Not intentionally trying to stress us out...but there is a difference between "we didn't get to these apps" and intentionally deferring them. Being intentionally deferred is a bad thing, and if they're holding us to review alongside future interviewees, we're the 'iffy' candidates. So, basically, what you're describing is exactly what I was hoping was NOT the case, because that is straight-up bad news.
I would think that if they simply didn't get to us, we would be at the top of the list for the next set of reviews, but that since there have been acceptances since the Oct 15 batch, but no decision for me (or, I'm assuming from their silence, the other deferrals)...it's looking more and more as if it was intentional 🙁 In that case, no news is finally not good news. It's "you're not good enough" news.