Just did the student showcase. The students were doing startups, one got 20,000$ for her research project, and they seemed pretty enthusiastic about the engineering aspect of medicine. Otherwise, Carle seems to be a pretty normal medical school, with people doing a lot of free clinic work and such.
Apparently, the engineering aspects of the Carle program are very simplified. They no longer study math, no numerical analysis or fluid dynamic modeling training. Everything is apparently "How to think about a problem like an engineer" instead of being trained to be an engineer. This is in contrast to the Texas A&M ENMED program, where there are Arduino microcontroller classes at least. However, Carle apparently has classes about business and patents, which ENMED also has. Overall I would say Carle appears more geared towards being a physician who works with industry engineers (accurately identifying room for improvement, and handing off ideas to industry), whereas Texas A&M ENMED is more geared towards being a physician-inventor (Working in preclinical trials, clinical trials, patent process, forming startups).
It seems that the relatively secluded Carle campus in Champaigne prevents a lot of interaction with clinical trials. In contrast, Texas A&M ENMED is in the biggest medical complex in the world in Houston, so there are more clinical trials.
I got a better and more earnest response from these Carle students than I got from Texas A&M ENMED students. At ENMED, the students generally seemed to be in an engineering-medicine program for the credentials and engineering projects for their resume and future residency applications, and did not intend to be physician-innovators. At Carle, it seems that this goal of being a physician-innovator is more widespread.
Also, for some reason I was under the impression Carle was a 5 year program, I think MSAR said it was but I cannot tell. It's only 4 years, not 5.