- Joined
- Oct 1, 2022
- Messages
- 169
- Reaction score
- 123
AM
I don't think she's made any alignment-indicative posts yet. I think the closest are these:
The first is the same thought I had so like-minds etc. The second seems like a nuanced thought but eh, oh second thought I think it's easily a wolfable thought to present. Light town read overall from the first post.
@Animal Midwife why the vote on me in particular? Or would any vote have met the requirements for lighting a match?
Genny
PSV
I haven't leaned one way or the other on any of her posts so far. Actually, perhaps a slight scum lean on her reaction to Santy's Zenge vote page 1. The asking him to explain it even though he already had.
I don't think she's made any alignment-indicative posts yet. I think the closest are these:
I think this comment is actually unpairing.
Ah okay. I wonder why Nate didn't ask about this vote.
The first is the same thought I had so like-minds etc. The second seems like a nuanced thought but eh, oh second thought I think it's easily a wolfable thought to present. Light town read overall from the first post.
@Animal Midwife why the vote on me in particular? Or would any vote have met the requirements for lighting a match?
Genny
Taking the claim at face value is an odd reaction, but I think town indicative as scum tend to keep their PR speculation in private.Are you really going to claim that this early?
I also think this post is great.How was it helpful if you're now pondering its meaning? If your question/AM's response was helpful in figuring out her alignment, wouldn't you have some interpretation rather than just more pondering? I feel like you're trying to look busy.
PSV
I haven't leaned one way or the other on any of her posts so far. Actually, perhaps a slight scum lean on her reaction to Santy's Zenge vote page 1. The asking him to explain it even though he already had.