2012-2013 Harvard Medical School Application Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Mine were alright. Each lasted about 50 minutes or so. Then again, most people who interview at Harvard feel pretty good about their interview.

On a side note, does anyone know how many Canadian students Harvard interview/accept?
 
The wait until March is killing me... this whole year went by so fast, but the next three weeks seem wayyyy too long. :scared:
 
Mine were alright. Each lasted about 50 minutes or so. Then again, most people who interview at Harvard feel pretty good about their interview.

On a side note, does anyone know how many Canadian students Harvard interview/accept?

I don't know about specifically Canadians but I read that they interviewed 34 internationals last year and accepted 10. The site was http://www.medicalschoolsinusa.com/medical-school-rankings/ I don't know how reputable it is though.
 
My Yale interview lasted three minutes before the professor said "I don't have any questions. . . oh, do you have questions?" I managed to drag it out to about fifteen minutes before he said, "Yeah, I just really don't have any more questions."

I sent emails to the admissions office requesting to provide feedback through a survey. Several times. I haven't gotten an email back.

It depends on if you're an unusually strong applicant or not? I always feel like my best interviews were the ones that lasted a long time. However, my shortest interview happened exactly like you said (one question about why this school. This is also a top 10 school, so it isn't even because I am a strong applicant for them and the interview process didn't matter or anything of the sort...) and resulted in an acceptance. Maybe when they are sure of you as an applicant they would like to recommend, they have less questions?
 
It all depends on the interviewer, whether he likes you, his influence and what he conveys to the admissions committee. Of course a strong application helps. Length of interview, I feel, is secondary for some schools. You can talk for an hour, but if the interviewer didn't write down much of what you say on his report, then I don't think the interview helped much.
 
I interviewed with the dean and it was pretty short... only like 15 minutes. Does this sound unusual?

If this was for HST, then that's completely normal. The dean meets with everyone for 10-15 minutes.
 

on the bright side, you will know in just over a week, or if you are around boston, it's not too late to ask for another interview though i dont recommend it considering it's the dean you're dissatisfied with
 
It all depends on the interviewer, whether he likes you, his influence and what he conveys to the admissions committee. Of course a strong application helps. Length of interview, I feel, is secondary for some schools. You can talk for an hour, but if the interviewer didn't write down much of what you say on his report, then I don't think the interview helped much.

I feel like if you're interviewing at HMS you have a pretty strong application..
 
Somehow, I feel as though the dean would be a more efficient interviewer and would be less likely to have some of the longer interviewers. I mean, he is the dean in addition to being a clinician and noted researcher.

In any case, it's hard to believe that the wait will be over in a little over a week. Haha- what are the chances of the decision coming out Friday, March 1st?
 
The funny thing is, HMS is the only US school that I got an interview at

I also interviewed here and got skipped over by most of the other 'top' schools I applied to. I think it's more about your application filling some niche they want more than it's about having top 1% numbers (which I definitely don't have). That said, I'm fully expecting a waitlist/rejection in a few weeks 😛
 
I also interviewed here and got skipped over by most of the other 'top' schools I applied to. I think it's more about your application filling some niche they want more than it's about having top 1% numbers (which I definitely don't have). That said, I'm fully expecting a waitlist in a few weeks 😛

a waitlist?! god you are so cocky 😡

🙂D)


harvard is also the only top school to give me an interview. wtf?
 
Last edited:
I also interviewed here and got skipped over by most of the other 'top' schools I applied to. I think it's more about your application filling some niche they want more than it's about having top 1% numbers (which I definitely don't have). That said, I'm fully expecting a waitlist/rejection in a few weeks 😛

Def. agree that it has more to do with filling the niche than the numbers- although I would be a fool to believe that they don't place heavy emphasis on numbers. I've heard there are a few students w 28/29 MCAT scores that attend HMS.
 
soooooo I have decided that I will stop visiting SDN when March hits. This is just too much 😱
 
FIVE DAYS GUYZ 😍😍

HMS I <3 YOU

okay I <3 basically every school and everything. But Harvard stood out in that it was the only school with a dorm named after another amazing medical school, and that's quite unique. So is early patient exposure. Actually HST is so unique in that they DON'T have early patient exposure.

😕

5 days. yikes.
 
If its like the last few years, it'll be next Tuesday, the 5th.

No way. It should be Monday March 4th. Trends: 2011: Thurs. March 3rd; 2012: Monday March 5th.

My money is Monday. In fact, let's not rule out this Friday March 1st.
 
No way. It should be Monday March 4th. Trends: 2011: Thurs. March 3rd; 2012: Monday March 5th.

My money is Monday. In fact, let's not rule out this Friday March 1st.

In that case I'll say Monday as well. If only cuz I don't want to be all mopey this weekend after the impending wait list/rejection.
 
I'm going to say Friday, because I'm hopelessly optimistic.

and, I want to believe that they want us to have the weekend to enjoy (or recover from) the news!
 
No way. It should be Monday March 4th. Trends: 2011: Thurs. March 3rd; 2012: Monday March 5th.

My money is Monday. In fact, let's not rule out this Friday March 1st.

I'm not sure I follow your logic with the past trends making you think Monday is the day - but I sure am hoping for some great news by then!
 
Friday would be way too early. I'm banking on Monday as well.
 
Stupid questions: is it by email or priority mail, and will the rejections and waitlists be given on the same day?
 
I'm not sure I follow your logic with the past trends making you think Monday is the day - but I sure am hoping for some great news by then!

Last year it was the first monday in March with the first of march being a thursday. The year before it was a thursday but the first day in march was a tuesday. This year's calendar looks a lot more like last years. Not solid logic just my best guess... or maybe just hopeful thinking.

I do think Friday is possible as well.
 
I'm going to say Friday, because I'm hopelessly optimistic.

and, I want to believe that they want us to have the weekend to enjoy (or recover from) the news!

Thats the same reason the applicants last year were expecting news before the weekend and everyone was freaking out on Friday March 2nd. But they had to wait until Monday. Reading that thread is kind of awesome actually, if only slightly sad.
 
They usually do the waitlisted/rejections the day after acceptances so if it's Friday for acceptance then having others wait the whole weekend to find out if they're rejected/waitlisted seems mean to me. That's why I'm leaning on Monday.....also using last years thread.
 
Instead of trying to predict when decisions will be released, which is kind of pointless, why don't you guys just call and ask?
 
I called, they said they "typically release decisions during the first two weeks in March." Soooo let the betting begin.

My money is on Tuesday.

Also -- are the emails sent out at the end of the day? Morning? All at once or over the day? Vary by timezone? Ahhhhhh. I hate this!
 
The emails are sent reverse alphabetically after your name is converted to binary code, all at 8am in the time zone listed in your preferred address. It's a Harvard thing

My money is on sometime between now and second-look weekend.

We are playing Price is Right rules. Closest without going over. Have a feeling you are gonna lose this one :/
 
The emails are sent reverse alphabetically after your name is converted to binary code, all at 8am in the time zone listed in your preferred address. It's a Harvard thing

My money is on sometime between now and second-look weekend.

If I remember correctly, emails were sent shortly after 5pm EST last year
 
From last year's thread... the e-mails were sent at 5:17, 5:30, and 5:53(EST). :naughty:

And I'm betting Tuesday.
 
loll this thread is getting pretty funnyy... hope they send out acceptances, waitlists, and rejections all on friday.. like they do for their undergrad acceptance decisions. but my money's on monday guys..
 
Last edited:
It all depends on the interviewer, whether he likes you, his influence and what he conveys to the admissions committee. Of course a strong application helps. Length of interview, I feel, is secondary for some schools. You can talk for an hour, but if the interviewer didn't write down much of what you say on his report, then I don't think the interview helped much.

I'll let the cat out of the bag about admissions... First of all, I am sorry to have misinformed you guys. Acceptances went out in early March last year, and they look like they'll come out in early March this year. By the way, we are soooooooo excited to have you guys. We will be starting a Facebook group soon. We all got to know each other over that, and we actually felt like we knew each other when revisit came. Further, you all know you get to meet people on the interview trail... some of those people will be there (if you interviewed at a lot of places on the Northeast. Anyway, on to my point... As I told many of you on the tour I gave you, there is variable value in your interviews. First of all, the the admissions committee is broken up into 4 subcommittees that represent geographical regions of the USA. International students are distributed by geography too (into the aforementioned subcommittees). Lastly, some schools are kind of shuffled around because we get a lot of applications from them (Berkeley is a prime example). Further, if you happend to go to "the college" (what alumni of Harvard undergrad call it), you will be divided by house (Thus, those of you in the Northeast aren't all competing against people who end up making up over 1/5 of the class). Now, as you know, two people interviewed you. It is likely that one person was on your committee and the other wasn't (but at least one was). Now that they've done their thing, they don't even have the opportunity to present you to their subcommittees... a third part who never met you does that. Then, they all scrutinize your application to hell and decide whether to send you to the main committee. Now, with only 25 people on the main committee and 100 people in subcommittees, it isn't unlikely that no one on the main committee knows you. Now, it's save to say that if you interviewed with Dr. Mayer, you have an advocate...if you impressed him. Otherwise, you likely have to rely on a complete application that has the things the committee is looking for. As we ALL realize, that can be a bit of a crapshoot. Many of my classmates only got into 1 top 10 school. That is what I call a crapshoot. Again, a huge congrats if you get in... and if you don't, it doesn't mean you weren't as "good" as the other people. It just works like that sometime. If you interviewed here, you'll definitely get in somewhere (I'm sure nearly all of you already have, congrats)... and that's the main point. I believe I can speak for the Class of 2016 (at HMS and everywhere else) when I say it is a pleasure have you all as colleagues in the field of medicine! -Cheers
 
I'll let the cat out of the bag about admissions... First of all, I am sorry to have misinformed you guys. Acceptances went out in early March last year, and they look like they'll come out in early March this year. By the way, we are soooooooo excited to have you guys. We will be starting a Facebook group soon. We all got to know each other over that, and we actually felt like we knew each other when revisit came. Further, you all know you get to meet people on the interview trail... some of those people will be there (if you interviewed at a lot of places on the Northeast. Anyway, on to my point... As I told many of you on the tour I gave you, there is variable value in your interviews. First of all, the the admissions committee is broken up into 4 subcommittees that represent geographical regions of the USA. International students are distributed by geography too (into the aforementioned subcommittees). Lastly, some schools are kind of shuffled around because we get a lot of applications from them (Berkeley is a prime example). Further, if you happend to go to "the college" (what alumni of Harvard undergrad call it), you will be divided by house (Thus, those of you in the Northeast aren't all competing against people who end up making up over 1/5 of the class). Now, as you know, two people interviewed you. It is likely that one person was on your committee and the other wasn't (but at least one was). Now that they've done their thing, they don't even have the opportunity to present you to their subcommittees... a third part who never met you does that. Then, they all scrutinize your application to hell and decide whether to send you to the main committee. Now, with only 25 people on the main committee and 100 people in subcommittees, it isn't unlikely that no one on the main committee knows you. Now, it's save to say that if you interviewed with Dr. Mayer, you have an advocate...if you impressed him. Otherwise, you likely have to rely on a complete application that has the things the committee is looking for. As we ALL realize, that can be a bit of a crapshoot. Many of my classmates only got into 1 top 10 school. That is what I call a crapshoot. Again, a huge congrats if you get in... and if you don't, it doesn't mean you weren't as "good" as the other people. It just works like that sometime. If you interviewed here, you'll definitely get in somewhere (I'm sure nearly all of you already have, congrats)... and that's the main point. I believe I can speak for the Class of 2016 (at HMS and everywhere else) when I say it is a pleasure have you all as colleagues in the field of medicine! -Cheers

So does this mean that one of my interviewers was in my geographic subcommittee, but neither is on the main committee? One of my interviewers said that he was my "advocate." What does that mean in terms of the general process? Or does that mean he just writes a recommendation and someone else takes it from there? Thanks so much for spillin' the deets!!
 
Also, my favorite interviewer (who was likely on my subcommittee) is also in the ORMA. Im sure you know 'um. Hint, hint...:naughty:
 
So does this mean that one of my interviewers was in my geographic subcommittee, but neither is on the main committee? One of my interviewers said that he was my "advocate." What does that mean in terms of the general process? Or does that mean he just writes a recommendation and someone else takes it from there? Thanks so much for spillin' the deets!!

This means there are any range of possibilities, but if you mean Dr. Saldana, I do think he's on the main committee. However, I'm not sure if it matters much. The person that interviewed you doesn't present you to a committee for protection from bias, but others still advocate. The thing is that everyone doesn't show up to every meeting (I suspect). This is why Dr. Mayer can be an advantage... He's at every meeting, and he's the tie-breaking vote. Anyway...don't fret. There's nothing you can do now but wait.
 
This means there are any range of possibilities, but if you mean Dr. Saldana, I do think he's on the main committee. However, I'm not sure if it matters much. The person that interviewed you doesn't present you to a committee for protection from bias, but others still advocate. The thing is that everyone doesn't show up to every meeting (I suspect). This is why Dr. Mayer can be an advantage... He's at every meeting, and he's the tie-breaking vote. Anyway...don't fret. There's nothing you can do now but wait.

Indeed! Thanks so much for the insight and we will wait and see. Now get some rest!
 
Hey Growinpains,

Do you know when next week decisions will begin to be sent out?
 
Also, my favorite interviewer (who was likely on my subcommittee) is also in the ORMA. Im sure you know 'um. Hint, hint...:naughty:

Dr. Saldana was awesome, my interview went well I thought. Then again, he was very conversational and I fear that may be the case with most interviews with him lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top