Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
We never conversed.
WWho Let the Dogs Out? - Game Thread
Started by finnickthedog
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
We never conversed.
It's stated by Jimble/Skilary to AMSAR on here as:
Which seemed to imply the two interacted last night
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
That could mean anything lol
Then the implication I bolded was off sonehow because that's what I thought when I read it
I don't think it's reachy or shady - plus, vmh was the first to mention the specificity of the comment, why didn't you say something to her?
I must've gotten misled because these posts came in the midst of other discussions about night results, PMs and interpretations based on what said on PMs, so seeing a statement like: "Oh, and you are welcome for last night, but whatever." led me to think that something happened last night and the two discussed.
I feel like Paws is trying to put minor shade out there on a bunch of targets to see what sticks
And I'm not sure why Skim is all worked up at AM.
If you acted on her last night, Jil, which it sounds like you did, then she wouldn't know it was you unless you told her today...and when you did, she unlynched you. I'm not sure why that is weird? And if she was wolfy, she wouldn't have known you had a role until you put it on the thread, so it wouldn't have played into a kill decision until tonight.
If you acted on her last night, Jil, which it sounds like you did, then she wouldn't know it was you unless you told her today...and when you did, she unlynched you. I'm not sure why that is weird? And if she was wolfy, she wouldn't have known you had a role until you put it on the thread, so it wouldn't have played into a kill decision until tonight.
Vmh's comment didnt ping me. After reread I can see your perspective on Lawpy's comment. Must have initially read it with different tone
Untrue. Just asking questions and trying to pay more attention, be able to search myself later to see what my initial feelings were. I was also trying to get caught up since I hadn't read since last night
I asked AM when she ever likes to pm D1. It was unrelated to you 🙄
No, the initial comment that you asked about was to me. Go back and read the chain of comments
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I already did. aM asked you if you wanted to pm. I asked AM when she ever wants to pm D1. It's. Not. About. You. She could have been asking anyone. I already told you that
I was speaking in general of past games, you were talking about specifics in past games that have nothing to do with why I’m lynching you now.
I’m dead anyway, and I just wanted to put it out there that it wasn’t me.
We did not talk, we are in different groups.
At no point did I say My lynch vote for her was related to me acting on her. My lynch vote for her is because when I asked her why she was voting for me, she said she had no reason. I don’t believe that is true, and the only reason to lie about it would be because she had wolfy reasons.
Lynch skimble because of the WTF rule, doth protest too much
She's literally dying tonight.
Day 1 Still Hungry Lunch Tally
Pippy Puppy (1) - Coopah
SportsPuppies (1) - stagg
Mel (2)- Capri, Crayola
Grebes (1)- Lawper (Pawpy)
MJ (1)-Pippy puppy
Matty ice (1)- Grebes
AMSAR (1)- Skimble
Skimble (1)- MJ
9/26 voting. FEED ME VOTES!!!
@Melchizedek you’re in the lead... for now.
do I smell waffle batter?
SportsPuppies (1) - stagg
Mel (2)- Capri, Crayola
Grebes (1)- Lawper (Pawpy)
MJ (1)-
Matty ice (1)- Grebes
AMSAR (1)- Skimble
Skimble (1)- MJ
9/26 voting. FEED ME VOTES!!!
@Melchizedek you’re in the lead... for now.
do I smell waffle batter?
If she’s already dying tonight though, why not just lynch her? This early on you’re more likely to lynch a villager than a wolf. So lynching skim would just mean losing one villager, not potentially two.
She said she was dying end of day I believe? So unless someone has an ability that can be used during the day (it’s been a while since I played, but I don’t remember Day abilities being common) that could save her, it seems to make more sense to lynch her.
I never buy the "I'm dying tonight" gambit because I've used that BS to stay alive one more cycle as a wolf more times than I can count. If she is dying tonight and flips village on lynch it still works out for us since it spares us the very likely chance that we'd just kill a villager with a shot in the dark day one lynch and she's claiming she would die anyway. We get more info tonight and have doubled our info toward getting a wolf tomorrow. Or I'm right and we get a wolf. It's win/win/win
I'll go with:
Unlynch greby
Lynch mutty
Just unpleasant feels from her posts
Unlynch greby
Lynch mutty
Just unpleasant feels from her posts
We're trying to lynch wolves though. Let's aim for one wolf and one village down if we can.
But if everyone just lynches skim, you lose all the info from a lynch. Like vote changes, waffles, interactions. Isn’t that like wasting a day?
Idk maybe what you propose is a better strategy and I’m just inexperienced and crazy.
Obviously we’re trying to lynch a wolf. But like MJ just said, we’re more likely to lose another villager in this lynch.
No one seems to have any real evidence and is just throwing shade at each other. Why not just have one villager die instead of two?
But it’s not like skim just came up with it, it was something multiple people gleaned from the way the write up was written. If skim was lying I would expect the villager that is described in it to speak up...
That raise the chances of us maybe hitting a villager to absolutely hitting one imo. I assume you're voting for her though because you're suspicious which, while I disagree, is a valid opinion.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I feel like AMSAR wouldn’t be dumb enough to try and lynch their night target, especially knowing that the write up indicated a delayed kill.
I can think of two recent games where I straight up lynched a wolf D1 and had greater success in the following days. I swear the longer it take for us to lynch a wolf the most random the reasoning gets. I don't believe two villagers have to die.
I'm inclined to side with Caiter and MJ. Does anyone else have experience with folks who have claimed they were going to die the following night?
I'm voting because I'm suspicious but I'm also saying that based on what we have gathered nothing of value will be lost since we are killing a dead person. If we miss (most likely scenario) and she dies at end of day, we are down two villagers. If we kill her, we are down one villager. Simple math if you're playing conservatively.
okie dokie
Not sure I agree with that. If Skim’s lying, we can just lynch her tomorrow.
Day 1 Still Hungry Lunch Tally
Pippy Puppy (1) - Coopah
SportsPuppies (1) - stagg
Mel (2)- Capri, Crayola
Grebes (0)-
MJ (1)-Pippy puppy
Matty ice (1)- Grebes
AMSAR (1)- Skimble
Skimble (1)- MJ
Muttmanager (1)- Lawper
9/26 voting. FEED ME VOTES!!!
@Melchizedek you’re in the lead... for now.
do I smell waffle batter?
SportsPuppies (1) - stagg
Mel (2)- Capri, Crayola
Grebes (0)-
MJ (1)-
Matty ice (1)- Grebes
AMSAR (1)- Skimble
Skimble (1)- MJ
Muttmanager (1)- Lawper
9/26 voting. FEED ME VOTES!!!
@Melchizedek you’re in the lead... for now.
do I smell waffle batter?
🙁 will call mutty as mutts i guess in this game but i refer to M935 as that. Matty, dirty 30 and others are a bit confusing for me.
The stats appear to be against that logic:
" Post #2 (ISO) » Mon May 07, 2012 9:35 am
Let's take your classic newbie setup, as an example.
7 town
2 scum
Let's say that the town decide to NL D1, but lynch every day from then, and scum also kills every night.
Day 2: 6 town, 2 scum. (25% chance of hitting scum)
Day 3: 4 town, 2 scum. (33% chance of hitting scum)
Now let's say town lynch D1:
D2: 5 town, 2 scum. (28.5% chance of hitting scum)
Day 3: 3 town, 2 scum. (40% chance of hitting scum)
As you can see, the town have a greater chance of hitting scum if they lynch anyone D1. There's some rule about that, it's in the wiki somewhere.
This is just from a statistical PoV, but lynching D1 is almost always better."
No-Lynch D1: A bad move? • Mafiascum.net
" Post #2 (ISO) » Mon May 07, 2012 9:35 am
Let's take your classic newbie setup, as an example.
7 town
2 scum
Let's say that the town decide to NL D1, but lynch every day from then, and scum also kills every night.
Day 2: 6 town, 2 scum. (25% chance of hitting scum)
Day 3: 4 town, 2 scum. (33% chance of hitting scum)
Now let's say town lynch D1:
D2: 5 town, 2 scum. (28.5% chance of hitting scum)
Day 3: 3 town, 2 scum. (40% chance of hitting scum)
As you can see, the town have a greater chance of hitting scum if they lynch anyone D1. There's some rule about that, it's in the wiki somewhere.
This is just from a statistical PoV, but lynching D1 is almost always better."
No-Lynch D1: A bad move? • Mafiascum.net
But you’re already going to be more likely to hit a villager. It’s not a maybe, it’s the most likely option here.
Unless she is their converter, in which case we literally handed them an opportunity
Why would you think there’s a chance of conversion this early?
You're missing the part where it's in the write up
Again, I doubt she's making it up, since it's heavily suggested in the write up. Basically the mods would have to be wolves for her to be making it up.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
That math applied to one character not being killed, it's a totally different scenario. It also completely neglects information gained via night cycles and analysis. The village should always lynch, but lynch wisely. I believe this to be the wisest choice, feel free to disagree.
IMO anyone who votes for Skim today is looking for an easy way to coast through today's lynch and make it more difficult to analyze their vote on D1 moving forward. We have to have village deaths to learn things, idk why today is any different.
Pffffff. Get outta here with your logic!
Lynch grebes
For now. I’d like an update on the PM situation
For now. I’d like an update on the PM situation
I know, it’s not like I already directly said that. But people usually like to ignore my posts 🙁
