#Manator mode start#
For 1. I think your opinion always is important and will have a sort of uniqueness tbh. Even if its a mix of things already said by other people.
So like, there isnt a need to say things that are new, focus on sharing your perspective and what feel with more weight on your mind.
#Manator mode end#
2. Self-pres is NAI. Is the correct move regardless of aff. And doing things like voting your defender, or voting for someone you've been defending (tho wonda says they arent defending them for example, so thats stuff you should talk about! ) Are valid.
And like, do you think the votes on the Clem wagon are damning if both Matt and Wondalfy are village? In that scenario the wolves had like 3 wagons to choose from, and had no one really in danger, so they didnt care much, right.
Clem wagon votes I think could be more sus if one in Wonda/Matt is actually a wolf, because then there would be more motivation to vote Clem . Those type of stuff feels a little like too 'Elephant in the room' to me, and missing them while doing an analysis and being okay with giving the less importance in an analysis in two of the key slots to analyze is what weirded me . (Weirds ig is a nice way to say its the reason on why I think your analysis comes off more as wolfy agenda to me ehe)