so village doesn't lose a villager. You wanting someone else to have switched instead of you just seems off. If you wanted to keep your vote you say something like: "hey guys, I like my current vote but am switching for self preservation, anyone else feeling this person. I think we should vote them for *insert reason here*. Instead, you played twenty questions and BSed until the end, and switched at last possible second. So yes, your approach was sketchy, but almost everything you do is sketchy, so I take it wth a grain of trout seasoningYou're just mad it wasn't a tie. I was talking to AM, gave her time to switch, but she wasn't changing.
ValidYou're just mad it wasn't a tie. I was talking to AM, gave her time to switch, but she wasn't changing.
@Melchizedek I may reconsider the smite ban.so I take it wth a grain of trout seasoning
this is a good catch.But why did AM have to be the one to switch
I think others did a great job explaining why the timing was shady. I also didn’t like how genny announced who she was using her ability on while it was still night. I can’t really figure out what the logic was there. No matter what her affiliation is, genny had pretty much zero chance of being wolf or chaos killed last night, so no need to announce what she was doing.Why was it shady? Looked like legitimate, smart gameplay, saving herself.
Do you think wolves are going to walk into the thread with big signs on their foreheads saying "Hi I'm a wolf please lynch me?"
This game is all about the little details and subtleties.
But my apologies, I'll keep my D1 votes to RNG and make sure only to call people out for more obvious things in the future. Apparently that's what villagers do.
2 kills last night & 3 roster moves -- you sure it isn't a boost ability? Not sure that's always villageAlso if genny used her ability on me, not to give her ability away but if it's what I think it could be either affiliation but I think it's usually a village ability.
**************
You also dead and talking
*****************
In addition to dying, you are further punished by having to do twenty questions with AM.******************
True. But I'm saving the good stuff for the dead chat.
******************
wait......we have a dead chat?******************
True. But I'm saving the good stuff for the dead chat.
******************
******************
True. But I'm saving the good stuff for the dead chat.
******************
First rule of dead chat is don't talk about dead chatwait......we have a dead chat?
Do you think wolves are going to walk into the thread with big signs on their foreheads saying "Hi I'm a wolf please lynch me?"
This game is all about the little details and subtleties.
But my apologies, I'll keep my D1 votes to RNG and make sure only to call people out for more obvious things in the future. Apparently that's what villagers do.
Because AM was around and talking to me? No one else voting for me was saying anything to me the hour before lynch close. Except for tarty, who voted for me to tie it up.But why did AM have to be the one to switch: Villager logic: I am villager, other person may not be, I should vote them so village doesn't lose a villager. You wanting someone else to have switched instead of you just seems off. If you wanted to keep your vote you say something like: "hey guys, I like my current vote but am switching for self preservation, anyone else feeling this person. I think we should vote them for *insert reason here*. Instead, you played twenty questions and BSed until the end, and switched at last possible second. So yes, your approach was sketchy, but almost everything you do is sketchy, so I take it wth a grain of trout seasoning
Reading through, I see a ton based on how people feel about the posts thus far this game in relation to the posts of other games. I am still struck that it is day one. While there is useful info here, it does seem like an awful lot is info about prior games, so it is muddying the water for me.
Note to self, if LoTF is a wolf, look carefully back through day 1 for player comparisons.
Not a boost.2 kills last night & 3 roster moves -- you sure it isn't a boost ability? Not sure that's always village