- Joined
- Aug 5, 2019
- Messages
- 166
- Reaction score
- 317
I ask for evidence regarding your statement and you reply with an insult (says a lot).
And simple logic points to an M3 having a bit more insight into the process than an M1, simply by being in the game longer and by spending time with actual physicians who interview on rotations.
But again, this is all due to your failure to comprehend. I was never arguing about admissions standards. I was giving hope. But I forgot, a lot of people on here just like to claim "stat superiority" and put other people down.
Evidence regarding what exactly?
Actually, what the other folks were doing was trying to narrow in on what might be holding back those iis. And, stats were cast aside as irrelevant because hers are good--so the discussion actually had nothing to do with your "stat superiority". So they were trying to be helpful. Then you oddly offered that everyone on SDN only cares about stats and to disregard what they say and I guess believe in yourself? Sound advice.
Another failure in your "simple logic"--being an M3=more time around physicians=input into the process? How do you know an M2 here doesn't have adcom parents? Have you acquired more face time than them? Or an M1 has a long time adcom family friend? Or a premed has an adcom spouse? Or a 16 year old has 10 adcom members at every thanksgiving dinner?
Or of course you can disregard all the questions, because again--the points you are trying to make have nothing to do with the conversation before you jumped into it. Almost seems like you feel you have something to prove to yourself.