- Joined
- Apr 18, 2013
- Messages
- 71,065
- Reaction score
- 116,366
So if someone had seered rxelle it would have been like "Rxelle is a villager. Rxelle is a mouse who gives a piece of cheese to another animal every night." or something like that.
I haven't played before so I'm not sure, but I think a seer's results are usually "X is a -villager/wolf-. X is a - type of animal- who can -ability-." but I could be wrong and it could be different for every game.
So if someone had seered rxelle it would have been like "Rxelle is a villager. Rxelle is a mouse who gives a piece of cheese to another animal every night." or something like that.
Seering twice seems... Silly and a waste of resources. Which means... She could have seered BI once, seered kittyy, and seered SV88...She said she seered BI twice, which is a little odd this early in the game. How many nights have we had now?
Seering twice seems... Silly and a waste of resources. Which means... She could have seered BI once, seered kittyy, and seered SV88...
Seems plausible. Well all I can think is to trust out seer and switch my vote. unlynch kittyy lynch Haxxsorry omy way to work so going to be real busy for next few hours
I'm a frog and I can look into my lilypond for answers but the water is really muddy so I seer once for animal type and seer twice for their ability. It's dumb I have to do it twice but idk what animal types are good vs. bad
I meant, outwardly, to be a sheep. His seer powers don't show him what side an animal is on, only what animal they are. And we do not have any actual wolves, if I'm correct, so she could be a murderous sheep, rather than a literal wolf in sheep's clothing. Same goes for Haxx.Here's the thing though... If she is a wolf in sheep's clothing, she would appear, outwardly, to be a wolf. I'm sticking by my decision. Haxx comes next. If they both are sheep, I don't know what I'll do.
This whole sheepception thing is confusing me, without an edit function I'm pretty sure there will be some more typos in the future as I type what I'm thinking in the wrong order lolDo you mean she'd appear, outwardly, to be a sheep?
Here's the thing though... If she is a wolf in sheep's clothing, she would appear, outwardly, to be a wolf. I'm sticking by my decision. Haxx comes next. If they both are sheep, I don't know what I'll do.
I think that was just in reference to the villagers (food) and the wolves (pack)The very first post says that some of us are food animals and some are pack animals...do you think that could have been a hint that there could be multiple of the same role?
This whole sheepception thing is confusing me, without an edit function I'm pretty sure there will be some more typos in the future as I type what I'm thinking in the wrong order lol
That plus Haxx being the wolf still doesn't make sense to me. Waffling again. unlynch haxx lynch kittyyI meant, outwardly, to be a sheep. His seer powers don't show him what side an animal is on, only what animal they are. And we do not have any actual wolves, if I'm correct, so she could be a murderous sheep, rather than a literal wolf in sheep's clothing. Same goes for Haxx.
Well BI HAS to vote for kitty. She has no choice. Haxx obviously doesn't want to be lynched so he's going to vote for her.
I would like to hear some theories first because thinking about sheep makes my head hurt.
**lynch aggiegirl**
Because everyone else is doing that and I trust everyone. Been VERY busy at work today. Hopefully I get off before the lynch is over and can actually read reasoning...
Sorry guys for my inactivity today, just swamped at work!
Yad lla ginkrow neeb ytivitcani rof syug yrros
...ynnuf sleef deah ym osla
Mentor Public Service Announcement: Lynching yourself is considered very bad form.
Hey now, jerk, I *just* lynched myself and sacrificed myself over in the Lounge game because I saw it as the only way to give the villagers the best shot at victory.
So pfffft. There are times where lynching yourself is the best option you get.
Granted. Not many. And, well, LIS's Fourth Law of WW: Always vote to lynch someone who votes to lynch himself.
I posted without reading the message saying I had to post backwards. It was an oppsieKittyy - how could you post this without talking backwards? This was Day 2. Later in day 2:
I thought crystal's tripping made someone talk backwards for the entire day?
Oh, I get it now. I think I read through the day too fast.Willow, I just said that I couldn't waffle once I gave my lynch vote. I mentioned nothing about having to stick with it after the cycle was over.
Hey now, jerk, I *just* lynched myself and sacrificed myself over in the Lounge game because I saw it as the only way to give the villagers the best shot at victory.
So pfffft. There are times where lynching yourself is the best option you get.
Granted. Not many. And, well, LIS's Fourth Law of WW: Always vote to lynch someone who votes to lynch himself.
That depends on the mod and I doubt he would tell us what he would do. It's generally something the mods would enjoy but not necessarily something the players want as far as I can tell. He could kill both of them, could pick one, could come up with something else. I don't know.What happens if there is a tie for lynch? Like both haxx and kitty get equal votes?
I figured you just lynched yourself because you hate dealing with end game as a villager... so it was a way to put you out of the misery....
:troll:
which I find annoying.
:troll:
We're trying man, we really are.
Kinda like certain images that a certain somebody posts?
Anyway, back in the barnyard: Villagers, get it together and kill a wolf or three.
At this point if she seered you again she wouldn't be able to tell us the results in time for it to be useful, or might not be able to tell us at all if the wolves attack her and she isn't protected by the goat.What!!! Ugh!!! Seer me again! Y'all suck!
Kinda like certain images that a certain somebody posts?
Anyway, back in the barnyard: Villagers, get it together and kill a wolf or three.
At this point if she seered you again she wouldn't be able to tell us the results in time for it to be useful, or might not be able to tell us at all if the wolves attack her and she isn't protected by the goat.
We would have to spare you for two days. I think it would be a waste of potentially her last seer to use it on you, even if we did spare you today.Spare me for the day** god this is confusing lol
That is terrifyingIn honor of our sheep debate...look at what lovely creatures they are
Come on you dont need to rub it in@devyn , can we get a current count? tyty