Also, about the board scores-- there's been some bashing on the UA CoM because of the 15% fail rate that year for the boards, but I think you can look at it a few ways. I mean, sure the board score pass rate is important, but at some point, the success of the student depends on their individual effort. It's not necessarily a reflection of the quality of the education of that school, or that school's curriculum. It definitely can be, but not necessarily. From what Dr. Malan reportedly said, it seems that the students who weren't as "risky" did just fine, and those who struggled with their MCAT or whatever maybe didn't do as well.
At the same time, the board score pass rate is really one of the only measures we, as prospective students, have, besides locations of residency matches, to judge the "quality" of a school, so yeah it's important. But I just think that its importance should be put in perspective. What I've been hearing from students at the different med schools I've visited over the application cycle is that med school is what you put into it, and I can assume that to a reasonable degree, that holds true for one's performance on the boards as well.
At the same time, the board score pass rate is really one of the only measures we, as prospective students, have, besides locations of residency matches, to judge the "quality" of a school, so yeah it's important. But I just think that its importance should be put in perspective. What I've been hearing from students at the different med schools I've visited over the application cycle is that med school is what you put into it, and I can assume that to a reasonable degree, that holds true for one's performance on the boards as well.