Accepted... Interviewed 10/21 and even thought my last name starts with a S, I found out early today.
Accepted... Interviewed 10/21 and even thought my last name starts with a S, I found out early today.
Ugh. MedPR = rejected.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using SDN Mobile
actually or are you just speculating?
Ugh. MedPR = rejected.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using SDN Mobile
Congrats on all the letters of acceptance everyone! My interview is Nov 9 and I'm getting nervous, not sure I even have a chance left if the class will already be full by then.
Curious, how many people interviewed with you guys on the interviews. I know they currently have three interview days a week. How many people do you think have they gone through thus far?
Once again Congrats!
Shoot, got my Alternate Email today. Just curious is there a difference between alternate and waitlist?
Speculating. Interviewed on 9/17 and haven't heard back despite decisions already going out to 9/20 and 9/21 people.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using SDN Mobile
Nevermind, not rejected. 😀Speculating. Interviewed on 9/17 and haven't heard back despite decisions already going out to 9/20 and 9/21 people.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using SDN Mobile
Nevermind, not rejected. 😀
Sent from my SGH-T999 using SDN Mobile
Same thing
Did you guys have an interview or were those sent in lieu of?
Wait-listed today. Everyone was nice enough but I found everything to be pretty boring including the city. My interviewer also thought that NP/PA/MD/DO all had the same abilities to run a clinic and prescribe medicine and made it a point of disagreement when one of my reasons is the ability to operate my own clinic. It's pretty lame when you don't even have an MD or DO in the room to interview you. I say good riddance. Already accepted elsewhere.
Best of luck to you others.
Wait-listed today. Everyone was nice enough but I found everything to be pretty boring including the city. My interviewer also thought that NP/PA/MD/DO all had the same abilities to run a clinic and prescribe medicine and made it a point of disagreement when one of my reasons is the ability to operate my own clinic. It's pretty lame when you don't even have an MD or DO in the room to interview you. I say good riddance. Already accepted elsewhere.
Best of luck to you others.
Wait-listed today. Everyone was nice enough but I found everything to be pretty boring including the city. My interviewer also thought that NP/PA/MD/DO all had the same abilities to run a clinic and prescribe medicine and made it a point of disagreement when one of my reasons is the ability to operate my own clinic. It's pretty lame when you don't even have an MD or DO in the room to interview you. I say good riddance. Already accepted elsewhere.
Best of luck to you others.
Ha. Sour grapes much? I volunteered in a clinic powered almost entirely by NPs and PAs - they did great work (including prescribing medicine). No, they would not perform surgery, but they did just about everything else. I'm sorry you're unhappy about the wait list, but there's no need to bring the rest of the thread down. This is a great school. Don't try to take away anyone's excitement about the possibilities here.
yeah,, don't you know? it's sort of blasphemous to criticize any school
I just wanted to express my annoyance with DMU's interview process. Yes, as an NP or PA you can do 'good things', which I've seen during my time volunteering and working in a hospital, but to compare their capabilities and autonomy to that of a licensed physician is incorrect.
I am aware that an NP can do a lot more than a PA, but a PA is limited to what he or she can do by the physician they work under. This is the point that my interviewer disagreed with me on, and also in a semi-confrontational tone. He would also 'zone out' when I was responding to the other interviewer's questions and then ask me the same question I was already asked. Just sloppy all-around, making for a very awkward experience.
I have attended several medical school interviews and not once have I had an interview where an actual MD or DO was not present. I see this as being a flaw in their admission's process, as a Ph.D in pharmacology does not exactly know what it's like to be a practicing physician.
DMU seems like an acceptable place to attend medical school, however I am simply not enthusiatic about it and was obviously not very happy with the interview day experience.
Nevermind, not rejected. 😀
Sent from my SGH-T999 using SDN Mobile
I just wanted to express my annoyance with DMU's interview process. Yes, as an NP or PA you can do 'good things', which I've seen during my time volunteering and working in a hospital, but to compare their capabilities and autonomy to that of a licensed physician is incorrect.
I am aware that an NP can do a lot more than a PA, but a PA is limited to what he or she can do by the physician they work under. This is the point that my interviewer disagreed with me on, and also in a semi-confrontational tone. He would also 'zone out' when I was responding to the other interviewer's questions and then ask me the same question I was already asked. Just sloppy all-around, making for a very awkward experience.
I have attended several medical school interviews and not once have I had an interview where an actual MD or DO was not present. I see this as being a flaw in their admission's process, as a Ph.D in pharmacology does not exactly know what it's like to be a practicing physician.
DMU seems like an acceptable place to attend medical school, however I am simply not enthusiatic about it and was obviously not very happy with the interview day experience.
I just wanted to express my annoyance with DMU's interview process. Yes, as an NP or PA you can do 'good things', which I've seen during my time volunteering and working in a hospital, but to compare their capabilities and autonomy to that of a licensed physician is incorrect.
I am aware that an NP can do a lot more than a PA, but a PA is limited to what he or she can do by the physician they work under. This is the point that my interviewer disagreed with me on, and also in a semi-confrontational tone. He would also 'zone out' when I was responding to the other interviewer's questions and then ask me the same question I was already asked. Just sloppy all-around, making for a very awkward experience.
I have attended several medical school interviews and not once have I had an interview where an actual MD or DO was not present. I see this as being a flaw in their admission's process, as a Ph.D in pharmacology does not exactly know what it's like to be a practicing physician.
DMU seems like an acceptable place to attend medical school, however I am simply not enthusiatic about it and was obviously not very happy with the interview day experience.
I just wanted to express my annoyance with DMU's interview process. Yes, as an NP or PA you can do 'good things', which I've seen during my time volunteering and working in a hospital, but to compare their capabilities and autonomy to that of a licensed physician is incorrect.
I am aware that an NP can do a lot more than a PA, but a PA is limited to what he or she can do by the physician they work under. This is the point that my interviewer disagreed with me on, and also in a semi-confrontational tone. He would also 'zone out' when I was responding to the other interviewer's questions and then ask me the same question I was already asked. Just sloppy all-around, making for a very awkward experience.
I have attended several medical school interviews and not once have I had an interview where an actual MD or DO was not present. I see this as being a flaw in their admission's process, as a Ph.D in pharmacology does not exactly know what it's like to be a practicing physician.
DMU seems like an acceptable place to attend medical school, however I am simply not enthusiatic about it and was obviously not very happy with the interview day experience.
I just wanted to express my annoyance with DMU's interview process. Yes, as an NP or PA you can do 'good things', which I've seen during my time volunteering and working in a hospital, but to compare their capabilities and autonomy to that of a licensed physician is incorrect.
I am aware that an NP can do a lot more than a PA, but a PA is limited to what he or she can do by the physician they work under. This is the point that my interviewer disagreed with me on, and also in a semi-confrontational tone. He would also 'zone out' when I was responding to the other interviewer's questions and then ask me the same question I was already asked. Just sloppy all-around, making for a very awkward experience.
I have attended several medical school interviews and not once have I had an interview where an actual MD or DO was not present. I see this as being a flaw in their admission's process, as a Ph.D in pharmacology does not exactly know what it's like to be a practicing physician.
DMU seems like an acceptable place to attend medical school, however I am simply not enthusiatic about it and was obviously not very happy with the interview day experience.
I had Dr. Spreadbury when I interviewed on Oct. 1st, but I never had any problems with him repeating others' questions. I would say, however, that he was probably the toughest interviewer and the one I'm most worried about. Oh well, it's out of my hands now!
Also, just because I really appreciated people posting their questions, here were mine:
Why DMU?
Why Osteopathy?
When did this whole idea of becoming a doctor begin?
What other schools have you applied to?
What do you like to do in your free time?
All the rest were either follow-up Q's or came straight from my application... Why did you decide to do: (item from application).
Overall the interview process was quite laid back, especially once my nerves settled. I forgot to check my watch when I got called in, but it was probably ~45 min long. If I had to give anyone advice, it really would just be the same advice everyone else has been giving: Relax, breath, and just be yourself. I got the feeling that my interviewers were mostly just trying to get a feel for what kind of person I was and whether or not I would be a good fit personality-wise for the school.
Personally, DMU is even more my top choice now than it was before the interview. The feel of the school is just awesome. I definitely got the impression, as many others have before me, that this school genuinely wants every one of their students to excel there. The changes they are making to the curriculum for 1st years makes a lot of sense from a student's point of view, in my opinion, and shows that they are continuing to improve their program. The next few weeks are going to be pretty excruciating waiting for a decision, I want to get in so badly.
What changes? Do you have a reference? I would like to read up on it before my interview. Anything you think now that you should have done?
Your guidance is much appreciated.
Thanks!
What changes? Do you have a reference? I would like to read up on it before my interview. Anything you think now that you should have done?
Your guidance is much appreciated.
Thanks!
What changes? Do you have a reference? I would like to read up on it before my interview. Anything you think now that you should have done?
Your guidance is much appreciated.
Thanks!
Dr. Spreadbury was my interviewer 9/20....he was really nice and asked the same questions...suggest going in with confidence but no arrogance...and be very conversational, elaborating on what really directed you to medicine...
Sent from my SGH-T959V using SDN Mobile
Did you also have Dr. O'Connell and Joan Magalang (student) in your interview? I wonder if they stay on the same interview team...
Getting nervous. You guys think the class is already full? Kind of feeling like Im interviewing for the wait list...
Getting nervous. You guys think the class is already full? Kind of feeling like Im interviewing for the wait list...
Getting nervous. You guys think the class is already full? Kind of feeling like Im interviewing for the wait list...