1) Your a military officer before your a medical doctor which means officer duties, paper works, and from phone calls with current military doctors as you move up the chain of command the more paper work and administrative work you will be expected to perform even if you are a surgeon, more experience does not mean more surgery
Yes there is a ton of paperwork and administration. This is just bureaucracy and the military is the epitome of it. However, there is a ton of paperwork in medicine in general.
Also, the "you're a military officer before you're a medical doctor" line does not sit well with me. I am going to quote another SDN Navy veteran who put it much more eloquently than I can about the moral and ethical implications of such a statement: (emphasis is mine)
"This idea far worse than the other meaningless platitudes repeated by those who lack the critical thinking ability to understand the ethical complexities of being both a physician and a military officer.
If he is a "military officer first", it absolves the physician of any ethical responsibility for following orders. That's how we get military doctors doing bad things. These "military officers first" have betrayed their medical training by working in CIA secret prisons supporting torture, force-feeding patients in GTMO prior to malnutrition in accordance with instruction but violation of worldwide medical ethical standards and generally working against the interests of individual patients so they look good to their superiors.
Officer first is fundamentally a cowardly view of the role of the military physician. You are not one thing and then the other.
You are both at all times. Each choice you make has to balance that and you are the arbiter of that balance in each of those individual moments. More fundamentally, if you are a military officer first and a physician second, you aren't really a physician."
-
@Gastrapathy
2) Long payback schedule: 4 years medical school, 1 year internship, 3 year essentially required GMO (Navy docs I spoke with reported if you go to USU, you will do GMO), 3-5 year residence with or without fellowship if available, your residency adds on extra years to pay back so if you do 5 year residency you still owe 5 more years not 4 although you already paid back 3 with GMO = 15 - 19 year minimum commitment to military medicine with only time out of school counting towards retirement
Ah...no. The payback schedule is long but the math is flawed.
You incur a 7 year payback by going to USUHS. Residency TECHNICALLY adds payback time but the obligation from USUHS and residency are being paid off concurrently when you actually go into pay back years. In the majority of cases what ends up happening is that residency really does not add anything to one's obligation, unless you do neurosurgery or something ridiculously long. EDIT: Another way to think about it, after residency is completed which is the longer obligation, from school or from residency? The answer to that question is the number of years you have to pay back.
I'll do an example timeline for say family medicine.
4 years USUHS -> 1 year Intern (obligation neutral, 7 USUHS years payback) -> 3 year GMO (4 USUHS years payback) -> 2 year finish up family medicine residency (4 USUHS years payback, 2 years residency payback) -> 2 year utilization tour as an attending (2 USUHS years payback, 0 years residency payback) -> 2 year tour (Obligation done)
Total Time in Service: ~14 years (10 years as a practicing physician)
Hmmm...I suppose our end numbers are basically the same thing but your wording of residency literally adding time to obligation will not affect the bulk majority of students. For more details of obligations and payback visit the mil med forum and use the search bar.
3) Required GMO which means deployment and cook book medicine clearing people for deployment and flying with large amount of administrative work and required 50% fleet work: this is generally down as a general medical officer (essentially primary care), flight surgeon (primary care for pilots), or dive medical officer (primary care for aquatic related combat)
Eh...50% of new Navy medical graduates being sent off to GMOs is not everyone, so not really a "required" thing. Though I do agree with you on viewing GMOs as a positive experience. Plus the current trend is more and more competitive specialties are just training straight through so be a good medical student and you can avoid GMO.
8) Dying - the odds of this are no worse than driving on a snowy road but this is not to day that doctors do not die while on employment, to date a few doctors have died in the middle east and a few even died in Desert Storm which was a pretty one sided war
Uh...where are you getting this? To date I have heard from word of mouth that maybe 1 USUHS alumni died during duty out of the 4000-5000 graduates this school had? Even then I could not substantiate that number.
9) Skill atrophy is mentioned here and there. For one, you definitely will not get the exposure to that of a competitive civilian residency and some of the GMO work is pretty monotonous. You are also limiting you breadth of practice with generally healthy men and their family members if you have aspirations of leaving the military following our required pay back
Military residencies are good. They will not be Mass General or Mayo level, but they are good. The acuity, depending on where one is stationed after residency, can get pretty bad. That part I can agree with. Conversely, there is a silver lining of doing a GMO prior to residency since you pay your dues first and then settle into your specialty later.
Also, I have not heard veterans having trouble finding jobs after leaving the service personally or through the rants on SDN milmed.
10) Pay - a lot of people try and argue that in the long term it equals out but this is simply not true. One if you are in it for the money this definitely is not the place. Even with Obama Care you can still make a killing in what some call "lucrative" private practice with some surgeons easily making 500K a year. Your not going to make than 150K in the military even if you are a top notch surgeon.
In general, I agree with this statement, please don't join for the money. However, the take home pay of $4500/month plus vision, dental, health is nice while one is in medical school. I am literally making more money than the bulk if not all civilian residents out there right now. It is one of those take some reward now and less in the future versus suffer now (and I really do mean suffer) and major windfall (maybe) 8-10 years later.
Plus not everyone becomes a sexy hand brain heart spine butt eye surgeon that can make $1 million/year. Almost half of medical graduates end up in a primary care field and going to USUHS and winding up in primary care is a very sound financial move especially considering military primary care physicians makes the same if not more than their civilian counterparts plus no tuition debt.
11) Retirement - your 4 years of school do not count towards retirement but once you hit "24" years after you start school you will be credited with your 4 years in school towards your total retirement if it still exists in 24 years
You got the general idea but the specific numbers are wrong. Thanks to an act of Congress, the time spent in USUHS is not credited towards military retirement. For those not familiar, upon serving 20 years in the military you will receive a pension for life.
However, upon hitting 20 years of service following USUHS graduation, the 4 years will then be added on to the 20 years so you will receive 24 years worth of pension pay after separating from service.
12) The curriculum at USU is like many others except it does not target early clinical exposure until you start clerkship. You will also be moving every 5-10 weeks during your 2.5 years of internship across the country, pro to some and major con to those with family or spouse who has a career
Wrong, very very wrong. I was in the hospital talking to patients around week 2 of my MS1 year and training with simulated patients throughout my time. Granted I could not really DO anything with the patients but the exposure is definitely there.
There exists a system in place where you do not have to move every 5-10 weeks called homesteading where you basically stay in the same rotation hospital for about 3 months then rotate somewhere else, or stay. Really, but also kind of depends on location. For example, you pretty much won't be homesteading in Hawaii...but Dayton, OH? Sure. No one is really forcing you to move around ever 2 months. Plus this system really is in place for the first year of clerkships, after that it becomes one's own schedule.
The CON of having a spouse with a career is real but this is a con with the military in general. USUHS actually helps spouses get jobs and there is a really robust and well run Spouse's Club at USUHS that is very supportive and helpful for families.
13) Residency is not always merit base, it is also based on your military experience and leadership qualities. For example, resident applicants are ranked on a score with 30 being the maximum. If you do not complete a GMO tour the maximum amount of points you can achieve is 13 while the same applicant who completed a GMO can obtain a maximum score of 20. If you go above that, that means you are a current resident applying for another residency or something of that nature. Essentially, if you have not completed a GMO, you will be doing primary care
Sure...but I can argue that program directors in civilian residencies pretty much do the exact same thing because how else are you going to distinguish two candidates with a 260 Step 1 score and AOA honors? I talked with program directors in the Navy and they are given the power to assign points to boost your application and let you match if they like you. However, there is also the need to balance for the folks coming back from GMO tours and have paid their dues. Justice is the name of the game here.
For all other readers out there, just be the best medical student you can and see where the opportunities will take you as the years go on.