Also, on my interview day, someone specifically asked Dr. Morris (the dean of admissions) about curriculum reform at OHSU and lets just say it was the most vague answer ever.
And they're now trying to revamp the whole curriculum, to take the emphasis off of primary care and more onto specialties. Lots of hand waving, but that's what it sounds like.
I served on one of the curriculum reform committees at OHSU, so maybe I can be of some help here.
OHSU is revamping it's curriculum for many reasons, but a few big ones I've heard are: (1) to cut out redundancy, (2) to keep up with revamps at other medical schools, (3) to make the best use of the new medical school space, which will be set up mainly with circular tables so that students can interact, and (4) because there is a new dean of the medical school, and he has been very proactive about change.
The reason you probably received vague answers about the curriculum was probably because the process is still ongoing and there aren't any hard and fast answers yet. The process started with 6 specific committees (with student, PhD, and MD representatives), and they each tackled one area of curriculum reform (integration of basic/clinic science, student assessment, etc). These committees then sent their suggestions on to the larger steering group for curriculum reform.
So far, it looks like the curriculum is going to shift around a bit. It is very likely that lecture-based learning will be compressed to 18 months so that students can begin clerkships earlier. It is also very likely that clerkships will be punctuated by brief "intersessions" (a few days at the end of clerkships) that will allow students to discuss the basic science that is relevant to select cases they've seen. There will also likely be a mandatory scholarly project for students that can be based in basic science, clinical research, epi, etc. Aside from that, courses will probably be revamped so that the vast majority are organ-system based. This is largely in response to student feedback that indicated how much more students like the current MS2 year (organ system based) than the MS1 year (basic science-focused).
Other ideas are still being tossed around, but very little is certain at this point. All I can say is that OHSU has tried very hard to take what students want into consideration during this process. Honestly, I can say that very few of my classmates had big qualms with the curriculum when I was in my medical school years, but that the administration always made a big deal about student feedback. Some things are broken (like the policy to only offer formal tutoring to students who have failed an exam), but that is largely because the school pays the tutors, and they don't want to sessions to become so large that they aren't helping anyone. From what I understand, peer tutoring is open to everyone and is an option for those who don't qualify for formal help.
Anyway, if anyone has more specific questions, feel free to PM me. I don't want to toss out too much speculation on a public forum, but I did want to clarify a few things.