BoWWnty Hunting (2022) - Game Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Should we leave at least one vote on barks? If the bounty thing ends up faltering we've basically just done a no vote. Or its possible we still need a vote leader with the majority of bounties placed on that person (ie - the yeeting player is fulfilling the kill that the bountying players have targeted, or vice versa) ?
 
Should we leave at least one vote on barks? If the bounty thing ends up faltering we've basically just done a no vote. Or its possible we still need a vote leader with the majority of bounties placed on that person (ie - the yeeting player is fulfilling the kill that the bountying players have targeted, or vice versa) ?
I think it makes more sense to have the vote and bounties on different people. Because if there’s only one vote on the same person with all the bounties then did they would’ve won the vote anyway
 
Should we leave at least one vote on barks? If the bounty thing ends up faltering we've basically just done a no vote. Or its possible we still need a vote leader with the majority of bounties placed on that person (ie - the yeeting player is fulfilling the kill that the bountying players have targeted, or vice versa) ?
I think there’s definitely possible we will face ~consequences~ for not voting anyone, but considering this is an experimental game we were all expecting mass swift death to be a possibility in, I’m up for risking that in an effort to figure out bountying.
 
Okay what’s plan? I feel like so many people still haven’t bountied or voted. We still have 6 more people, plus possibly the person placing a vote in addition to their bounty. AM and shorty, are y’all going to re-vote or have you decided against it?
 
Okay what’s plan? I feel like so many people still haven’t bountied or voted. We still have 6 more people, plus possibly the person placing a vote in addition to their bounty. AM and shorty, are y’all going to re-vote or have you decided against it?
What’s your plan? Can we trust you? :thinking:
 
Okay what’s plan? I feel like so many people still haven’t bountied or voted. We still have 6 more people, plus possibly the person placing a vote in addition to their bounty. AM and shorty, are y’all going to re-vote or have you decided against it?
I don't know where I'd put my vote, tbh, so I am not intending to revote.
 
Is this the game we’re playing!? Wow.
 
I’m frozen. Idk what to do!?
 
DAY 3 (multiparts, no formatting cause sdn can’t handle it)

Today is brought to you by “bounties.” What are they? What do they do? Why should they be used?

Speaking of “B,” you know who doesn’t have to worry about bounties?

 
DAY 3 (part roster)


Roster: 8 players


1. @Animal Midwife
2. @cubsrule4e
3. @alleycat03
4. @genny
5. @Zenge142
6. @Viscernable
7. @WildZoo
17. @supershorty

Dirt Nap Dead
9. @mkg323
18. @Chaostrodon
13. @Barkley13

:ninja: : @JustPaws

7 newb sidecars
1. @weagle_weagle
2. @puppydogtor
3. @motheatenlysis
4. @Zeppelyn
5. @kdswg
6. @justafluff
7. @Dana_May_B


It is NOW Night 3. PMs please!
 
It looks like everyone voted or bountied, but the person didn’t get to double dip (or somebody else didn’t vote/bounty, so we’ll see if they ever come forward).
 
Why'd you decide on this?
It’s where the vote was already. I figured we’d test the weight of the bounties vs the votes. Bounties got force fam. Votes were irrelevant. #KnowledgeIsPower
 
It’s where the vote was already. I figured we’d test the weight of the bounties vs the votes. Bounties got force fam. Votes were irrelevant. #KnowledgeIsPower
Yeah. Not sure of it's just numbers or if bounties actually carry more weight or something.
 
Hey what’d you do that for??
I was testing a hypothesis, so I picked the person who I thought was least likely to have been shot at already. You’re being heavily village read and of the people I felt were the options for testing that theory, you seemed least likely to have been shot at already in a game where I don’t think there are wolves.

Didn’t confirm my hypothesis, for the record.
 
I was testing a hypothesis, so I picked the person who I thought was least likely to have been shot at already. You’re being heavily village read and of the people I felt were the options for testing that theory, you seemed least likely to have been shot at already in a game where I don’t think there are wolves.

Didn’t confirm my hypothesis, for the record.
You just used up my bulletproof vest. I’m curious to find out if everyone had 1 shot and 1 bullet proof vest or something else. I could only shoot on odd nights so it’s clear that some people could shoot on even nights too
 
You just used up my bulletproof vest. I’m curious to find out if everyone had 1 shot and 1 bullet proof vest or something else. I could only shoot on odd nights so it’s clear that some people could shoot on even nights too
That’s what I was trying to test out - I figured there were several people who had vests based on genny’s comment earlier on and the responses to it, but I wanted to decide if I thought it was everyone or if there was a group with more defensive options (vest and other things) vs offensive things (Chaos’ strongarm, maybe extra kills though that certainly hasn’t been reflected). So I chose from the group of people who hadn’t said anything in response to genny’s comment or to me and Dubz not saying what it was about.

cubs was another option but I figured he’d get shot at by other people.
 
Btw I shot barks on N1. So I was even more suspicious when she didn’t die. But now I’m assuming that most people/everyone has a bulletproof vest
 
Top