- Joined
- Jul 15, 2009
- Messages
- 40,063
- Reaction score
- 30,497
Meta
.
.
.
Meta
.
.
.
Meta
I am going to send you something via FB text that will make the following make sense...
UMBRELLA!
Meta
.
.
.
Meta
.
.
.
Meta
First off, I am ashamed of WZ.
Second, this is the part where you decide if you want to trust what I’ve said. Obviously, if we lynch Britz and she flips village, then you’d be right to question me. Fairly certain I’m not going to have that problem.
Ok so for people who seemed to miss this..."I'll think about it" means "Doh, I recognize what you are saying, I am a dolt and am no longer going to draw attention to you, and am going to still vote for someone else to keep discussion going."Yeah but I think I would still like to lynch dubz, though.
But interesting. I'll think about it.
Side note: it is generally not super duper wolfy to ask people to explain their votes. That is part of wolf hunting.In regards to my feelings about your Dubz vote:
Why are you voting for her? Did I miss something? Because I haven't seen you explain why you want to vote for her, despite asking everyone else to explain themselves.
This was after my exchange above, for the record.Don’t even get me started on this!
If you are saying what I think you are saying..
Lynch britzy
What was this unlynch? This was weird at the time. Mel and I had just been talking about how it was likely that wolves would be jumping on the Britzen vote, and then this randomly happened as part of a response to your statement that you were "worried" about the speed that she was picking up votes.That's fair.
unlynch DVMD
If Jil flips wolf I actually feel like this bumps both of these guys more village.If I’m picking up what she’s putting down, I think this is something we should definitely pursue. I also don’t think we should stop talking about other potentially sketchy players and behavior. Mel is definitely someone I have my eye on currently. I’m interested in people’s sketchy thoughts on wz’s, can’t say I noticed anything weird there, but sometimes other people see things I don’t.
So, you also didn't totally know what was going on.I musta missed an earlier post. What did Britzen do last night? Or, if you didn't reveal that, how strong of evidence is it?
🙄And I <mostly> disagree regarding your last statement about the more people talk.
Posting plenty of contributory posts helps - so talking a lot does help. But if the talking "a lot" is just inconsequential volume ... sure, that's going to hurt.
This was just weird to me in retrospect - you made a lot of statements how my earlier game play was consistent with my meta, then you did a 180 later on this evening, about the same posts. Hrm.That's fair. But, I take Pippy's point. Pippy likes to force multiple people to discuss, so she doesn't like runaway voting. It's pretty classic for her meta.
Doesn't make her village, by <any> stretch, but I don't think it's out of line with her play.
This was the post mentioned in my contingency vote; rings hollow to me especially because this was pretty late.I feel like you are being intentionally obtuse. If you are so innocent, what were you doing last night?
Be careful what you wish for.I really dislike the way Pippy was talking about this Britz lynch. I even went back and reread and it just doesn't sit right in any capacity. At the very least, I'd like to get her talking more.
I hope you know that I would literally never argue this.Are you arguing that we shouldn't point out unusual play?
No, because I don't think staying off of one vote "clears" me, either.And, you never answered: Are WZ and Cheezy also "cleared" by virtue of the same argument you made about yourself?
I also disagree that spatting at people like a feral is off my norm for getting lynch attention as a villager, but whatever.
Be careful what you wish for.
But also...really? I would be willing to bet cash money that I did more talking yesterday than anyone else.
This is like the 3rd "overly alarmist comment" mark I have for you. This, your comment about Cyndia (where'd those feels go, btw?), and your comment about the vote accumulation on Brit being worrisome.
I checked in this morning, saw all the likes on the drunken post I didn't remember making, and figured I should explain myself since it definitely was an out of character post for me.
And yes, today turned into an insane day thanks to more than double the number of trapped ferals showing up on an already overbooked surgery day, and someone leaving a pop-off valve closed on a dog which set our whole morning back. I'm beat so not going to be able to give you much tonight, but I'll be more chatty tomorrow night.
If only that were true....Hmmm... may be a good way to offset the cost of vet school...
This is basically my work schedule right now...no wonder I’m waking up so early (3:30am 2 days in a row!!!!!)am at school from 7:30am-11pm both tomorrow & Thursday.
Oh I read it. I typically read all the things. Just no time to really digest and respond until later.Yeah no one is going to read it anyways
So glad in retrospect that I spent like an hour of study time writing it on my phone lol
Gotta get to work, I'm gonna be late.......(Still in jammies, didn't eat.....oh boy***********
Modbandonment!
(Am I doing this right?)
I am going to send you something via FB text that will make the following make sense...
UMBRELLA!![]()
So, you also didn't totally know what was going on.
This was just weird to me in retrospect - you made a lot of statements how my earlier game play was consistent with my meta, then you did a 180 later on this evening, about the same posts. Hrm.
These are strange questions. Are you suggesting that there is a wolfy blocker?3 questions:
Who was blocked?
What was the wording of your blocked message?
Did someone “feel an odd tingling” last night?
Be careful what you wish for.
But also...really? I would be willing to bet cash money that I did more talking yesterday than anyone else.
This is like the 3rd "overly alarmist comment" mark I have for you. This, your comment about Cyndia (where'd those feels go, btw?), and your comment about the vote accumulation on Brit being worrisome.
I hope you know that I would literally never argue this.
But I would also hope that people think about what direction the unusual-ness leans, if that makes sense.
Hmmm not to sure about what is off exactly about this post, but it's giving me feels. Backtracking on something people thought was sketch... then saying I'll post more tomorrow.
****In mourning for DVMD/Sonic, ALL PLAYERS MAY PM during DAY 3 with the player listed above or below them in roster as stated in initial write up (Teep with LIS + ally
3 questions:
Who was blocked?
What was the wording of your blocked message?
Did someone “feel an odd tingling” last night?
I’m trying to establish a pattern.1) I was blocked.
2) Need more info if you want to get more info.
3) Not me.
Ok, but what I'm also saying is that a lot of you guys were reading those conversations after they already happened. So, duh - of course it was easy to see what genny was saying in context. But I was responding to her as things were happening. So I guess, you're welcome for me being obtuse and making her elaborate?Nope, but I knew something was going on, which you seemed to be saying you missed entirely.
Again, of course I didn't say this. I feel like you're taking my posts now and coming to these overly strong interpretations of what I actually said. It's like you're actively trying to spin them as sketchier than they are by making them into exaggerated absolutes.Is it that hard to understand? Or are you saying that once you do a read on someone that's it, you can't further evaluate them and all of their subsequent posts have to fall within that first read?
It's just you being irritated. And me being irritated, because the 2 things that set me off the most in this world are:I'm having trouble putting Pippy into a category. The overly argumentative responses coupled with kinda weak points makes me want to go wolf leaning, but... I dunno if that's just me being irritated or not.
Ok, but what I'm also saying is that a lot of you guys were reading those conversations after they already happened. So, duh - of course it was easy to see what genny was saying in context. But I was responding to her as things were happening. So I guess, you're welcome for me being obtuse and making her elaborate?
Do you see what I'm saying here -- by the time some of you guys started picking up on this stuff, it was when I was also picking up on it.
Again, of course I didn't say this. I feel like you're taking my posts now and coming to these overly strong interpretations of what I actually said. It's like you're actively trying to spin them as sketchier than they are by making them into exaggerated absolutes.
I’m trying to establish a pattern.
I'm curious as to why you think Teep's vote, for example, was less lazy than FS's. Both of them had like...one post yesterday.
He suggested this yesterday, at least once.These are strange questions. Are you suggesting that there is a wolfy blocker?
It's just you being irritated. And me being irritated, because the 2 things that set me off the most in this world are:
- lack of sleep
- feeling stupid
(Oh and I guess super obese cats. Because that is just mean.)
But yeah, when I have to explain the same stupid mistake about 20 times in the course of a couple hours, while fielding a lot of comments about how obvious it was and how you all clearly aren't as *****ic as I am, while at the same time I'm overtired and getting mentally stabbed by developmental anatomy, then yeah, I'm going to get grumpy about it. We can psychoanalyze my reactions to feelings of inadequacy at some point for funsies.
The thing that gets me about this, though, is that you are literally just coming off of a game where you wolfed with me. You saw the kinds of things I post in wolf chat. Would you say I am careful, or careless?
Because, I mean -- at the risk of screwing myself over in terms of future games, I'm confused about how you can look at the effort and overall attention I put into coordinating things last game, and come to the conclusion that big, highly visible mistakes like this would be something I would let happen as a wolf. I just wouldn't.
(Before someone makes a WIFOM comment...I know. But there is also such a thing as individual playing style and personal tendencies/habits, and people can't typically maintain a 180 on all of their normal behavioral patterns in any kind of consistent manner over such a short period of time. In anything, not just WW. If I could do that, I'd never be late to class or spend study time on a computer game again, but here we are.)
But ok, I am off my soapbox.
I'm curious as to why you think Teep's vote, for example, was less lazy than FS's. Both of them had like...one post yesterday.
I think wolf blocker is most likely. Didn't VMH say that it was her ability that had been stolen to use last night?He suggested this yesterday, at least once.
Considering that village block is dead and people are still getting blocked, I think it is a reasonable assumption that there is a wolf blocker.
Unless the ability thief that vmh mentioned is wolfy and can delay the use of what they steal (like, steal Crayola's block before she died, use it on a delay. Probably would be hard to establish a pattern on that anyways, though.)
Weird for Meats to point that out in the first place, btw. I don't feel like she is usually that free with sharing things like night results.
This is interesting. Why were you expecting her to have a reasonable defense? You said in your lynch vote post that it was obvious what genny was trying to get across, which would indicate you knew there were seer results.Yeah I did have a quiet day yesterday, I'll try and be better today.
I was pretty early on in the lynch, and had was expecting britzen to have some reasonable explanation/defense. That never happened so I stuck through on it. I'd rather vote to add more pressure than throw a single vote on someone and have it not pick up any steam.
This is interesting. Why were you expecting her to have a reasonable defense? You said in your lynch vote post that it was obvious what genny was trying to get across, which would indicate you knew there were seer results.
Why would you expect a seered wolf to have a reasonable defense?
Without knowing how Genny got her info at the time, it's always possible that she could have gotten bad info from a item, an PM she wanted to test the source of, etc.This is interesting. Why were you expecting her to have a reasonable defense? You said in your lynch vote post that it was obvious what genny was trying to get across, which would indicate you knew there were seer results.
Why would you expect a seered wolf to have a reasonable defense?
Without knowing how Genny got her info at the time, it's always possible that she could have gotten bad info from a item, an PM she wanted to test the source of, etc.
Having a reasonable defense from britzen would have made me think alot harder about who to believe. I think that I'm alot easier to move off of a vote earlier in a game when I'm still trying to sort out who I think that I can trust
Without knowing how Genny got her info at the time, it's always possible that she could have gotten bad info from a item, an PM she wanted to test the source of, etc.
Having a reasonable defense from britzen would have made me think alot harder about who to believe. I think that I'm alot easier to move off of a vote earlier in a game when I'm still trying to sort out who I think that I can trust
Yeah sorry I just do not buy this at all.Without knowing how Genny got her info at the time, it's always possible that she could have gotten bad info from a item, an PM she wanted to test the source of, etc.
Having a reasonable defense from britzen would have made me think alot harder about who to believe. I think that I'm alot easier to move off of a vote earlier in a game when I'm still trying to sort out who I think that I can trust
If Teep were to flip wolf, I want to lynch AM next. Can almost 100% guarantee she would also be a wolf.
Sure can. If Teep flips wolf, I will fully explain why. But in the meantime, it should suffice to say that i noticed you were ready to jump on that Britzen vote real fast yesterday, as I pointed out last night.Can you explain why?
Sure can. If Teep flips wolf, I will fully explain why. But in the meantime, it should suffice to say that i noticed you were ready to jump on that Britzen vote real fast yesterday, as I pointed out last night.
Yeah, and you pushing this right now is making me side eye you more, for reasons you should be aware of.Yeah, and I provided you with my reasoning at the time.
Does kaydubs usually put items in her games?