I’m not sure that this account is active at all these days, but...
@VMCASSTAFF, maybe?
To be honest, I’m floored that it’s been two weeks now with absolutely no word from anyone, be it Western themselves, AAVMC, or VMCAS; not even so much as a "Hey, we're still working on it---hang tight!". When LMU was having similar issues a few years ago, I remember the response being nearly immediate (and LMU also had the excuse of it being one of their first application cycles... may have even been
the first... so it was an entirely new thing to them). Even if this is all simply a massive misinterpretation of the email, then they should come out and say that and clarify what was meant. As I like to say when it comes to writing/translating: if one person misunderstands what you're saying, the onus is most likely on the reader; if many people misunderstand, then you need to reevaluate precisely how you said it.
They cannot make you defer if you were accepted for this cycle and they certainly cannot backhandedly institute a "first come, first serve" method of building the class based on when deposits were sent in, provided that they were in by the deadline. If you paid and accepted your seat by April 15th, then they need to honor that acceptance. Period. They can
offer deferment, which schools have done in the past when this has happened, but they cannot
force it upon you, especially with no additional incentives (like, come on, at least refund deposits for those affected?), which is what the email seems to be implying. Ultimately, if you're in this situation and choose to forego deferment to the c/o 2024, then you should have a seat in the c/o 2023. That too many people accepted their offers for the supposed maximum class size is not the applicants' problem and you all should not be the ones being punished for that. You could not have possibly known that this was going to happen.
Again, hoping it's a miscommunication but I'm doubtful. I am starting to get very angry on your guys’ behalf.