I'm sure this has been asked somewhere on this thread in some form or another, so sorry if this is redundant...
If you have ZERO acceptances and are only on waitlists (which I am), your waitlist schools can tell that you have no acceptances. Therefore, writing a letter of intent to a school (albeit one that is very receptive to updates and LOIs) explicitly stating the phrase "if I am accepted, I will attend" will probably not do much, right? They already know since you have no acceptances that there is a high likelihood of you accepting. I've already sent multiple letters to this school saying it is my top choice/provided updates but never explicitly used the phrase "if I am accepted, I will attend." I just felt I was basically saying that when I said it was my first choice compounded with having no acceptances.
Recently, I've gotten a little nervous when I see other people get pulled off the WL after writing a letter of intent, but maybe in my case with no acceptances it is meaningless. Some might say you have nothing to lose to write another letter just clarifying your intent, but I don't want to come across as desperate and write a letter when it will have no weight. It really is my first choice school so it's not an empty statement, but maybe it's just unnecessary. Thoughts? I am leaning towards I should probably just be patient and see how the WL movement unfolds...