trying to think of moral/ethical dilemmas. i can think of these two so far and i'm wondering if these would be considered as cheating in an academic setting. i hope not. anyway...
1. in one of my electrical engineering classes (that's my major) i was building a pseudo-random noise generator with a friend of mine. the report was due about a week after we finished it. i had a lot of other stuff to do later that week, so i just knocked it out real quick and turned it in early. even though i turned it in early, i spent a lot of time on it, and typed up a fantastic report. i thought the reports were supposed to be done individually when in reality my friend and i were supposed to work on it together. When i turned it in, my prof was confused when only my name was on it, but he said it wasn't a problem, and my friend just needed to turn in a separate report, but in order to make sure my friend wouldn't simply take info from my report (not that he would have), his report could not have any of the same analysis that my report had. It had to have all new info. Unfortunately, my report was very thorough, and my friend and i (and probably my prof) knew that he would get a terrible grade on his report. So, without my friend knowing, i talked to my prof, and he gave me the option of disregarding my previous report, completing a separate project with my friend, and the two of us completing a separate report together. I had already spent a LOT of time and effort on the first project, and i was confident that i would get an A on the report i turned in. Re-doing this project would mean forgoing an almost certain A, and duplicating my previous effort. However, my friend didn't do anything wrong in this case, so it's unfair to make him suffer the consequences of my actions. So, the ethical issue at stake here is whether i take the A or redo the project with my friend, allowing him a fair chance at a good grade. Being the awesome person that i am, of course i redid the project. Wow, that probably busted the 250 words by far, and it wasn't even well written. i guess i'll have to fix that
2. i was building a radar system with 4 other people. One of the people in the group was not pulling his weight, and it was really frustrating everyone else. Even after constant reminders that he needed to work harder, he just didn't do so, and the project was suffering. It came time for peer evaluations, and i was ready to rip this guy a new one, because if we all put forth the same effort for the same sub-par product, we all get bad grades. but if our profs were aware that this guy wasn't pulling his weight, the rest of our grades would be salvagable. However, he came up to me, and told me about some serious family issues he had been having, and in light of this new information, i was suddenly a lot more understanding of his lack of hard work. So, i was left with several options: 1. destroy this guy on the peer eval and let the profs deal with him. kind of a heartless approach. 2. tell the profs about his situation. bad choice, it was a personal issue and it wasn't my place to divulge that info. 3. convince the dude to tell the profs himself. somewhat conniving and manipulative, but i felt this was the best way to go.
ok, those were really long, sorry. i'll cut them down for sure. but are these usable, or should i keep brainstorming?