2013-2014 University of Colorado Application Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
considering some peole also got rejected today apparently, it's best we dont' assume anything. for all we know, these letters could be sent out in alphabetical order or some other system.
Plus lets not forget that we hear a lot of these stories through the grapevine. A "high wait list" could easily become a "rejection" in a game of telephone. We won't know until we get our letters. Kind of like 11 year-olds in Harry Potter... except depressing.
 
Plus lets not forget that we hear a lot of these stories through the grapevine. A "high wait list" could easily become a "rejection" in a game of telephone. We won't know until we get our letters. Kind of like 11 year-olds in Harry Potter... except depressing.

I'm sorry can you elaborate on that? I don't understand what you mean.
 
I'm sorry can you elaborate on that? I don't understand what you mean.

11 year olds in Harry Potter wait to see if they get a letter to attend Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. Just like we are waiting to get accepted… except it is looking bleak for us 🙁
 
I'm in the north Denver area and didn't get anything other than junk mail today.
 
I'm in Parker, didn't receive anything either. Show me some love, CU!
 
I don't feel good about this.. Ah well, I'm looking at the long run and another year of applications is peanuts compared to a career.
 
Has anyone's application status changed on the admissions website?
 
I don't feel good about this.. Ah well, I'm looking at the long run and another year of applications is peanuts compared to a career.
The fact that we didn't get a letter today doesn't mean anything. We just don't know until we get the ink on the paper. Another poster said earlier that they haven't made all the acceptances, so there might still be acceptance letters going out!
Has anyone's application status changed on the admissions website?
Just checked, no status change.
 
I just spoke with admissions this morning to make sure my address had been updated and the lady I spoke with said there was no specific order in which the letters were going out, at least not according to rank. She said they were being sent out in groups all the way until Friday of this week.
 
I just spoke with admissions this morning to make sure my address had been updated and the lady I spoke with said there was no specific order in which the letters were going out, at least not according to rank. She said they were being sent out in groups all the way until Friday of this week.
While this is reassuring, I still feel like it is setting me up for a debilitating heartbreak!
 
I just spoke with admissions this morning to make sure my address had been updated and the lady I spoke with said there was no specific order in which the letters were going out, at least not according to rank. She said they were being sent out in groups all the way until Friday of this week.

I called for the same reason yesterday and can confirm (he outright told me that some of the 'high' letters were still in processing)! Additionally, I had wondered how many tiers there were (like if there was a "highest", "high", and "low"), and he told me there were just the two lists for high and low.

That being said, somewhere in the past threads we've seen that there's generally ~80 people accepted off the wait list yearly. If that's the case, and last year ~600 were interviewed, with an initial 220-ish accepted (because they accepted 304), and an arbitrary estimate of 30% of applicants being rejected post-interview, that'd leave ~200 people on the wait list. If they split it 50/50, then there'd be ~100 people on the "high" list from which they presumably pull from, leaving about an 80% chance of eventual acceptance this cycle (if you're on that high list)

tl;dr: there's a lot of assumptions above, but dependent on how many outright rejections they gave out and how they split the distinctions for wait list, those of us on the list still have a pretty legitimate shot at acceptance!
 
Status online has now changed to "You have been placed on the High Alternate List. There is no numerical rank, yet your placement on this list means that you still have some chance of receiving an offer of acceptance during this admissions season."
 
My status also changed to high alternate list. I know there has been a lot of speculation about the breakdown of the waiting list, but has anyone actually asked how many students make the high alternate and the low alternate list. Also, has anyone been put on the low alternate list yet?
 
Also high alternate waitlist. Guess the fact that one of my interviewers made me cry wasn't a dealbreaker :laugh:
 
Same here (no change, no letter). Hope that doesn't mean that we are not on the high alternate list.
 
High alternate list! Guys if you haven't gotten a letter check your status online. That's how I found out.
 
My status just changed to high alternate list. I dont know how to feel about it though because everyone seems to be on it...
 
My status just changed to high alternate list. I dont know how to feel about it though because everyone seems to be on it...
Correction. Everyone + me. Now here is the real kicker... Do you all think that those who were notified earlier are placed higher on the "High Alternate List" than those notified later? I'd guess 'no' because they claim there is no numerical order but, hey, I'm biased. Plus CU has not been transparent with their process thus far. This question is bound to cause more anxiety (sorry in advance).
 
High alternate list via online portal...seems like too many people are on this list to be an actual "high priority" list.
 
My status just changed to high alternate list. I dont know how to feel about it though because everyone seems to be on it...

If it makes you feel better, my status was just changed to "low alternate". So not everyone is a high alternate 🙁.
 
i have both a high alternate and low alternate status update on 4/24/14? i'm just gonna go ahead and assume they meant the latter lol
 
Status update via online portal, apparently I am both "high" and "low" lol. Maybe I am at the borderline? Gonna have to call them first thing tomorrow morning.
 
i have both a high alternate and low alternate status update on 4/24/14? i'm just gonna go ahead and assume they meant the latter lol
So it's not just me. My first thought was that they made a mistake. Now I am thinking it means "middle alternate" lol. Still gonna call.
 
High alternate via portal

Was anyone accepted in the past few weeks?
 
I would assume it's probably about half and half in terms of what percentage is on the low or high alternate list. People have a tendency to report their wins more often then their loses.
 
My status changed as well, High Alternate List. I am elated, but still planning that out-of-state move, should CU not come through. Hope I don't have to make that drive! Good luck everyone, I hope we all find out sooner rather than later!
 
Got the correction over the phone this morning and I am on the low list. Good luck to those on the high list! And those on the low list, great job for making it this far!
 
Last edited:
Does anyone have any idea how the waitlist moves at CU? Tried calling to get some more info regarding my place on the 'high alternate' list and see if they could give me an idea on how it moved in the past but she wasn't biting. I always get nervous when I call anyway so I don't ask what I want to outright. If anyone has some insight please share!

P.S.
This is what this part of the alphabet would look like without Q and R.
 
I noticed a bunch of students on campus for second look day, and it made me reflect a bit back on my application experience. I browsed SDN frequently when I was applying, and after a couple years here at CU I wanted to mention some things I wish I knew when making my decision on which school to attend. To preface my comments- I don’t want this post to come off as disparaging, and I honestly don’t know how things are at most other medical schools. I hope to be helpful, because I feel that usually only the positive aspects of a school are presented on SDN (or from the admissions committee- for obvious reasons). There is plenty to like about CU, but here a few things that I would have liked to know before starting, and would encourage prospective students to enquire more about.

First, the school is in Aurora, NOT Denver. Aurora is likely the least desirable suburb of Denver, which leaves students the option of either living on campus, or commuting ½ hour (if you decide to live in Denver) each day to school. Maybe not a big deal to some, but either option gets tiresome after a couple years.

The first two years of school are taught by a huge number of unpaid professors associated with the campus. There are a couple full-time faculty members dispersed in each block, but the majority of lectures will be from people you only see once. It’s not uncommon to have 60+ different lecturers for each block, which means 60+ different teaching styles, leading to a frustratingly disorganized teaching system. I stopped watching lectures entirely during second year (and I know several of my classmates did as well), and started teaching myself using text books and board study resources. This was fine, but considering the amount of tuition I’m paying it became a bit frustrating. I’m not sure why exactly the curriculum is set up this way, but it’s likely based on money. Colorado is near the bottom of the nation in funding higher education, likely contributing to CU’s lack of full time employees. This is probably entirely unrelated, but we’ve lost a number of awesome faculty recently. The legendary Dr. Winn, the anatomy block director Robin Michaels, and the very popular pathology instructor Phil Boyer to name a few.

Lectures aren’t required, but there are quite a few “small group” sessions mixed in that they take attendance at. Groups usually contain 16-20 students, which in my opinion diminishes the effectiveness of this type of learning. Instead of small group discussions, these often turn into pimping sessions or just students going around in circles taking turns answering questions.

I could rant for days about the communication and inter-professional sessions, but I’ll just say that many afternoons are taken away from learning class material to attend these ever-changing pilot programs. The goals of these sessions are valid, but in practice (to me) they are a frustrating waste of time.

3rd year rotations are not set up well to explore specialties. This isn’t surprising, since CU has a bit of an obligation to produce primary care physicians. Several residents and 4th year students have commented on this as well, so it’s something to consider if you are hoping to enter a competitive field. Plenty of CU students still match into competitive specialties, just know that you will likely have to find outside opportunities on your own.

The dedicated step 1 study period/break between 2nd and 3rd year is 5 weeks. Most students spend 4 weeks studying, leaving only 1 week for break before starting 3rd year.

Again, these are a few of the things I haven’t like about CU. I’m sure various SDN posts and presentations from the admissions committee have filled you in on the good things CU has to offer. Anyways, send me a message if you have any specific questions, or if you’re interested in checking out the campus I’d be glad to show you around.
 
Account created on tuesday, first post today, and its a critique of the school conveniently days after the waitlist is posted…

Your trolling is obvious and you should feel bad about it.
 
Account created on tuesday, first post today, and its a critique of the school conveniently days after the waitlist is posted…

Your trolling is obvious and you should feel bad about it.
This appears way too detailed to be a troll. The post also discusses many things I've heard current students complain about. I know this site has a tendency to breed nervous nancys but this is legitimate information that everyone should consider before making a final decision (especially if they are lucky enough to choose between two or more schools).
 
Account created on tuesday, first post today, and its a critique of the school conveniently days after the waitlist is posted…

Your trolling is obvious and you should feel bad about it.
There is also such a thing as a person creating a 2nd account to protect their own anonymity if others may recognize their regular handle. Some of the points brought up also correlate to what I have heard from some current residents/former med students I know who attended here but still have an overall positive opinion of the school. No school is perfect, and it is worthwhile to be aware of areas of improvement!

Side note, received the waitlist letter in the mail today. Last name is in the first third of the alphabet, sent to my preferred mailing address. 🙂
 
If that's a troll post then it's the most well researched troll I've ever seen. No need to get paranoid guys.
 
Hmmm... I've also heard some negative stuff about CU from people who work in admissions. Regardless, the only reason I wanted to go there was because of the research track. But after five years of research, I'm OVER IT. Is there a way to withdraw an application before I get waitlisted or rejected?
 
Hmmm... I've also heard some negative stuff about CU from people who work in admissions. Regardless, the only reason I wanted to go there was because of the research track. But after five years of research, I'm OVER IT. Is there a way to withdraw an application before I get waitlisted or rejected?
I'm sure there is but don't you want to think about it a little longer? Have you not received a decision yet? You might still be considered for admission at this point based on what others on this thread are saying.
 
This appears way too detailed to be a troll. The post also discusses many things I've heard current students complain about. I know this site has a tendency to breed nervous nancys but this is legitimate information that everyone should consider before making a final decision (especially if they are lucky enough to choose between two or more schools).

I agree, the complaints seem pretty reasonable given the reality of the situation. The school is severely hampered by poor funding from Colorado which will contribute to limited administrative staff and less full time faculty. I come from a state school and we've been decimated by budget cuts as well which has lead to a lot of grief for me and apathy from them in the application process. Unfortunately it hurts the school in the long term...

This is in stark comparison to the private university I was at where the perspective is that the student is their future benefactor. The efforts the administration placed in getting you set up in a career after graduation and the support of the faculty and staff was night and day. As a result, almost everyone I know who attended the private institution has donated as alumni (minimally for some as they're still struggling financially). This is problematic of public universities in general and not specific to UC Denver. It really takes the leadership to put a huge push on getting $$$ from private enterprises and wealthy donors and putting a name on each brick in your quad area.

I am highly appreciative that a current student provides a list of dislikes. It's good to know because for some people criticisms listed will be a deal breaker but for others, they can go in with realistic expectations.

CAVEAT EMPTOR 🙂


I noticed a bunch of students on campus for second look day, and it made me reflect a bit back on my application experience. I browsed SDN frequently when I was applying, and after a couple years here at CU I wanted to mention some things I wish I knew when making my decision on which school to attend. To preface my comments- I don’t want this post to come off as disparaging, and I honestly don’t know how things are at most other medical schools. I hope to be helpful, because I feel that usually only the positive aspects of a school are presented on SDN (or from the admissions committee- for obvious reasons). There is plenty to like about CU, but here a few things that I would have liked to know before starting, and would encourage prospective students to enquire more about.

First, the school is in Aurora, NOT Denver. Aurora is likely the least desirable suburb of Denver, which leaves students the option of either living on campus, or commuting ½ hour (if you decide to live in Denver) each day to school. Maybe not a big deal to some, but either option gets tiresome after a couple years.

The first two years of school are taught by a huge number of unpaid professors associated with the campus. There are a couple full-time faculty members dispersed in each block, but the majority of lectures will be from people you only see once. It’s not uncommon to have 60+ different lecturers for each block, which means 60+ different teaching styles, leading to a frustratingly disorganized teaching system. I stopped watching lectures entirely during second year (and I know several of my classmates did as well), and started teaching myself using text books and board study resources. This was fine, but considering the amount of tuition I’m paying it became a bit frustrating. I’m not sure why exactly the curriculum is set up this way, but it’s likely based on money. Colorado is near the bottom of the nation in funding higher education, likely contributing to CU’s lack of full time employees. This is probably entirely unrelated, but we’ve lost a number of awesome faculty recently. The legendary Dr. Winn, the anatomy block director Robin Michaels, and the very popular pathology instructor Phil Boyer to name a few.

Lectures aren’t required, but there are quite a few “small group” sessions mixed in that they take attendance at. Groups usually contain 16-20 students, which in my opinion diminishes the effectiveness of this type of learning. Instead of small group discussions, these often turn into pimping sessions or just students going around in circles taking turns answering questions.

I could rant for days about the communication and inter-professional sessions, but I’ll just say that many afternoons are taken away from learning class material to attend these ever-changing pilot programs. The goals of these sessions are valid, but in practice (to me) they are a frustrating waste of time.

3rd year rotations are not set up well to explore specialties. This isn’t surprising, since CU has a bit of an obligation to produce primary care physicians. Several residents and 4th year students have commented on this as well, so it’s something to consider if you are hoping to enter a competitive field. Plenty of CU students still match into competitive specialties, just know that you will likely have to find outside opportunities on your own.

The dedicated step 1 study period/break between 2nd and 3rd year is 5 weeks. Most students spend 4 weeks studying, leaving only 1 week for break before starting 3rd year.

Again, these are a few of the things I haven’t like about CU. I’m sure various SDN posts and presentations from the admissions committee have filled you in on the good things CU has to offer. Anyways, send me a message if you have any specific questions, or if you’re interested in checking out the campus I’d be glad to show you around.

Is it possible to convince the SOM to increase the Step1 study period? My friends attend schools where they're given a longer period of time and every extra day helps!
 
I agree, the complaints seem pretty reasonable given the reality of the situation. The school is severely hampered by poor funding from Colorado which will contribute to limited administrative staff and less full time faculty. I come from a state school and we've been decimated by budget cuts as well which has lead to a lot of grief for me and apathy from them in the application process. Unfortunately it hurts the school in the long term...

This is in stark comparison to the private university I was at where the perspective is that the student is their future benefactor. The efforts the administration placed in getting you set up in a career after graduation and the support of the faculty and staff was night and day. As a result, almost everyone I know who attended the private institution has donated as alumni (minimally for some as they're still struggling financially). This is problematic of public universities in general and not specific to UC Denver. It really takes the leadership to put a huge push on getting $$$ from private enterprises and wealthy donors and putting a name on each brick in your quad area.

I am highly appreciative that a current student provides a list of dislikes. It's good to know because for some people criticisms listed will be a deal breaker but for others, they can go in with realistic expectations.

CAVEAT EMPTOR 🙂

Is it possible to convince the SOM to increase the Step1 study period? My friends attend schools where they're given a longer period of time and every extra day helps!

I think extending this study time would require substantially changing the curriculum/schedule immediately leading/following the break, as such, I wouldn't expect that change to happen quickly. My understanding, from speaking with current students (my friends just completed Step 1), is that you can schedule when you want to take the test, providing you with--at least a little--control on how much break and/or study time you get.

I am also appreciative of the current student's comments on some of the challenges at CU. I have heard some of these points from others as well, so I wouldn't assume it is a random new-user slamming the school to deter its selection. On that note, I am hopeful that prospective students receive acceptances from their dream schools and select them over CU, so that I may have a better chance at attending my dream school. : ) It's not disturbingly self-serving if I hope for their ultimate success elsewhere, right?
 
Here is a tiny bit of info. I was at second look day and estimated about 120 of us --- although attendance was not mandatory. They asked how many were still considering other schools and it seemed to be about 15 sets of hands raised. They did not say anything about the wait-list.
 
Top