The pros are very "me" specific and I don't think they necessarily make Western a better school. As a matter of fact, I think some of the pros for me are probably not great choices on the school's part although they benefited me personally. Because of our curriculum I was able to do three months straight of surgery rotations, and because it's distributive, I was able to do two of those three months at practices that I was interested in matching at for my internship. I will say, however, doing three months of surgery rotations was not really a wise decision when it came to NAVLE and actually being a doctor the following year and I probably should not have been allowed to do that. So, the opposing "con" to that would that I never did a cardio rotation, or ophtho, or derm, or neuro.
Another advantage is that because of the distributive model, for rotations that took place at hospitals in which I would be applying for match, I was able to spend a full month there and not only really get a feel for the practice but also they would get to know me. Is it feasible for students to get that done on a more traditional, shorter externship? Absolutely, and I'm sure may people on this forum have done just that. However, if you ask some of the internship programs that routinely take Western students one of the things they'll say is that they take so many because Western students will spend so much time there and they know what they're getting into a little bit better. The opposite is obviously true too sometimes, and most of my residency interviews included questions about how exactly Western worked and how well (or not) it had prepared me to be a doctor.
Another personal pro is the amount of time we get off in fourth year. I think we got three months total of vacation and we can organize it however we want. I took a few weeks off for NAVLE and then saved it all for the end and finished fourth year a couple months ahead of my classmates.
Another one that I'll say is that I think the surgical experience we got is superior to the students I'm teaching now. Note, I say the word "experience" and not "training." I can't speak for all vet schools, obviously. However, when I graduated, I had done probably 40 spays, 40 dog neuters, and innumerable cat neuters as well as couple other miscellaneous surgeries and that's not including the time I got on externships not directly affiliated with the school. Also, generally speaking, since I wasn't at a teaching hospital, I didn't have to fight with rotating interns, +/- specialty interns, +/- residents in order to scrub in and get a front row seat to surgery. My students now do half a spay in school and that's it. I think that surgery experience is pretty varied across vet schools though, so my experiences are probably different from many others on SDN.
What I really want to emphasize to sum this up is these are reasons the school worked out for me personally, but that does not mean they are good professional or career-related reasons and I absolutely do not think any of the above benefits are reasons to choose Western, and honestly some of them are reasons NOT to. I don't think that medicine and surgery should be the only required rotations for a vet student, and just have them fill in the blanks on their own. Also, the amount of debt you take on is a serious consideration and I just don't think it's reasonable that a school lacking a teaching hospital should be that much more expensive than a school that has a teaching hospital and also has a vast majority of specialists. When I was a student we didn't have a neurologist, an oncologist, a dermatologist... I don't know if that's changed now. I don't regret where I went to school because it got me where I needed to go. I was lucky enough to get my top choice for match two years in a row
However, I don't know that a school without a teaching hospital is an appropriate model to continue pursuing.
[edit] I realize some of these are not necessarily directly addressing the teaching hospital aspect -- sorry! I got a bit carried away.