Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I was going to, but I think he said he’s covering inpatient for a couple days.
-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
WWho Let the Dogs Out? - Game Thread
Started by finnickthedog
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
I was going to, but I think he said he’s covering inpatient for a couple days.
No it’s not you. He’s posted like 5 times this whole game.
Edit: 32. So basically 5.
My reads:
Village
- I think m# is most likely village. I'm of the opinion sporty PM'd both of us because we were in the noob game and she was pocketing us. If that's what she was doing to me, stands to reason she would do that with him also
- Coop, pip, and m# have all hinted at being vanillager. Whether this is true or not, idk
- Cait coming across as village. Likely also pip. Same with MJ but I want to see more posts from him
- coop and barks have both been seered by dolphin. I am just hoping one wasn't seered incorrectly, that would suck
Skeptical/curious:
- beagle. some of the stuff yesterday just felt a bit off
- lamper. haven't seen enough posts to really know
Village
- I think m# is most likely village. I'm of the opinion sporty PM'd both of us because we were in the noob game and she was pocketing us. If that's what she was doing to me, stands to reason she would do that with him also
- Coop, pip, and m# have all hinted at being vanillager. Whether this is true or not, idk
- Cait coming across as village. Likely also pip. Same with MJ but I want to see more posts from him
- coop and barks have both been seered by dolphin. I am just hoping one wasn't seered incorrectly, that would suck
Skeptical/curious:
- beagle. some of the stuff yesterday just felt a bit off
- lamper. haven't seen enough posts to really know
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
He's pretty absent. I just read some of his posts at one point and agreed with them. Will likely need to revisit when he posts more
At the beginning, he seemed too space cadet-ish to be wolfy.
It's tough with him because it's hard for me to tell if he's inactive for real reasons, or for wolfy reasons.
He's basically jumped on the leading candidate every day... which could be lazy, could be busy, or could be wolfy af.
****************
Unofficial Day 6 Crickets/Grebes can actually track this one Lynch Tally
Lawper (1) - Matty Ice
1/13 Voting
Missing: MJ, Lawper, Coopah, Barkley, Caiter, Beagle, Allie, VMH, Pippy, ZigZag, Capri
************
Unofficial Day 6 Crickets/Grebes can actually track this one Lynch Tally
Lawper (1) - Matty Ice
1/13 Voting
Missing: MJ, Lawper, Coopah, Barkley, Caiter, Beagle, Allie, VMH, Pippy, ZigZag, Capri
************
Too many Lawpers (and even a Lamper and Lawyer) and not enough Lawpys or Pawpys 🙁 
Mainly because his inactivity is similar to his inactivity from the MMeat game and people were thinking that was sketch, which i had to defend from when i subbed for him.
Do you wanna be called lawpy?Too many Lawpers (and even a Lamper and Lawyer) and not enough Lawpys or Pawpys 🙁
My computer keeps autocorrecting and mostly I just find it amusing
But everyone did try to call me soggy in the last game and I also didn't really like that so I can understand
Just a heads up but you're tunneling a villager for a while now, and your concerns were already addressed a while ago in my response to vmh/meaty's question.
one does not choose their own nickname 😛Do you wanna be called lawpy?
My computer keeps autocorrecting and mostly I just find it amusing
K so I can stick with lamper? Lol
Do you wanna be called lawpy?
My computer keeps autocorrecting and mostly I just find it amusing
The Lawpy nickname helps avoid weird autocorrect issues and helps me find the posts that are addressing me more easily 😛
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
But Lawpy is well known 🙁
Pawpy is a good variant. It's like a mix of Pawsy and Pippy!
I'm reading Caits's posts and i'm not finding much sketchy in them. They just look reasonable to me but kinda wish she provided more thoughts.
I'm doing some process of elimination, and I think for now I have to
Lynch Bagel
😢
Lynch Bagel
😢
Who's bagel?
Too many Lawpers (and even a Lamper and Lawyer) and not enough Lawpys or Pawpys 🙁
Lamprey it is
I wanted to comb through this but it was also bothering me that nobody color coded paws or cray for the D1 tally
Day 1 Tally
Pippy (1) - Coopah
SportsPuppies (2) - stagg, AMSAR
Mel (1)- Crayola
Grebes (3)- Barks, beagle, Capri
MJ (0)-
Matty ice (0)-
AMSAR (4)- Skimble, SportsPuppies, allie, caiter
Skimble (0)-
mutts (6)- Lawper, MJ, shelter, Paws, Mel, MSUHope
Shelter (2)- Pippy, Dolphin
VMH (1)- Mutts
Paws (2)- VMH, Jboo
Barks (2)- Grebes, mypetmoose
Ziggy (1) - Ziggy
25/26 voting: missing Matt#
D2 Lynch Tally
Cray () -
Sporty (3) -Stagg, Paws, Pippy
Paws (0) -
shelter (4) - mpm, MJ, dolphin, cray
grebes (7) - Beagle, Coop, Barkley, Capri, lawper, Matt, AMSAR
AMSAR (6) - shelter, zigzag, Cait, allie, Sporty, jboo, Grebes
mpm (1) - vmh
Cait (1) - MSU
23/23
Day 3 Tally
Sporty (15) - Lawpy, dolphin, Stagg, capri, allie, paws, meats, mpm, barks, MJ, Beagle, Cait, Pippy, Coop, MSU
mpm () -
coop () -
Pippy () -
Cray (1) - Sporty
Lawpy (1) - Matt
17/20 Missing Cray, shelter, zigzag
Day 4 Lynch Tally
Coop (5) - mpm, MJ, zigzagoon, msu, Paws
mpm (8) - Lawp, matty ice, Coop, barks, allie, Beagle, meats, Cait
MJ () -
Allie (1) - pippy
paws (1) - dolph
Cray (1) - capri
16/17 voting
Missing: Cray
Day 5 Lynch Tally
Cray (6) - Barkley, Lawpy, Beagle, MJ, Caiter, Capri
Lawpy (1) - Matt
capri (3) - Coop, meats, allie
Paws (1) - zigzag
zigzag () -
MJ (1) - MSU
Coop (1)- Pippy
13/15
Missing: cray, paws
Anyway, from looking at this it seems that Matty has been stuck on Lawpy for several days now, beagle tends to vote middle to end of lynch candidates, and lawp tends to pick candidates early. Makes me slightly less suspicious of lawp's early jump on the sporty lynch.
Day 1 Tally
Pippy (1) - Coopah
SportsPuppies (2) - stagg, AMSAR
Mel (1)- Crayola
Grebes (3)- Barks, beagle, Capri
MJ (0)-
Matty ice (0)-
AMSAR (4)- Skimble, SportsPuppies, allie, caiter
Skimble (0)-
mutts (6)- Lawper, MJ, shelter, Paws, Mel, MSUHope
Shelter (2)- Pippy, Dolphin
VMH (1)- Mutts
Paws (2)- VMH, Jboo
Barks (2)- Grebes, mypetmoose
Ziggy (1) - Ziggy
25/26 voting: missing Matt#
D2 Lynch Tally
Cray () -
Sporty (3) -Stagg, Paws, Pippy
Paws (0) -
shelter (4) - mpm, MJ, dolphin, cray
grebes (7) - Beagle, Coop, Barkley, Capri, lawper, Matt, AMSAR
AMSAR (6) - shelter, zigzag, Cait, allie, Sporty, jboo, Grebes
mpm (1) - vmh
Cait (1) - MSU
23/23
Day 3 Tally
Sporty (15) - Lawpy, dolphin, Stagg, capri, allie, paws, meats, mpm, barks, MJ, Beagle, Cait, Pippy, Coop, MSU
mpm () -
coop () -
Pippy () -
Cray (1) - Sporty
Lawpy (1) - Matt
17/20 Missing Cray, shelter, zigzag
Day 4 Lynch Tally
Coop (5) - mpm, MJ, zigzagoon, msu, Paws
mpm (8) - Lawp, matty ice, Coop, barks, allie, Beagle, meats, Cait
MJ () -
Allie (1) - pippy
paws (1) - dolph
Cray (1) - capri
16/17 voting
Missing: Cray
Day 5 Lynch Tally
Cray (6) - Barkley, Lawpy, Beagle, MJ, Caiter, Capri
Lawpy (1) - Matt
capri (3) - Coop, meats, allie
Paws (1) - zigzag
zigzag () -
MJ (1) - MSU
Coop (1)- Pippy
13/15
Missing: cray, paws
Anyway, from looking at this it seems that Matty has been stuck on Lawpy for several days now, beagle tends to vote middle to end of lynch candidates, and lawp tends to pick candidates early. Makes me slightly less suspicious of lawp's early jump on the sporty lynch.
Is this related to beagle's posting at all (I recall you mentioning some questionable behavior from her the other day) or truly just from process of elimination?
If you actually look at the voting records you'll clearly see that I have not voted for the leading candidate every day. Unfortunately we haven't had a lot of good info to go off of recently and no one is really saying anything that sketches me out so I don't have much to contribute side from the exact same feels I had previously. Until something changes there is little else to say
Just something I'm mulling over here, but this seems to be a common read of caiter
Sorry. I should have clarified. You have voted for whoever was in the lead when you were on. 😛
I don't think Caiter is a wolf. It's for bad reasons that I almost definitely shouldn't be using, but oh well.
Does that make you suspicious?
On the flipside, her votes look pretty awful in retrospect (sorry if you're village, Caiter, but they do look kinda terrible haha)
...This is why wolves leave me alive even when I end up pushing a wolf lynch every once in a while.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I’m not sure whether lawp’s lack of defending himself makes me more or less sketched out lol.
I could get on a bagel lynch (that is fun!) though. I find her suspect the same way I find lawps suspect, as I mentioned above.
I have the same read, which means we've officially reached the point in the game where almost all of our reads are based on shiny stuff we dug up in the garbage in the back of our minds
Oops sorry, I did it on my phone.
There are a few things about lawp that have unsettled me, but it's hard to tell if it's just that he posts so differently from how he does in tatertot chat
I don't know. I feel like @Animal Midwife
Also @Animal Midwife is probably the most tagged dead player of this game because I apparently just can't stop mentioning her
She was. But people have been questioning if we have an unseerable wolf. So she can’t totally ruled out, and neither can Barkley. Idk if the mods would be evil enough to put an unseerable wolf in the same group as the seer though.
I never trust MJ, so I’m biased here. But I wolfed with him and dubz once, and if I remember correctly he was blocked on a no kill night, and some how still convinced people that wasn’t sketchy
so I have no read on him.
What is happening lol
Never question the lengths the mods will go just to be evil
I'm twisting in the wind. Don't mind me
Oh, believe me I know
I may be dumb as a wolf, but I definitely wouldn’t be dumb enough to try to defend one who was seered if I was also a wolf (@SportPonies you still owe me Elf over that 😛 ).
No I mean that is also why I'm not lynching him lol
So does unseerable mean they could show up as village? Or would they just not be able to tell? I assumed it was the latter, but maybe I'm wrong.
Well... **** lol
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Depends on how capricious your mod is
Oh it's both.
But process of elimination is what's pushing me over the edge of lynching my own manatee, which typically I would not do in their first independent outing, even though it's not exactly the most sound villager* strategy haha.
*Did work pretty well when @StayingPositive2017 and I were wolves, though 😏
Imma get real tin foily. @SkiOtter will be so proud
If there was an unseerable wolf in my group, I feel like it would most likely be coop though. Barkley said he was seered N2. He would have to either have been also converted the same night he was seered, or unseerable. But wouldn’t the wolves have killed dolphin N3 when Barkley found out who dolphin was? Wolves don’t want to keep the seer around
I think Barkley said Coop was seered N4 and found out N5? which was the night dolphin died. That timeline would make way more sense for a wolf to have found out the seer. Unless the wolves decided to keep the seer around for longer to frame someone else. And Barkley is the unseerable one.
Or the wolves knew it was someone else in my group after Skaggs wasn’t the seer and had decided to just work their way through it until they killed them.
A convert N2 would make sense with these EOD extra kills, since that was the only even they haven’t happened. But there’s nothing in the write up that would suggest it, so I’m not sure.
If there was an unseerable wolf in my group, I feel like it would most likely be coop though. Barkley said he was seered N2. He would have to either have been also converted the same night he was seered, or unseerable. But wouldn’t the wolves have killed dolphin N3 when Barkley found out who dolphin was? Wolves don’t want to keep the seer around
I think Barkley said Coop was seered N4 and found out N5? which was the night dolphin died. That timeline would make way more sense for a wolf to have found out the seer. Unless the wolves decided to keep the seer around for longer to frame someone else. And Barkley is the unseerable one.
Or the wolves knew it was someone else in my group after Skaggs wasn’t the seer and had decided to just work their way through it until they killed them.
A convert N2 would make sense with these EOD extra kills, since that was the only even they haven’t happened. But there’s nothing in the write up that would suggest it, so I’m not sure.
I actually prefer the former, because I feel that getting back an iffy result like "you were unable to seer this person" is enough of a red flag that it removes too much of the functionality of the wolf role.
