I am having difficulty choosing between these two schools. I would choose UCI for price but I feel USC would give me an edge with obtaining academic surgical residencies in California (I'm not mstp). What are your guys' thoughts?
UCI (US news 43)
Pros
-Instate tuition ~31k (Saving 80k off tuition over 4 years)
-Staying home 3 of 4 years and continuing to commute (Saving anywhere between 40-70k over 4 years off cost of living)
-Familiarity with the OC (Went to UCI for undergrad, commuted 4 year
-my entire family lives in the OC
-New facilities
-Relaxed student body
Cons
-H/P/F MS1 and MS2
-mandatory lectures
-medical center is separate from the school (~8-10 miles)
-Smaller hospital when compared to LAC hospital, much less volume and diversity
-traditional curriculum
USC (US news 31)
Pros
-LAC Hospital and that amazing clinical exposure!
-P/F
-Non-mandatory lectures
-change of scenery (personal reason)
-more research funding
-higher USNWR ranking
-amazing alumni network
-seemingly very happy students
Cons
-expensive tuition (52k)
-not the greatest neighborhood (most likely would live in south pasadena so nbd)
-traffic
I could potentially save anywhere between 120-160k going to irvine upfront, which would translate to several hundred thousand dollars saved over the course of paying off the loans in a minimum of 10 years due to interest (according to aamc loan calculator). If money were not an issue, I would choose USC hands down.
However, I am compelled to go to UC Irvine because of two reasons: 1. I would save a lot of money and wouldn't have to pay nearly 500-600k over 10+ years like a second mortgage (This number is based off a 280k loan over four years with 6.8% and 7.9% interest rates going to USC) 2. If the SDN thinking holds true that any residencies can be obtained irregardless of the medical school that you attend, that would mean I should be able to get the same or similar residencies going to either school. Therefore, it would be more prudent to attend UCI.
I can't help feel that going to USC would make getting an academic surgical residency at a large academic center a lot easier based off more prestige, resources, and their alumni network. If I only wanted to do private practice, than these things wouldn't matter as much. Going to USC would give me a sense of security that I would be able to get those residencies that I want. Are the pro's for USC worth the money? Would they make getting an academic residency a lot easier? Or should I go to Irvine and take my chances at those same residencies? Am I overinflating the benefits of USC?
UCI (US news 43)
Pros
-Instate tuition ~31k (Saving 80k off tuition over 4 years)
-Staying home 3 of 4 years and continuing to commute (Saving anywhere between 40-70k over 4 years off cost of living)
-Familiarity with the OC (Went to UCI for undergrad, commuted 4 year
-my entire family lives in the OC
-New facilities
-Relaxed student body
Cons
-H/P/F MS1 and MS2
-mandatory lectures
-medical center is separate from the school (~8-10 miles)
-Smaller hospital when compared to LAC hospital, much less volume and diversity
-traditional curriculum
USC (US news 31)
Pros
-LAC Hospital and that amazing clinical exposure!
-P/F
-Non-mandatory lectures
-change of scenery (personal reason)
-more research funding
-higher USNWR ranking
-amazing alumni network
-seemingly very happy students
Cons
-expensive tuition (52k)
-not the greatest neighborhood (most likely would live in south pasadena so nbd)
-traffic
I could potentially save anywhere between 120-160k going to irvine upfront, which would translate to several hundred thousand dollars saved over the course of paying off the loans in a minimum of 10 years due to interest (according to aamc loan calculator). If money were not an issue, I would choose USC hands down.
However, I am compelled to go to UC Irvine because of two reasons: 1. I would save a lot of money and wouldn't have to pay nearly 500-600k over 10+ years like a second mortgage (This number is based off a 280k loan over four years with 6.8% and 7.9% interest rates going to USC) 2. If the SDN thinking holds true that any residencies can be obtained irregardless of the medical school that you attend, that would mean I should be able to get the same or similar residencies going to either school. Therefore, it would be more prudent to attend UCI.
I can't help feel that going to USC would make getting an academic surgical residency at a large academic center a lot easier based off more prestige, resources, and their alumni network. If I only wanted to do private practice, than these things wouldn't matter as much. Going to USC would give me a sense of security that I would be able to get those residencies that I want. Are the pro's for USC worth the money? Would they make getting an academic residency a lot easier? Or should I go to Irvine and take my chances at those same residencies? Am I overinflating the benefits of USC?
Last edited: