WW: Southern Vampires GAME THREAD

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
soooo, when is lynch deadline? (unless we have plurality)
 
Sorry dvm, but ill call everyone to question at some point. What xaclty did you find that peejwas guilty of?

I'd still trust your info over nothing, I just don't understand it entirely haha.

Also, ambiguous roles will die for being ambiguous. We have to accept that happens sometimes. If a seer of some sort says they were guilty I think its better odds than letting them go and not knowing the limitations and strength of the seer (and potentially letting a wolf go that was correctly seered).
 
Sorry dvm, but ill call everyone to question at some point. What xaclty did you find that peejwas guilty of?

I'd still trust your info over nothing, I just don't understand it entirely haha.

Also, ambiguous roles will die for being ambiguous. We have to accept that happens sometimes. If a seer of some sort says they were guilty I think its better odds than letting them go and not knowing the limitations and strength of the seer (and potentially letting a wolf go that was correctly seered).

We do not know that answer. Only that she was found to be "guilty". From what it appears the role is a tracking role that only reveals "guilty" or "not guilty". I think it is better than nothing. If someone has more solid information than this, I will gladly change. But this is much better than any RNG, IMO. If PJ wants to clarify why she could have been possibly found to be "guilty", I will change (depending upon what it is). But for now, my vote stays.

k
 
Sorry dvm, but ill call everyone to question at some point. What xaclty did you find that peejwas guilty of?

I'd still trust your info over nothing, I just don't understand it entirely haha.

Also, ambiguous roles will die for being ambiguous. We have to accept that happens sometimes. If a seer of some sort says they were guilty I think its better odds than letting them go and not knowing the limitations and strength of the seer (and potentially letting a wolf go that was correctly seered).

We won't know what "guilty" means until we test it and figure it out. We can't know if this is a full seer or a partial seer until we further find out, either by further investigation or by a lynch. Yes, it would suck if PJ is only ambiguous and a thief but it is better than using a RNG and potentially losing a seer, angel or protector.

Do what you wish. I am only the messenger.
 
Thank GOD I can talk normally. Sorry about the weird comments guys. I was given vamp blood which makes me talk like I'm on crack and has the lovely side effect of making me...um...want to make a pass at anyone who asked a question on the thread, so sorry about that.

DVMD: do you trust your source? I understand what you're saying, but just wanna make sure you trust whoever it is before I place my vote.
 
***********
I REEEEEEAAALLY wish I was playing... SOOOOOO BOOOOOOOORED! 😴😴😴😡😡😡
***********
 
Peej, are you comfortable revealing your role to your group or someone in it via PM? It may be a good idea at this point.
 
Thank GOD I can talk normally. Sorry about the weird comments guys. I was given vamp blood which makes me talk like I'm on crack and has the lovely side effect of making me...um...want to make a pass at anyone who asked a question on the thread, so sorry about that.

DVMD: do you trust your source? I understand what you're saying, but just wanna make sure you trust whoever it is before I place my vote.

Yes, it is has been confirmed that my source is who they claim to be.
 
Peej, are you comfortable revealing your role to your group or someone in it via PM? It may be a good idea at this point.

I already did, LOL, I'm a V addict, each night I can break into a new players house to see if they have V, I get to find out if they are home or not, nothing too exciting
 
I already did, LOL, I'm a V addict, each night I can break into a new players house to see if they have V, I get to find out if they are home or not, nothing too exciting

how can someone be confirmed so early in the game? we've only had one day/night

Last night was Night 2.

I think she means your role name, not what your role does. A role name may help you. Your role is just ambiguous right now and could be wolfie or that of an ambiguous character.
 
*****lynch pj****** pending further info.
 
Sorry. My best friend was in town for this morning before she heads back to vet school. 🙁

I KNEW zany was on V. I'm so smart. I don't THINK pj is a rattray? Actually I have no idea, but mostly weren't they suppliers? I know Jason was addicted with his girlfriend for a while?
 
So Peej can tell if someone went out at night to perform an action.
 
Would someone else die if she was lynched? Like, the first/last person to vote for her or something?
 
Peding further info/defense, I'm gonna go with lynch PJ for now.

And Abs, you're a genius. 😉
 
Last night was Night 2.

I think she means your role name, not what your role does. A role name may help you. Your role is just ambiguous right now and could be wolfie or that of an ambiguous character.

hmm I'm a little hesitant to do that, I'd consider just telling someone from my house
 
Going to try to quickly catch up then headed to a DVM/PhD barbecue at a professors house! Excited!
 
I'm leaving for a bit.

Don't know when day closes but at this point I haven't been given anything substantial to change my vote.

I'll PM DVMD

Possibly not the best choice, in the interest of time. If voting closes before DVMD gets back, you're up Poop Creek (which borders the southern edge of Bon Temps, right? :laugh: )
 
whens voting close? I'm tempted to wait until someone else from my house comes online to share my role, I really don't want to post it prematurely
 
Quick skim makes me think DVM's info is better than nothing. I'll Lynch Peej unless we get some better info. No idea when the deadline is. Pooey day at work and I'm bumming.
 
lynch PJ
something's better than nothing. sorry PJ...
 
So PJ shared her(?) role with me. What she is saying fits with the character according to wiki and is pretty specific. If we think vampires are bad guys then we should probably hold on lynching her? Though her role sounds like she could be neutral. Kind of morally ambiguous in my opinion.
 
I'll wait a little longer to cast my vote, not like my vote will sway the outcome or anything at this point anyway
 
So PJ shared her(?) role with me. What she is saying fits with the character according to wiki and is pretty specific. If we think vampires are bad guys then we should probably hold on lynching her? Though her role sounds like she could be neutral. Kind of morally ambiguous in my opinion.

Well that makes me not want to lynch her.

Unlynch PJ

But who should we lynch instead? I'm going to read back through a little bit to see if I can pick up on anything.
 
So PJ shared her(?) role with me. What she is saying fits with the character according to wiki and is pretty specific. If we think vampires are bad guys then we should probably hold on lynching her? Though her role sounds like she could be neutral. Kind of morally ambiguous in my opinion.

My problem is, I already know of some vampires that are villagers.
 
For now I guess I'll go ahead and Unlynch PJ RNG says Lynch cuitllaskg
 
Ugh, I hate neutral characters. Also I don't think we can generalize vampire=bad at this point in time.
 
CURRENT LYNCH RESULTS:

PJ Meowerton - 17
(DVMDream, bbeventer, SNS, DocE, Lissa, wldlfstdnt, wolfspeaker, cuit, nohika, trem, WTF, dyachei, Swings, hedgie, Zany, wildcatj, foxhunter)

Waffles: 2
 
Top