- Joined
- Feb 14, 2007
- Messages
- 1,924
- Reaction score
- 12
Also some of the were packs were on V. That's all I got 🙁
soooo, when is lynch deadline? (unless we have plurality)
Sorry dvm, but ill call everyone to question at some point. What xaclty did you find that peejwas guilty of?
I'd still trust your info over nothing, I just don't understand it entirely haha.
Also, ambiguous roles will die for being ambiguous. We have to accept that happens sometimes. If a seer of some sort says they were guilty I think its better odds than letting them go and not knowing the limitations and strength of the seer (and potentially letting a wolf go that was correctly seered).
We do not know that answer. Only that she was found to be "guilty". From what it appears the role is a tracking role that only reveals "guilty" or "not guilty". I think it is better than nothing. If someone has more solid information than this, I will gladly change. But this is much better than any RNG, IMO. If PJ wants to clarify why she could have been possibly found to be "guilty", I will change (depending upon what it is). But for now, my vote stays.
Sorry dvm, but ill call everyone to question at some point. What xaclty did you find that peejwas guilty of?
I'd still trust your info over nothing, I just don't understand it entirely haha.
Also, ambiguous roles will die for being ambiguous. We have to accept that happens sometimes. If a seer of some sort says they were guilty I think its better odds than letting them go and not knowing the limitations and strength of the seer (and potentially letting a wolf go that was correctly seered).
Thank GOD I can talk normally. Sorry about the weird comments guys. I was given vamp blood which makes me talk like I'm on crack and has the lovely side effect of making me...um...want to make a pass at anyone who asked a question on the thread, so sorry about that.
DVMD: do you trust your source? I understand what you're saying, but just wanna make sure you trust whoever it is before I place my vote.
Peej, are you comfortable revealing your role to your group or someone in it via PM? It may be a good idea at this point.
Yes, it is has been confirmed that my source is who they claim to be.
I already did, LOL, I'm a V addict, each night I can break into a new players house to see if they have V, I get to find out if they are home or not, nothing too exciting
how can someone be confirmed so early in the game? we've only had one day/night
Oh also, I got an answer from trem. It was.....vague?
You mean about the bad thing that would happen?
Last night was Night 2.
I think she means your role name, not what your role does. A role name may help you. Your role is just ambiguous right now and could be wolfie or that of an ambiguous character.
I'm leaving for a bit.
Don't know when day closes but at this point I haven't been given anything substantial to change my vote.
I'll PM DVMD
Would someone else die if she was lynched? Like, the first/last person to vote for her or something?
Possibly not the best choice, in the interest of time. If voting closes before DVMD gets back, you're up Poop Creek (which borders the southern edge of Bon Temps, right?)
I PM'd BB
I wish you could pm me. Sigh.
Can't you pm me?
So PJ shared her(?) role with me. What she is saying fits with the character according to wiki and is pretty specific. If we think vampires are bad guys then we should probably hold on lynching her? Though her role sounds like she could be neutral. Kind of morally ambiguous in my opinion.
So PJ shared her(?) role with me. What she is saying fits with the character according to wiki and is pretty specific. If we think vampires are bad guys then we should probably hold on lynching her? Though her role sounds like she could be neutral. Kind of morally ambiguous in my opinion.
My problem is, I already know of some vampires that are villagers.
My problem is, I already know of some vampires that are villagers.
You can be sure about that at this point?