I wouldn’t say anything happened. I was just re-evaluating in general.
. But at the end of looking through that it seemed like Lawpy was compatible with a number of people and was fairly Wolfy for the reasons I talked about above, regardless.
Oh this push back is not at all what I would have expected from village Lawpy. The tone shift is not subtle at all.
Explain warmly.
You had a sharper more abrupt tone that doesn’t match what I’ve seen from you the rest of the game or any game. Even when you’ve been pushed as a villager.
No the sharper tone has been there in past games when I’m defending. You can see Bowling, CYO 3 or many other games for comparison when I was in a bad spotlight over wagonomics or incorrect reads etc.
Why?
I reassessed after taking into account of Santy’s comments because Santy raised an important point about testing the strength of TR that I didn’t realize. So i’m not worried about #2 now
Yes? You were trying to get people to jump on them.
Speaking of softing though
Not really sure what my plan was with this. I just wanted to try it because it looked cool when Lumi did it and figured if anyone caught it, it wouldn’t be a big deal.
Wow
I wasn't pushing Fluff at all. Lawpy brought up the quotes in his catch up.
Hmm.
There’s a tendency for SDN regulars to place an undue focus on AM trying to read me as early as early D1 in any game we play together. I think this intensified after HZD from last year when people decided to ignore AM’s read to pursue my misyeet and realized they were horribly wrong. So since then, they’re using AM’s read very strongly to guide their own read on me
Probably because the assumption is a godread occurs pretty quickly.
Why?
Vote Spreadsheet
For your wagonomics pleasure. I'll probably just keep editing this post to update it (as long as I'm alive), so bookmark it for later.
- All the day's votes are listed in chronological order, and on the right side is a running vote count that shows what the vote count was after each vote.
Day 1 Votes
All Votes By Player
EOD Wagons
Elaborate more. Cause I think this argument is nonsense. Like, I feel you are doing a read in a vaccuum here
Because he townread me and was sheeping all of Santy votes but didn't sheep me when it came down to it. The vote on Nate is just not good.
I don't see why you shifted from True to Fluff? I was trying to build the wagon and you left in the middle of it. I'm not certain why that was the case,
He didnt sheep me voting on you. This argument doesnt stand up either
Regardless, not sheeping me upon request is scummy. It doesn't matter who or the context. uwu
Considering that Genny was following your vote, I felt like there was plenty of time and a good chance. There was someone I asked to vote true and they wouldn't because I was the only one voting there. Had you stayed on, I think there was a good chance of it going through.
Here's an alternative @potentialsheltervet
Who are you wolf reading, Lawper?
I was on True some good minutes and genny didnt switch. Like wowee look at the votecount at the end genny didnt even switch to True. And True could selfpres into Nate.
I just wanted to see where this went tbh.
I don't like that either 😡
Looking at the events of D1, i think wolves are within Truey, genny, Zenges, Nanooks +/- MKG
What is your rationale for putting me in your POE?
And expand on this pls
What is the distinction between village and town here? Lol
His insights are based on an expectation that AM would have a strong grasp of me in D1 and that my solving attempts are basically randomly throwing sus to see what sticks. Already discussed the problems with the former, and the latter is what I argued was unsubstantiated. My takes were nuanced and I explained my thought process at length so it’s not like it’s random or unjustified.
I voted my poe lol
Yes AM mentioned upper neutrals but it’s still a neutral read in D2.
