- Joined
- Sep 30, 2009
- Messages
- 61
- Reaction score
- 0
Curious how many are in my boat 8 WL. What does anyone think my chances are? Which schools have best history of taking lots from WL?
A friend last year was 11/11! Downstate came through in July
Curious how many are in my boat 8 WL. What does anyone think my chances are? Which schools have best history of taking lots from WL?
Hey bud, I'm sitting on 8 waitlists as well. Weeee
Me too!!! For the people that have multiple acceptances after May 15th they can only hold 1 acceptance?
Curious how many are in my boat 8 WL. What does anyone think my chances are? Which schools have best history of taking lots from WL?
4 WL here, no acceptances... how are you guys handling your "interest level" at each school? Do you just tell each school that they are your top choice and you will definitely attend if offered a spot?
1 school out of those 4 is my top top choice, so I feel bad telling one of the other schools I will definitely attend if accepted. I would feel bad to be "lying" but I guess that is not really a lie since I do not have an acceptance at this point.
Do you think it is bad to tell schools you are WL at that you have no acceptances anywhere?
After April 1st they release that information to schools? Where did you hear that?
Congratulations!!!
You've made it. One acceptance is enough to know that your dreams will come true.
naw, probably not if u have upwards of 4 or 5 waitlists
Me too!!! For the people that have multiple acceptances after May 15th they can only hold 1 acceptance?
6 interviews /6 waitlists here... I just want to know by now.
I think that this week and next week should be big for movement, but I think schools will not officialy reject until June or maybe even July.
It is going to be so hard to be filling out AMCAS and secondaries whie waiting for some type of news in June / July.
Wow. Who has the bad social skills? Those that are on multiple waitlists or the guy who comes onto the thread to BASH people he hasn't even met? hmmm.... Get a life, Colonel. Try being nice to others.
Good luck everyone (including Colonel)...he/she's gonna need it....if he/she thinks that they can get by in life by being rude to those they haven't even met.
And, FYI: If a school thought that the applicant had bad social skills, they would reject him or her flat out, not waitlist them. Perhaps there are other reasons that someone would be on multiple waitlists. . . . think outside the box, Colonel. If you want to be a physician, you are going to need to start doing that.
well that just simply is incorrect. In some cases yes, but many many schools just don't do post interview rejects, they put people on waitlist instead.
Other reasons -? No, if you have multiple WL it clearly means your interview is holding you back
And relax, I'm just pointing out the truth, . - yes it hurts, but that doesn't mean you should avoid it - if anything, learn from it as it may help you folk out getting acceptances in teh future. dont mean to bash anyone, yall have gotten many interviews, so clearly your doing something right
Unless you served on the admissions committee and made the decision to waitlist applicants, you don't know the truth. It's true that sometimes the interview is holding back the applicant, but that does not necessarily mean that the applicant demonstrated poor social skills or even poor interview skills. There is a bunch of factors that are considered post-interview for a decision, not just the interview. You don't know about the decision process from the admissions committee's point of view and you don't know about the applicant's application.
your 100% right, no doubt. But thats the case if you have 1, 2 even 3 WL. If your getting more then that, there has to be common denominator. Its definitely feasible that a bunch of factors post interview hold you back from acceptance, but if this has happened many times...then it's unlikely your just getting unlucky - clearly there is something in your application OR interview that is causing multiple schools to stop from giving an outright acceptance
Either way, I still wish yall the best of luck - just speakin a bit of truth here
Where are you from? Your grammar is ridiculous. And, yes, there is obviously SOMETHING in the application that is holding the applicant back. That does NOT directly point to poor social skills. Unless you have read these applicant's portfolios, I suggest you not comment on them directly. Everyone has their own life struggles and experiences.... and, these glitches on applications do not necessarily mean that applicants are ill suited to become physicians. I'd venture to say that some are just unlucky...and end up on multiple WLs.
Anyway, why are you still reading this thread? Are YOU on multiple WLs?
you folk really must suck at interviews, or have weak social skills
you folk really must suck at interviews, or have weak social skills
Yeah I agree that Colonel was a little harsh and probably should have a little more sensitivity...but on the other hand what is the more likely situation, getting 8 WL due to bad interviewing skills or because of a poor application?
I mean if you get 8 interviews you probably have a pretty decent application...I only got 2 and I know why - applied late, not very good MCAT and GPA...but 8 interviews? Or actually I think he had 10, one was a rejection and one acceptance?
I mean it is MOST LIKELY that the interview didn't go well. Now this doesn't mean he has poor social skills. My bf is like the more socialable person and he is really personable but he like chokes up during interviews. He becomes like a zombie and gets too nervous. The fact is that an interview is no the same as hanging out with your friends...
I interviewed at some awesome schools (UCSF, UCSD, WashU, Sinai) and was waitlisted at all of them. At three of those schools I had interviewers tell me I would be a great fit for the school at the end of the interview. Well, when I received my decisions from them I was a little shocked. I contacted two of my interviewers who I got along really well with and inquired about this.
Both my interviewers told me the same thing. While my interview went really well and they thought I would be a great candidate for the school, my freshman year GPA came back to bite me in the butt come final decision making time. At these tier 1 schools, where other candidates have literally no blemishes, it's hard to stand out. So even though I had a lackluster GPA when I began college, I rocked hard the sciences after changing majors and my focus, which is what initially made them interested enough in me to invite me for an interview (among my other cool ECs/MCAT). It's this blemish that I know is keeping me out, but I was told to sit tight as these schools are just waiting to see how many of their stellar candidates accept their offer. Everyone won't, so after next week, my turn will come along.
I'm quite optimistic. This is just my story, but just trying to show that it's not just the interview that can hold an applicant back, even with multiple interviews and waitlists.
This happened to me at one of my interviews. The guy basically told me I wouldn't get accepted because of my stats and I was like okay then why di you invite me for an interview if all you did was to invite me to yours school to tell me I wouldn't get in...kind of a waste of time.
This kind of pisses me off about medical school. What would be the point to invite a candidate to the interview if acing the interview didn't really help them receive an acceptance? I mean essentially even if you ace it you are wait listed...it's like you never had a shot to begin with which is kind of lame. I say this because I'm sure you were super nervous about the interviews, spent a lot of time and money, you get there and do awesome but then it's like they still look at your initial flaw.
This happened to me at one of my interviews. The guy basically told me I wouldn't get accepted because of my stats and I was like okay then why di you invite me for an interview if all you did was to invite me to yours school to tell me I wouldn't get in...kind of a waste of time.
In the end I know that the admission's committee looks at your entire application + interview to reach a decision. If you had a rough start in school, the interview should give you opportunity to explain that so they can look past it.
Anyways it's not just the top tier schools that do this, I think every school does this. Because honestly how much can they really learn about you from 30min-1hour?
It's okay though, the odds are with you if you have 3+ wait lists!
I interviewed at some awesome schools (UCSF, UCSD, WashU, Sinai) and was waitlisted at all of them. At three of those schools I had interviewers tell me I would be a great fit for the school at the end of the interview. Well, when I received my decisions from them I was a little shocked. I contacted two of my interviewers who I got along really well with and inquired about this.
Both my interviewers told me the same thing. While my interview went really well and they thought I would be a great candidate for the school, my freshman year GPA came back to bite me in the butt come final decision making time. At these tier 1 schools, where other candidates have literally no blemishes, it's hard to stand out. So even though I had a lackluster GPA when I began college, I rocked hard the sciences after changing majors and my focus, which is what initially made them interested enough in me to invite me for an interview (among my other cool ECs/MCAT). It's this blemish that I know is keeping me out, but I was told to sit tight as these schools are just waiting to see how many of their stellar candidates accept their offer. Everyone won't, so after next week, my turn will come along.
I'm quite optimistic. This is just my story, but just trying to show that it's not just the interview that can hold an applicant back, even with multiple interviews and waitlists.