I am a little busy at the current moment, but I will answer this shortly ^_^
Well, I will go ahead an answer it now, because I'm just that much better than you and that's why I'm getting more interviews
😀 (Disclaimer: It's only ok for me to talk like this because we're very good friends, and he knows I'm TOTALLY kidding. Right? RIGHT? :/ ) Anyways...
How difficult was it to transition from lecture style in undergraduate to PBL at Bradenton?
Some adjustment, but I found it rather easy. I think it's hard sometimes for us LECOM students to separate the "med school transition" from the "lecture to PBL" transition. I think the "med school transition" is much harder and is where most of the adjustment difficulty comes in. The "PBL transition" is a bit more gradual, and, while it is an adjustment, it's not so bad. Especially if you're self-motivated, and either don't mind reading, or finding other resources (like Kaplan Lectures or whatever, if you prefer a A/V aide).
Remember that you start with Lecture during anatomy, just like what you're used to. Towards the end of anatomy, you start PBL, but you start VERY VERY slow, only picking a couple (likely mostly anatomy) based chapters to study. At least we did, because we had an anatomy test coming up...lol. Later, after anatomy is over, you pick up the pace, but by then you've had a couple weeks to get the kinks out and to figure out what it's all about. You efficiency also increases. See next question for more.
Are having only 3-4 big exams per PBL group semester extremely difficult to study for? Most lecture style DO schools test students weekly/bi-weekly on a fair amount of information. Does anyone at LECOM-B feel that taking such few exams and having to study upwards of 800 pages of medical literature may ultimately hurt their grade?
Difficult to study for? YES. But again, you're ramped up to full throttle. You first PBL test probably won't have more than 10 or 15 chapters on it (many anatomy) because you're still taking anatomy when you take it. So students tend to pick a lot of overlapping topics. Maybe some histo/embryo (also anatomy) and maybe some light Physiology. If you pick much (or arguably, any) Path or Pharm for your very first PBL test, you should be shot...lol.
Even by the end of 1st semester, you're still not up to 30-40 topics a case, most likely. At that point most groups were in the mid-20's. Now by 2nd semester you're breaking 30 pretty regularly, and by 2nd YEAR, you're breaking 40 for sure. But, remember there is a lot of repetition of chapters too. So although you're doing 40 chapters second year, you might only be doing 20 new ones. The other are ones you've done before (but probably don't remember very well, hahaha, that's why you're doing them again.)
Like nlax said, you have to trust that the program will cover all the material, because sometimes it seems like you're missing something...then eventually that case (or a similar case) will come in and fix it.
I think one of the main things people fail to understand about the PBL process is that you don't get a Case for every Disease in your Path book. For example, say there is Down's Syndrome case. You go and study all about Down's. You read everything you can get your hands on about Down's syndrome, and its associated complications. What is easily missed is that you're also supposed to be reading about ALL of the other Trisomy's (Edward's, Patau's, etc) and about other birth defects in general (fetal alcohol syndrome, etc).
So, you don't get a specific case for Patau's syndrome. So, if you don't read it, you don't learn it, and there's a hole in your medical knowledge. It WILL be on your test though, and it WILL be on your board exams, so you better know it or you'll be missing questions. Everyone has some holes. The question is where are they and how many. Obviously we do a good job a filling ours because of our board pass rate. I, for example, have extreme deficiencies in histology, embryology, some biochem (now, I know it better 1.5 years ago), and even some micro. Not because of the program, but because those are my own failings and I hate, hate, hate reading that stuff. Why should I, a budding psychiatrist know what the stages of MI heart damage look like at certain times under a microscope? If I'm looking at my patient's heart under a microscope, they're not my patient anymore but the pathologist's, and I think that material should be learned by budding pathologists, preferably in pathology residency. Can we learn the concept that there ARE changes, sure...but having to memorize them, or identify them on an exam is silly and a waste of time, IMO...but such is medical education (not a fault with LECOM, just med ed in general). Sorry, I digress...
Few exams? It doesn't feel like few exams. It actually felt just right to me. There's the 3 PBL exams, pretty evenly spaced throughout the year. Each one around 200 Q's, ~4h. Board pace basically (although you ramp up to this too.). On top of this you'll have Clinical Exam Written Exams, CE Practical Exams, OMM written exams, and OMM Practicals. It all adds up to where you'll be fairly busy.
Yes, the PBL exams are worth a lot of points...so don't bomb one too badly. You can still bomb one pretty badly and the next will save you though...although if you fail 1 PBL exam, don't expect to get an A in the course anymore.
One of the more frustrating things is that to participate in clubs/activites/etc you have to have a GPA > 3.0 That basically means that if you EVER get anything below a B, you're out of extracurriculars. It wasn't that difficult to get all B's in PBL, but if you get all B's in PBL and screw up on oooonnne little CE test and get a C in CE for the semester, your GPA is now 2.98 and will remain there most likely, unless you get an A in PBL (good luck, ha! but many people do it) or an A in your C class (more likely, but still lost 1 semester out of 4, at least).
Anyways, that was long winded. Hope it helps.