👍Exactly. This interview process that they use now is built to minimize bias (including political). They want common sense answers that can be backed up. If you have a reason for stating a certain position and you can explain it, they will not mark you down. But if you offer opinions that you think they want to hear (and subsequently can't properly explain why you took those positions), they will see through you and probably mark you down. In MMI, they're looking at the style as much as, if not more, than the substance of what you say. I came out of the interviews feeling I had not presented my arguments well, and that was what I was worried about. I was probably harder on myself than they were. However I didn't give a second thought to what my actual opinions on each scenario were, only how I delivered and backed them, because that's what they are looking at most.
I'll say it again. For those yet to interview, don't study, don't prepare and try to memorize a bunch of ethical scenarios or articles...just go in there relaxed, go with your intuition about each scenario, speak from the heart, and explain the basis of your reasoning everytime they ask you to give an opinion on a situation.
