The only example of lynch proofing a wolf I can think of is the joker in my last game. And he wasn't lynch proof as much as there was a method to killing him that it took 12 rounds for people to fgure out.
No need to remind us all that this is clearly untrue for our games. I'll give Doc a pass because he just doesn't play here that frequently to know this is a common wolf role.
What I don't give him a pass on his continued insistence on foxie's innocence.
I am not sure if foxie is a wolf or not, but I remain highly skeptical of anyone who can be so sure of anything in these games unless they are a wolf. He admits he can't "see" her, but has been willing to accept her word all along. Just doesn't add up to me.
And his contention that only he can see perfectly doesn't add up as well. This game is filled with protectors and seers, and I don't think any of the roles are so flawless. It would be a poorly designed game if that were true.
And doc's continued resistance to see the obvious that there are conversions and/or un-seeable characters again doesn't add up. Because he has not "seen" a few people does not make us guilty. It is because we are not suspicious, and been helping win this game.
Doc is the one playing strangely and instead accuses me? What did I do the last few games he accuses me of? Voting twice to lynch LIS, WHICH HE DID and disagreeing that wolves knew his role. I mean being attacked twice is hardly strong evidence of anything, but he uses that to accuse me.
Pigheaded or wolf? I think he is starting to believe his own bullcrap. Yes, doc, yours stinks like everyone else.
And if you are just playing badly then I hope the wolves did kill you overnight, because you have become a liability to a villager victory.
)
