Yeah, I'd like to hear more on this as well.
I have issues with Matt's later actions, but going back to the self-yeet, it seems the community who responded have fallen into 3 camps:
1. The self yeet is sus on its own
2. The self yeet is fine, buy a lack of a defense of the self yeet is sus
3. It was a joke and not sus (this is my opinion)
Although I disagree with it, I'm fine with the people who find tbe self yeet sus, since it could have been a way to prevent having to vote someone with no evidence. I see the temptation of a wolve who would be afraid of having their previous actions analyzed to open with a self-yeet.
However, I can't follow the logic of people like
@Dinashadow who fall into my second camp. If you agree that the self yeet was a joke, why did you expect Matt to defend it? What action would you have expected him to take? Try to convince people to join a wagon to yeet himself?
Since I don't understand this reasoning, I really don't understand the one step further that Matt took to read this action as non-sus and justify a high spot of Dina on his list. Particularly since, as Samac pointed out, Matt has had almost no interaction with Dina before those 5 into posts to this game