I think everyone just needs to calm down. Everyone is entitled to his or her own opinion, and attacking each other isn't going to change anyone's opinion.
True, but someone had to standup for the person that got an II and the reaction was "infuriating" to the other person. That's very disrespectful and attacks like that should not be tolerated by aspiring doctors. How would you feel if someone said you getting an II was infuriating based solely on the fact you were a URM with lower stats? That's exactly the kind of discrimination that URMs have always had to deal with.I think everyone just needs to calm down. Everyone is entitled to his or her own opinion, and attacking each other isn't going to change anyone's opinion.
I think the reaction had more to do with the fact that the person had yet to submit a secondary application, but I could be wrong. I don't really see why it matters, though, because the individual would have gotten an II soon after they submitted the secondary anyway.True, but someone had to standup for the person that got an II and the reaction was "infuriating" to the other person. That's very disrespectful and attacks like that should not be tolerated by aspiring doctors. How would you feel if someone said you getting an II was infuriating based solely on the fact you were a URM with lower stats? That's exactly the kind of discrimination that URMs have always had to deal with.
I think this is an issue throughout the medical education system, not a single solitary stranger on the internet. Disadvantaged non-URM's receive very little breaks compared to their URM's counterparts.
@mjhhockey98 I don't think that's what it was. This person had expressed anger about URMs perceived "advantage." The argument has gotten out of hand, but these types of off the wall attacks of URMs is all to common in some of these threads.I think the reaction had more to do with the fact that the person had yet to submit a secondary application, but I could be wrong. I don't really see why it matters, though, because the individual would have gotten an II soon after they submitted the secondary anyway.
I think this is an issue throughout the medical education system, not a single solitary stranger on the internet. Disadvantaged non-URM's receive very little breaks compared to their URM's counterparts.
Does anyone know how often they rereview the people they put on hold?
7/3 here buddy! Who knows how they do it, I'm just glad I don't have a rejection yetI've been under review since 7/7, they must not be looking at these apps sequentially
I don't know how much I believe that because right under the "under review" status, it states that this can include on hold time comparing to other applications. In order to compare they would have to have viewed your app..Is there any proof that U of M immediately puts someone on hold or II after reviewing? And that "under review" status means they haven't seen your app yet?
My status is "initial review complete." It was updated before they got my lettersIs there any proof that U of M immediately puts someone on hold or II after reviewing? And that "under review" status means they haven't seen your app yet?
Is that different than the "hold" status other people have received?My status is "initial review complete." It was updated before they got my letters
Yes, my status is Application Screening Complete.Is that different than the "hold" status other people have received?
If you read last years' thread, it seemed that Michigan did not reject immediately for those who were not gotten an interview after first review, there were people who were on hold then got a relatively late interviews notice (Sep) and early admission offer (Oct). I could be wrong though. But there is certainly hope. 🙂Yes, my status is Application Screening Complete.
I haven't checked last year's thread but does Michigan actually give rejections? If not then remaining Under Review might be a silent rejection after one's app has actually been looked at.
Right, I'm just wondering for people that aren't on hold but are still "under review" if Michigan ever gives out rejections early in the cycle.If you read last years' thread, it seemed that Michigan did not reject immediately for those who were not gotten an interview after first review, there were people who were on hold then got a relatively late interviews notice (Sep) and early admission offer (Oct). I could be wrong though. But there is certainly hope. 🙂
Seems like last year they didn't go out until January, but more "hold" statuses came out around December.Right, I'm just wondering for people that aren't on hold but are still "under review" if Michigan ever gives out rejections early in the cycle.
Sent from my neural implant using SDN Mobile
I petrified a little bit inside after I saw the the number of interview spots that were already given out this passing Monday when I finally had my primary verified and got their secondary. I am shocked as to you weren't one of the first to get interview from them considering your level of coolness. I wonder if UMich still does 10:10 Tue or 3:33 Friday...if so, maybe tomorrow?With their current pattern, spots are going fast. 🙁
My theory (not necessarily true):they don't seem as communicative this year!
I petrified a little bit inside after I saw the the number of interview spots that were already given out this passing Monday when I finally had my primary verified and got their secondary. I am shocked as to you weren't one of the first to get interview from them considering your level of coolness. I wonder if UMich still does 10:10 Tue or 3:33 Friday...if so, maybe tomorrow?
U Mich is being such a tease again. Got one of their recruitment emails this morning, encouraging me to apply.
Bro, I applied to you way back in May. You were literally the second school I entered into my primary. All I want is a little bit of love in return... seeing as I'm still in the "under review" status limbo.
I wish I applied early, however, for me that also means sacrificing the quality of everything from school finals to MCAT to primary app, so I chose to move forward in a slower but steadier pace.Awh, thank you. 😍 Congrats on that awesome MCAT! UMich better be sending you some love.
This process really makes me appreciate how important it is to apply early.
=OThe process this year may be slightly different this year, as Admissions Director Robert Ruiz is no longer at U of M. They have a interim director in the meantime, just announced to us new students coming on board next week.
Don't know, just know he resigned,no details forthcoming. He was as true blue as they come, had worked here for at least a decade if not longer. He will be greatly missed.Where did he go? He knew my name and face personally 🙁
From their twitter:Do y'all think "Applications Received" means complete, secondary + LoRs received...or just primary applications where the applicant has selected Michigan as a school.
It's interesting, because on MSAR, they give you "verified applications"...which I'm assuming means just primary applications.
Of 3,416 apps received, 1,175 are complete (secondary app + letters of recommendation). Updated tracker at http://umhealth.me/med-adm #GoBlueMed
From their twitter:
103.I thought last week when I checked the tracker it said 112 interviews given, so I'm thinking none went out today? Anyone else remember the tracker from last week?
Why is it deceiving?Oooh, thanks for that.
In this case, that's extremely deceiving lol if all you look at is the tracker, as well as the numbers that MSAR posts. -_-
112 interviews out of 1,175 applications vs. 3,416?Why is it deceiving?
112 interviews out of 1,175 applications vs. 3,416?
Yes, if things were not confusing enough without that fact... 🙂True, although not entirely deceiving since, as we've seen on the thread, UMich does offer some interviews before secondaries/LORs are submitted.
Exactly. According to last year's comment, UMich doesn't look at secondary and LOR in the first part of the cycle.True, although not entirely deceiving since, as we've seen on the thread, UMich does offer some interviews before secondaries/LORs are submitted.