I feel like you're kind of agreeing with me, but also simultaneously putting the responsibility for her sketchiness on me. Her decision to be cagey with explaining her decision is not on me. It is on her.
Because there is WIFOM that is more "fluffy" and WIFOM that is actually thinking about optimal wolf behavior.
This is the latter. I'm arguing that it would be really kinda dumb for me from a strategic decision standpoint to push villager lynches multiple days in a row because eventually people would start to ask questions. Like they are doing today.
When I wolf, I would be weighing expectations along with risk. And I am very careful about where/how/when I push people as a wolf. And in my mind, the gain of two villager lynches would not be worth that kind of destruction of villager trust at this stage, in this game.
Also, bold wolf does not mean non-beneficial.
And on this...did you miss the part where I was the first person to start questioning her, and was the first person on that lynch?
How was bryndi an easy lynch target at that point?
Like, you're making my own argument for me about why we should maybe be looking at people who jumped on that lynch later once the confusion was turned up to 11.
Which -- by the way -- was driven by Bryndi.