Sorry about that, It was probably just random lines embedded in my random verbose posts or maybe I confused something I typed up on in the post-bacc forum.
I really liked the school because I did the post-bacc (IMS/MMS) program here. They really gave me an opportunity when my choices were probably slim. Then when I came here to interview, I went around to talk to the faculty. All of them were incredibly friendly to me. I was a nobody peon, but some of them kept me for a long time just to talk to me. They made sure everything was great and wished me well.
I could make a list of basically all of our different faculty and just list the ways they've been really helpful and cool with me, but it would take too much time.
I guess it isn't really unique because a lot of med schools have great faculty, but I think the faculty here is super friendly and awesome. I really like the way the curriculum and notes are handled after comparing it with my other friends.
I think if you look at the school's record on who it accepts - we do have a few more non-traditional than a few other allopathic schools too. Service in the community is pretty important here, and it was one of the bigger things that I've done in the past (we have lots of free clinics, clubs, etc). The location was great for me, especially the rotation opportunity in Sacramento because my parents live there.
The PIL / IFM thing wasn't that important to me. I would have been happy in either one. Both have group work and lectures just in different ways. We share the same faculty, so we aren't learning anything different. Both score the same on Step 1. The LCME accreditation thing is forcing most medical schools to have a lot more of their class time as group work stuff, so IFM is slowly working towards a lot more group work. I know that year 1 and 2 this year have had more than what it used to.